Improving Contraceptive Counseling for College-Aged People with Uteruses: Implementing an Artificial Intelligence-Based Contraceptive Decision Aid at a University Health Clinic

Unintended pregnancy disproportionately affects college-aged people with a uterus, with rates of 76% among those aged 18-19 and 56% among those aged 20–24. Contributing barriers include digital misinformation, limited appointment time, and inconsistent provider training in contraceptive counseling. This quality improvement project evaluated the impact of an AI-based contraceptive decision aid (SARHAchat™) on patient and provider satisfaction with contraceptive counseling at a university health clinic. SARHAchat™ was implemented across four iterative, two-week Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles (September–November 2025) in the Gynecology department at UNC Campus Health. A pre-appointment link was distributed to patients for voluntary completion. Patient satisfaction and decisional conflict were assessed using the Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling (PCCC) Measure and SURE tool. Provider satisfaction was evaluated via a Likert-scale survey. Of 91 eligible patients, 27.5% completed surveys and 19.8% of provider-reported encounters involved SARHAchat™ use. Decisional conflict was low (96% reported none), and contraception initiation was high (92%), though neither patient nor provider satisfaction met the 80% benchmark (68% and 69%, respectively). SARHAchat™ users were less likely to rate their provider as "Excellent" than non-users (33% vs. 79%), a clinically meaningful though statistically non-significant difference (p = 0.07), likely reflecting the small user sample. Low SARHAchat™ uptake (19.8%) limited the ability to draw conclusions, though high decisional clarity and contraception initiation suggest promise. Satisfaction benchmarks were not met, and lower provider ratings among SARHAchat™ users warrant further investigation. Future efforts should focus on improving pre-appointment engagement to enable more definitive evaluation of the tool's effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/sf90-h093
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving Contraceptive Counseling for College-Aged People with Uteruses: Implementing an Artificial Intelligence-Based Contraceptive Decision Aid at a University Health Clinic

Stephanie Edwards-Latchu
UNC Libraries
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Improving Contraceptive Counseling for College-Aged People with Uteruses: Implementing an Artificial Intelligence-Based Contraceptive Decision Aid at a University Health Clinic

Stephanie Edwards-Latchu
article en

Abstract

Unintended pregnancy disproportionately affects college-aged people with a uterus, with rates of 76% among those aged 18-19 and 56% among those aged 20–24. Contributing barriers include digital misinformation, limited appointment time, and inconsistent provider training in contraceptive counseling. This quality improvement project evaluated the impact of an AI-based contraceptive decision aid (SARHAchat™) on patient and provider satisfaction with contraceptive counseling at a university health clinic. SARHAchat™ was implemented across four iterative, two-week Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles (September–November 2025) in the Gynecology department at UNC Campus Health. A pre-appointment link was distributed to patients for voluntary completion. Patient satisfaction and decisional conflict were assessed using the Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling (PCCC) Measure and SURE tool. Provider satisfaction was evaluated via a Likert-scale survey. Of 91 eligible patients, 27.5% completed surveys and 19.8% of provider-reported encounters involved SARHAchat™ use. Decisional conflict was low (96% reported none), and contraception initiation was high (92%), though neither patient nor provider satisfaction met the 80% benchmark (68% and 69%, respectively). SARHAchat™ users were less likely to rate their provider as "Excellent" than non-users (33% vs. 79%), a clinically meaningful though statistically non-significant difference (p = 0.07), likely reflecting the small user sample. Low SARHAchat™ uptake (19.8%) limited the ability to draw conclusions, though high decisional clarity and contraception initiation suggest promise. Satisfaction benchmarks were not met, and lower provider ratings among SARHAchat™ users warrant further investigation. Future efforts should focus on improving pre-appointment engagement to enable more definitive evaluation of the tool's effectiveness.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.