Real-world patterns and outcomes of cancer-related distress assessed by the NCCN distress thermometer in community oncology practice in western India.

e13578 Background: Cancer-related distress can adversely affect treatment adherence and quality of life, yet real-world evidence from Indian community oncology settings on this issue remains scarce. Methods: Adult Cancer patients were retrospectively assessed with NCCN Distress Thermometer between April 2025–December 2025. Distress was evaluated across physical, emotional, practical, social and spiritual domains at baseline and follow-up. Associations with age, disease stage and diagnosis were analyzed. Changes over time were assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Among 2273 patients evaluated, the median age of the cohort was 58.3 years (SD 13.1) with M:F ratio of 1:1.4. Most patients had ECOG PS 0–1 (54.1%) and presented predominantly with stage IV disease (45.8%).The common cancers evaluated were breast (n = 570,25%), gastrointestinal (n = 360, 15.8%), gynaecologic (n = 297,13%) & head & neck cancers ( n = 224,9.8%). Mean distress score significantly reduced from 5.2 at baseline to 3.5 at follow-up (p < 0.001) with median scores improving from 5 to 3. A total of 57.4% had baseline distress scores ≥5 and it was associated with stage IV disease (p = 0.040); baseline distress was higher in patients < 60 years (p < 0.001). Overall 50.7% improved, 42.8% remained stable & 6.5% worsened. Improvement rates were consistently high across cancer types (≈67–79%), most common in Breast (79.3%), lymphoma (76%) and Head & Neck (75.5%). Improvement was significantly higher in younger patients 75% vs 64% in elders (p = 0.014) & in those with early-stage disease (stage I–II) 78% vs stage III–IV 66% (p = 0.016). Most commonly reported concerns were : in the physical (n = 1925,84.6%; including pain 59.5%, fatigue 50.7% & changes in abilities 45.7%), emotional (n = 1804,79.4%; anxiety 69.2%, sadness 26.8%), and practical (n = 1780,78.3%; self-care 84.2%, finances 22.7%); while fewer reported were social (n = 625, 27.5%) or spiritual/religious (n = 365, 16.1%) concerns. Across breast, gastrointestinal, gynecologic, and head and neck cancers, physical (n = 1,258) and emotional (n = 1,199) concerns were the two most prevalent domains. Conclusions: Routine implementation of the NCCN Distress Thermometer in community oncology practice in Western India enabled systematic identification of multidimensional distress and was associated with significant, tumor-agnostic improvement in patient-reported distress, highlighting its clinical utility as a pragmatic supportive care screening tool in real-world Indian settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.e13578
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world patterns and outcomes of cancer-related distress assessed by the NCCN distress thermometer in community oncology practice in western India.

Kunal Jobanputra, Pritam Kalaskar, Chandrashekhar Pethe, Prakash Devde et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Real-world patterns and outcomes of cancer-related distress assessed by the NCCN distress thermometer in community oncology practice in western India.

Kunal Jobanputra, Pritam Kalaskar, Chandrashekhar Pethe, Prakash Devde, S. Jagiasi, Disha Morzaria, Ritu Davé, Kshitij Joshi, Vashista Maniar, R. Wategaonkar, Shreya Jaokar, Tushar Patil, Nikhat Shaikh, Ashish Joshi, Krushna Chaudhari, Devshri Bauskar, Udip Maheshwari, Bhoomika Jasrotia, Shrenika Bhosale, Nitin Bayas
article en

Abstract

e13578 Background: Cancer-related distress can adversely affect treatment adherence and quality of life, yet real-world evidence from Indian community oncology settings on this issue remains scarce. Methods: Adult Cancer patients were retrospectively assessed with NCCN Distress Thermometer between April 2025–December 2025. Distress was evaluated across physical, emotional, practical, social and spiritual domains at baseline and follow-up. Associations with age, disease stage and diagnosis were analyzed. Changes over time were assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Among 2273 patients evaluated, the median age of the cohort was 58.3 years (SD 13.1) with M:F ratio of 1:1.4. Most patients had ECOG PS 0–1 (54.1%) and presented predominantly with stage IV disease (45.8%).The common cancers evaluated were breast (n = 570,25%), gastrointestinal (n = 360, 15.8%), gynaecologic (n = 297,13%) & head & neck cancers ( n = 224,9.8%). Mean distress score significantly reduced from 5.2 at baseline to 3.5 at follow-up (p < 0.001) with median scores improving from 5 to 3. A total of 57.4% had baseline distress scores ≥5 and it was associated with stage IV disease (p = 0.040); baseline distress was higher in patients < 60 years (p < 0.001). Overall 50.7% improved, 42.8% remained stable & 6.5% worsened. Improvement rates were consistently high across cancer types (≈67–79%), most common in Breast (79.3%), lymphoma (76%) and Head & Neck (75.5%). Improvement was significantly higher in younger patients 75% vs 64% in elders (p = 0.014) & in those with early-stage disease (stage I–II) 78% vs stage III–IV 66% (p = 0.016). Most commonly reported concerns were : in the physical (n = 1925,84.6%; including pain 59.5%, fatigue 50.7% & changes in abilities 45.7%), emotional (n = 1804,79.4%; anxiety 69.2%, sadness 26.8%), and practical (n = 1780,78.3%; self-care 84.2%, finances 22.7%); while fewer reported were social (n = 625, 27.5%) or spiritual/religious (n = 365, 16.1%) concerns. Across breast, gastrointestinal, gynecologic, and head and neck cancers, physical (n = 1,258) and emotional (n = 1,199) concerns were the two most prevalent domains. Conclusions: Routine implementation of the NCCN Distress Thermometer in community oncology practice in Western India enabled systematic identification of multidimensional distress and was associated with significant, tumor-agnostic improvement in patient-reported distress, highlighting its clinical utility as a pragmatic supportive care screening tool in real-world Indian settings.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
HCG Cancer Centre (IN), Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.