Review/Short Perspective: “Never Events” likely never occur without a breach in the standard of care (SOC) while “Near Never Events” are typically not far behind

Background: “Never Events” (<1/1000) likely never occur without a breach in the standard of care (SOC), while “Near Never Events” (<1/100) are typically not far behind. Methods: “Never Events” are described as “Harmful hospital-acquired conditions that the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services identified in 2008.” Here, we focused on wrong-site spine surgery (WSSS)/wrong-level spine surgery (WLSS), 3 select cases of Caspar Distraction Screws causing hematomas, and one medicolegal case involving multiple simultaneous “Never Events.” Results: The spine literature documented the following frequencies of wrong-site spine surgery WSSS/”Never Events” as occurring in 4.5/10,000 lumbar, 6.8/10,000 cervical, and 2.2/10,000 cranial procedures; other series focused on the incidence of wrong-level spine surgery (WLSS). Three “Never Events” consisting of cervical epidural hematomas were attributed to Caspar Distraction Screws. A medicolegal case is also presented in which a spine surgeon caused multiple simultaneous “Never Events” (i.e., ipsilateral surgical errors) during an anterior cervical fusion. Finally, the definition of “Never Events” was newly expanded to better assess “Near Never Events”, as the latter applied to varied frequencies of esophageal perforations, plate/screw migration/erosions/displacement, cerebrospinal fluid leaks, infection, and other factors. Conclusion: “Never Events” (<1/1000) likely never occur without a breach in the SOC, while “Near Never Events” (<1/100) are typically not far behind.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surgical Neurology International
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25259/sni_550_2026
Primary Topic
Esophageal and GI Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Review/Short Perspective: “Never Events” likely never occur without a breach in the standard of care (SOC) while “Near Never Events” are typically not far behind

Marc A. Agulnick, Nancy E. Epstein
Surgical Neurology International
Esophageal and GI Pathology
article

Review/Short Perspective: “Never Events” likely never occur without a breach in the standard of care (SOC) while “Near Never Events” are typically not far behind

Marc A. Agulnick, Nancy E. Epstein
article en

Abstract

Background: “Never Events” (<1/1000) likely never occur without a breach in the standard of care (SOC), while “Near Never Events” (<1/100) are typically not far behind. Methods: “Never Events” are described as “Harmful hospital-acquired conditions that the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services identified in 2008.” Here, we focused on wrong-site spine surgery (WSSS)/wrong-level spine surgery (WLSS), 3 select cases of Caspar Distraction Screws causing hematomas, and one medicolegal case involving multiple simultaneous “Never Events.” Results: The spine literature documented the following frequencies of wrong-site spine surgery WSSS/”Never Events” as occurring in 4.5/10,000 lumbar, 6.8/10,000 cervical, and 2.2/10,000 cranial procedures; other series focused on the incidence of wrong-level spine surgery (WLSS). Three “Never Events” consisting of cervical epidural hematomas were attributed to Caspar Distraction Screws. A medicolegal case is also presented in which a spine surgeon caused multiple simultaneous “Never Events” (i.e., ipsilateral surgical errors) during an anterior cervical fusion. Finally, the definition of “Never Events” was newly expanded to better assess “Near Never Events”, as the latter applied to varied frequencies of esophageal perforations, plate/screw migration/erosions/displacement, cerebrospinal fluid leaks, infection, and other factors. Conclusion: “Never Events” (<1/1000) likely never occur without a breach in the SOC, while “Near Never Events” (<1/100) are typically not far behind.

Surgical Neurology InternationalVol. 17
Island Hospital (US), Stony Brook University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Esophageal and GI Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.