A Clinically Relevant Threshold of Impaired Contrast Sensitivity Among Older US Adults

Importance: Contrast sensitivity (CS) is a critical yet underused measure of visual function that reflects the ability to detect subtle differences in luminance between an object and its background. Although poor CS is associated with falls, cognitive decline, and reduced independence in older adults, existing thresholds lack functional relevance. Objective: To identify a CS threshold associated with functional visual disability. Design, Setting, and Participants: This longitudinal cohort study used data from rounds 12 (2022) and 13 (2023) of the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), a nationally representative cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older in the US. Analyses included 4475 community-dwelling participants with available binocular contrast sensitivity and self-reported vision data. Data were analyzed from September 2024 to January 2026. Exposures: Logarithm-scaled, binocular-presenting CS (logCS). Main Outcomes and Measures: Self-reported visual disability (SRVD), defined by difficulty recognizing faces, reading newspaper print, or seeing the television across a room. Covariates include age, education, race, income, visual acuity, frailty, and multimorbidity. Multiple logistic regression models were used to examine the association between CS and SRVD, and survey-weighted receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to identify an optimal CS threshold using the Youden index. Results: Weighted mean logCS (SE) among participants was 1.72 (<0.01). At baseline, the mean contrast sensitivity in individuals with SRVD was 1.49 (0.03) logCS compared with 1.73 (<0.01) logCS among those without SRVD. Participants who developed new SRVD at 1-year follow-up demonstrated a mean decline in logCS from 1.62 to 1.56 logCS. Each 0.1-unit decrease in baseline logCS was independently associated with 12% higher odds of incident SRVD (odds ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.08-1.16). A threshold of 1.60 logCS maximized discrimination for functional visual disability (sensitivity, 67% [95% CI, 62%-71%]; specificity, 70% [95% CI, 69%-72%]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, a threshold of 1.60 logCS represented the functional threshold at which older adults began to experience SRVD. This functionally anchored cutoff provides a benchmark for interpreting CS measures, although sensitivity and specificity were moderate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Ophthalmology
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2026.1570
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Clinically Relevant Threshold of Impaired Contrast Sensitivity Among Older US Adults

Lindsey B. De Lott, Yunshu Zhou, Shu Xu, Mengyao Hu et al.
JAMA Ophthalmology
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

A Clinically Relevant Threshold of Impaired Contrast Sensitivity Among Older US Adults

Lindsey B. De Lott, Yunshu Zhou, Shu Xu, Mengyao Hu, Mickey Nguyen, Joshua R. Ehrlich
article en

Abstract

Importance: Contrast sensitivity (CS) is a critical yet underused measure of visual function that reflects the ability to detect subtle differences in luminance between an object and its background. Although poor CS is associated with falls, cognitive decline, and reduced independence in older adults, existing thresholds lack functional relevance. Objective: To identify a CS threshold associated with functional visual disability. Design, Setting, and Participants: This longitudinal cohort study used data from rounds 12 (2022) and 13 (2023) of the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), a nationally representative cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older in the US. Analyses included 4475 community-dwelling participants with available binocular contrast sensitivity and self-reported vision data. Data were analyzed from September 2024 to January 2026. Exposures: Logarithm-scaled, binocular-presenting CS (logCS). Main Outcomes and Measures: Self-reported visual disability (SRVD), defined by difficulty recognizing faces, reading newspaper print, or seeing the television across a room. Covariates include age, education, race, income, visual acuity, frailty, and multimorbidity. Multiple logistic regression models were used to examine the association between CS and SRVD, and survey-weighted receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to identify an optimal CS threshold using the Youden index. Results: Weighted mean logCS (SE) among participants was 1.72 (<0.01). At baseline, the mean contrast sensitivity in individuals with SRVD was 1.49 (0.03) logCS compared with 1.73 (<0.01) logCS among those without SRVD. Participants who developed new SRVD at 1-year follow-up demonstrated a mean decline in logCS from 1.62 to 1.56 logCS. Each 0.1-unit decrease in baseline logCS was independently associated with 12% higher odds of incident SRVD (odds ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.08-1.16). A threshold of 1.60 logCS maximized discrimination for functional visual disability (sensitivity, 67% [95% CI, 62%-71%]; specificity, 70% [95% CI, 69%-72%]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, a threshold of 1.60 logCS represented the functional threshold at which older adults began to experience SRVD. This functionally anchored cutoff provides a benchmark for interpreting CS measures, although sensitivity and specificity were moderate.

JAMA Ophthalmology
University of Michigan (US), Arbor Research Collaborative for Health (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.