Cross-sectional survey of obstetrical providers’ knowledge, attitudes, and use of non-invasive prenatal testing for 22q11.2 deletion

Objective This study’s primary objective was to characterize obstetrical providers’ knowledge and utilization of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for 22q11.2 deletion screening. Study Design A one-time survey was distributed to physicians, nurse practitioners, and midwives. Participants answered eighteen multiple choice questions pertaining to demographic information, clinical use of carrier and NIPT screening, and knowledge regarding use of NIPT for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Responses were descriptively analyzed based on years of clinical experience and provider subspecialty. Results Twenty-two providers responded to the survey: six OB/GYN resident physicians, ten OB/GYN generalist physicians, three Maternal-Fetal Medicine physicians, two nurse practitioners, and one midwife. All resident physicians reported never ordering 22q11.2 deletion NIPT screening, despite using a Trisomy screening panel which includes 22q11.2 deletion as an opt out. Conversely, all experienced physicians (n=13) reported using expanded panels and screening for 22q11.2 deletion. Only half of our sample who completed the survey (n=10), felt adequately informed to counsel patients on screening results and procedures. Conclusion Our findings demonstrate an association between years in practice and the utilization of 22q11.2 deletion NIPT screening. Enhanced educational initiatives beginning during residency is necessary to improve provider knowledge on 22q11.2 deletion screening, information regarding test ordering, and counseling procedures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Perinatology Reports
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2884-8604
Primary Topic
Congenital heart defects research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-sectional survey of obstetrical providers’ knowledge, attitudes, and use of non-invasive prenatal testing for 22q11.2 deletion

Nabila Azeem, Madeline Allen, Juliana Simon, Hind Moussa et al.
American Journal of Perinatology Reports
Congenital heart defects research
article

Cross-sectional survey of obstetrical providers’ knowledge, attitudes, and use of non-invasive prenatal testing for 22q11.2 deletion

Nabila Azeem, Madeline Allen, Juliana Simon, Hind Moussa, James W. Van Hook
article en

Abstract

Objective This study’s primary objective was to characterize obstetrical providers’ knowledge and utilization of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for 22q11.2 deletion screening. Study Design A one-time survey was distributed to physicians, nurse practitioners, and midwives. Participants answered eighteen multiple choice questions pertaining to demographic information, clinical use of carrier and NIPT screening, and knowledge regarding use of NIPT for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Responses were descriptively analyzed based on years of clinical experience and provider subspecialty. Results Twenty-two providers responded to the survey: six OB/GYN resident physicians, ten OB/GYN generalist physicians, three Maternal-Fetal Medicine physicians, two nurse practitioners, and one midwife. All resident physicians reported never ordering 22q11.2 deletion NIPT screening, despite using a Trisomy screening panel which includes 22q11.2 deletion as an opt out. Conversely, all experienced physicians (n=13) reported using expanded panels and screening for 22q11.2 deletion. Only half of our sample who completed the survey (n=10), felt adequately informed to counsel patients on screening results and procedures. Conclusion Our findings demonstrate an association between years in practice and the utilization of 22q11.2 deletion NIPT screening. Enhanced educational initiatives beginning during residency is necessary to improve provider knowledge on 22q11.2 deletion screening, information regarding test ordering, and counseling procedures.

American Journal of Perinatology Reports
University of South Florida (US), ProMedica Charles and Virginia Hickman Hospital (US), University of Toledo (US), University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Congenital heart defects research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.