Māori Research Data Governance in New Zealand Universities

Universities in Aotearoa generate and hold large volumes of research data, including increasing amounts of Māori data shaped by Vision Mātauranga. Yet practice around Māori Data Sovereignty (MDSov) remains uneven, with commitments often aspirational rather than operational. This article assesses how Tiriti‐led institutions are upholding the mana and mauri of Māori data as taonga and identifies how bureaucratic inertia maintains the gap between policy signals and everyday research practice. Using a data ecosystem lens, we consider the roles of actors, stakeholders and Māori as rightsholders across the research lifecycle. A case study of Waipapa Taumata Rau highlights both progress and fragmentation. We synthesise recent Māori and Indigenous data governance developments and propose practical steps to shift from voluntary alignment to accountable practice. We argue that meaningful implementation of Māori Research Data Governance is necessary for universities to act as kaitiaki and ensure Māori benefit from data use and reuse.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/snz2.70048
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Māori Research Data Governance in New Zealand Universities

Larissa Renfrew, Kiri West
Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand
Research Data Management Practices
article

Māori Research Data Governance in New Zealand Universities

Larissa Renfrew, Kiri West
article en

Abstract

Universities in Aotearoa generate and hold large volumes of research data, including increasing amounts of Māori data shaped by Vision Mātauranga. Yet practice around Māori Data Sovereignty (MDSov) remains uneven, with commitments often aspirational rather than operational. This article assesses how Tiriti‐led institutions are upholding the mana and mauri of Māori data as taonga and identifies how bureaucratic inertia maintains the gap between policy signals and everyday research practice. Using a data ecosystem lens, we consider the roles of actors, stakeholders and Māori as rightsholders across the research lifecycle. A case study of Waipapa Taumata Rau highlights both progress and fragmentation. We synthesise recent Māori and Indigenous data governance developments and propose practical steps to shift from voluntary alignment to accountable practice. We argue that meaningful implementation of Māori Research Data Governance is necessary for universities to act as kaitiaki and ensure Māori benefit from data use and reuse.

Journal of the Royal Society of New ZealandVol. 56(3)
University of Auckland (NZ)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Research Data Management Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.