Automated H-Scoring in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer IHC: An Internal Validation Study

Background: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) plays a central role in subtyping of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), yet conventional semi-quantitative scoring lacks objectivity and scalability. Automated digital pathology offers potential solutions, but requires robust, marker-specific validation against expert consensus scoring. Methods: We developed and internally validated an automated digital pathology pipeline for continuous IHC H-score quantification using QuPath (v0.6.0-arm64). Tissue microarrays (TMAs) were generated from transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) specimens from a cohort of patients with MIBC treated at Vancouver General Hospital. Cell detection was performed using StarDist (v0.9), followed by automated intensity-based H-score calculation for four epithelial IHC marker stains (CK14, CK20, CK5/6, and Uroplakin II). H-scoring was then restricted to tumor epithelium by object-level classification using a supervised tumor/non-tumor classifier trained on pathologist-reviewed annotations. Automated scores were compared with consensus scores from three blinded pathologists using Pearson correlation, linear regression, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and Bland–Altman analysis. Results: Automated H-scores demonstrated strong agreement with pathologist consensus across all four markers. CK14 showed near-perfect agreement (ICC ≈ 0.99) with minimal bias and narrow limits of agreement. CK20 also showed high agreement (ICC ≈ 0.95). CK5/6 and Uroplakin II demonstrated slightly lower agreement (ICC ≈ 0.92 to 0.93) with mild proportional bias. Across markers, the automated pipeline preserved a broad H-score range, with range ratios of 0.96 to 0.99. Conclusions: This study establishes a robust, methods-forward pipeline for automated continuous IHC H-scoring in MIBC. The internally validated framework provides a scalable foundation for external cohort testing and future clinical outcome-associated biomarker analyses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16111673
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automated H-Scoring in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer IHC: An Internal Validation Study

Ioana-Maria Mihai, Matthew Yap, M Alanazi, Alberto Contreras-Sanz et al.
Diagnostics
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
article

Automated H-Scoring in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer IHC: An Internal Validation Study

Ioana-Maria Mihai, Matthew Yap, M Alanazi, Alberto Contreras-Sanz, Peter Black, Gheorghe-Emilian Olteanu, Gang Wang
article en

Abstract

Background: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) plays a central role in subtyping of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), yet conventional semi-quantitative scoring lacks objectivity and scalability. Automated digital pathology offers potential solutions, but requires robust, marker-specific validation against expert consensus scoring. Methods: We developed and internally validated an automated digital pathology pipeline for continuous IHC H-score quantification using QuPath (v0.6.0-arm64). Tissue microarrays (TMAs) were generated from transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) specimens from a cohort of patients with MIBC treated at Vancouver General Hospital. Cell detection was performed using StarDist (v0.9), followed by automated intensity-based H-score calculation for four epithelial IHC marker stains (CK14, CK20, CK5/6, and Uroplakin II). H-scoring was then restricted to tumor epithelium by object-level classification using a supervised tumor/non-tumor classifier trained on pathologist-reviewed annotations. Automated scores were compared with consensus scores from three blinded pathologists using Pearson correlation, linear regression, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and Bland–Altman analysis. Results: Automated H-scores demonstrated strong agreement with pathologist consensus across all four markers. CK14 showed near-perfect agreement (ICC ≈ 0.99) with minimal bias and narrow limits of agreement. CK20 also showed high agreement (ICC ≈ 0.95). CK5/6 and Uroplakin II demonstrated slightly lower agreement (ICC ≈ 0.92 to 0.93) with mild proportional bias. Across markers, the automated pipeline preserved a broad H-score range, with range ratios of 0.96 to 0.99. Conclusions: This study establishes a robust, methods-forward pipeline for automated continuous IHC H-scoring in MIBC. The internally validated framework provides a scalable foundation for external cohort testing and future clinical outcome-associated biomarker analyses.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(11)
BC Cancer Agency (CA), University of British Columbia (CA), King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (SA), Royal Brompton Hospital (GB)
Cancer Research Society
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.