PROGRAM EVALUATION OF REFERRAL AND SERVICE DELIVERY OF MEDICAL NUTRITION THERAPY (MNT) SERVICES AT SILER CITY PIEDMONT HEALTH

PURPOSE Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a growing health concern in the United States and a leading cause of death among older Latino individuals. This chronic disease is associated with multiple complications, including neuropathy, cardiovascular disease, retinopathy, and foot disease. Evidence-based management strategies include pharmacologic therapy, diabetes self-management education and support, and medical nutrition therapy (MNT). Medical nutrition therapy alone has been shown to reduce hemoglobin A1C by up to 2%, and referrals are recommended at four critical time points in diabetes care. Despite these recommendations, referral and utilization of MNT services remain inconsistent in many community health settings.METHODS This program evaluation was conducted at Siler City Piedmont Health, a federally qualified health center providing MNT services to patients with T2DM with a predominantly Latino clinic population. A three-month evaluation, using the Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) evaluation framework, assessed the effectiveness and utilization of existing MNT services. Quantitative descriptive data and qualitative data from staff surveys were collected to evaluate referral patterns, scheduling processes, and staff perceptions related to MNT service delivery.RESULTS Among 123 eligible adult patients with T2DM, 38.2% (n = 47) were scheduled for MNT services. Of those scheduled, 72.3% (34/47) completed at least one MNT visit, and 76.5% (26/34) occurred within 30 days of scheduling. Only 2.4% (3/123) of eligible patients declined scheduling, while 23.4% (11/47) of scheduled visits were not completed due to cancellation or no-show. Qualitative findings revealed variability in documentation practices, limited use of standardized scheduling tools, and differing staff perceptions regarding patient engagement and workflow efficiency. Staff also identified structural challenges related to scheduling processes, competing clinic priorities, and uncertainty regarding implementation of telehealth services.CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest that system-level processes and scheduling workflows influence MNT referral and participation rates. Recommendations included promoting preventive care visits to facilitate referrals, expanding bilingual registered dietician (RD) capacity, exploring telehealth options to improve access, and further evaluating patient-level barriers to MNT participation. Overall, findings suggest that staff are receptive to improving MNT services but require clearer workflows and structural support to optimize program changes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/7rx7-vh19
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PROGRAM EVALUATION OF REFERRAL AND SERVICE DELIVERY OF MEDICAL NUTRITION THERAPY (MNT) SERVICES AT SILER CITY PIEDMONT HEALTH

Leslie Gabriela Morales
UNC Libraries
Diabetes Management and Education
article

PROGRAM EVALUATION OF REFERRAL AND SERVICE DELIVERY OF MEDICAL NUTRITION THERAPY (MNT) SERVICES AT SILER CITY PIEDMONT HEALTH

Leslie Gabriela Morales
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a growing health concern in the United States and a leading cause of death among older Latino individuals. This chronic disease is associated with multiple complications, including neuropathy, cardiovascular disease, retinopathy, and foot disease. Evidence-based management strategies include pharmacologic therapy, diabetes self-management education and support, and medical nutrition therapy (MNT). Medical nutrition therapy alone has been shown to reduce hemoglobin A1C by up to 2%, and referrals are recommended at four critical time points in diabetes care. Despite these recommendations, referral and utilization of MNT services remain inconsistent in many community health settings.METHODS This program evaluation was conducted at Siler City Piedmont Health, a federally qualified health center providing MNT services to patients with T2DM with a predominantly Latino clinic population. A three-month evaluation, using the Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) evaluation framework, assessed the effectiveness and utilization of existing MNT services. Quantitative descriptive data and qualitative data from staff surveys were collected to evaluate referral patterns, scheduling processes, and staff perceptions related to MNT service delivery.RESULTS Among 123 eligible adult patients with T2DM, 38.2% (n = 47) were scheduled for MNT services. Of those scheduled, 72.3% (34/47) completed at least one MNT visit, and 76.5% (26/34) occurred within 30 days of scheduling. Only 2.4% (3/123) of eligible patients declined scheduling, while 23.4% (11/47) of scheduled visits were not completed due to cancellation or no-show. Qualitative findings revealed variability in documentation practices, limited use of standardized scheduling tools, and differing staff perceptions regarding patient engagement and workflow efficiency. Staff also identified structural challenges related to scheduling processes, competing clinic priorities, and uncertainty regarding implementation of telehealth services.CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest that system-level processes and scheduling workflows influence MNT referral and participation rates. Recommendations included promoting preventive care visits to facilitate referrals, expanding bilingual registered dietician (RD) capacity, exploring telehealth options to improve access, and further evaluating patient-level barriers to MNT participation. Overall, findings suggest that staff are receptive to improving MNT services but require clearer workflows and structural support to optimize program changes.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Diabetes Management and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.