Screening and Stratification Utility of GDF-15 and FGF-21 in Individuals Evaluated for Suspected Mitochondrial Disease: A Malaysian Cohort Study

Background/Objectives: Early detection of mitochondrial disorders remains challenging due to phenotypic heterogeneity and limited access to definitive molecular diagnostics. Circulating biomarkers such as growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) and fibroblast growth factor-21 (FGF-21) have emerged as potential adjunct indicators. This study evaluated the screening and stratification utility of GDF-15 and FGF-21 in individuals assessed for suspected mitochondrial disease. Methods: Archived biological specimens collected between 2016 and 2017 were analysed from 221 individuals stratified into clinically high-risk, screen-positive non-high-risk, post-mortem unexplained death and healthy controls groups. Plasma and fibroblast lysate concentrations of GDF-15 and FGF-21 were quantified using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Biomarker performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, comparative group analysis and correlation testing across clinically defined referral groups. Results: Both biomarkers were significantly elevated in clinically high-risk and screen-positive individuals compared with controls. GDF-15 demonstrated better discriminatory performance than FGF-21, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.7187 ± 0.0556 versus 0.6301 ± 0.0603. At a threshold of 300 pg/mL, GDF-15 demonstrated high sensitivity with moderate specificity for differentiation between clinically defined high-risk individuals and controls. Correlation analysis showed weak associations between GDF-15 and lactate and ammonia, while FGF-21 correlated modestly with glucose and alkaline phosphatase. A moderate positive correlation was observed between GDF-15 and FGF-21 across the overall cohort. Conclusions: GDF-15 and, to a lesser extent, FGF-21 may support early screening and stratification of individuals evaluated for suspected mitochondrial disease and assist in prioritising cases for further diagnostic evaluation.