Social and Behavioral Correlates of Self-Perceived Psychological Distress in Celiac Disease During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study (COVIMPACT)

Background: Celiac disease (CeD) requires lifelong adherence to a strict gluten-free (GF) diet. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the prevailing clinical assumption was that food supply disruptions and dietary management difficulties would be the primary sources of patient distress. This exploratory cross-sectional study directly tested this assumption in an Italian CeD cohort. Methods: COVIMPACT is an exploratory observational, web-based study conducted in Italy (data collected: July–September 2024; participants retrospectively reported their experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic period 2020–2022). Participants with a confirmed CeD diagnosis were recruited through patient associations and online networks. A structured 26-item questionnaire addressed socio-demographic, nutritional, psychological, and healthcare-access domains. Descriptive statistics, chi-square bivariate analyses (Cramér’s V as effect size), and binary logistic regression were performed using R (v4.1) and Python. Results: Among 118 participants (78% female; median age 36 years; IQR 12–42), 27% reported self-perceived psychological distress. Against expectation, difficulties in accessing GF products and changes in gluten consumption showed no clear associations with distress. Instead, social exclusion showed the strongest association (Firth OR = 5.55, 95% CI: 1.80–17.09, p = 0.003), while reduced physical activity (Firth OR = 5.28, 95% CI: 1.86–14.99, p = 0.002, full model; Firth OR = 5.54, p = 0.001, reduced model) and negative economic impact (Firth OR = 3.77, 95% CI: 0.89–15.97, p = 0.071, trend) were additional associated factors. Female sex showed a non-significant trend (Firth OR = 4.21, p = 0.082). All estimates carry wide confidence intervals (EPV = 4.1) and should be treated as hypothesis-generating. Conclusions: These preliminary findings suggest that social exclusion and physical inactivity may be more strongly associated with self-perceived distress than dietary challenges in contexts where GF food access is structurally protected. Results are exploratory, hypothesis-generating, and should not be generalised beyond this selected Italian cohort.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrients
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18111731
Primary Topic
Celiac Disease Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social and Behavioral Correlates of Self-Perceived Psychological Distress in Celiac Disease During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study (COVIMPACT)

C Vecchi, Francesco Valitutti, Riccardo Panella, Alessandra Marenna et al.
Nutrients
Celiac Disease Research and Management
article

Social and Behavioral Correlates of Self-Perceived Psychological Distress in Celiac Disease During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study (COVIMPACT)

C Vecchi, Francesco Valitutti, Riccardo Panella, Alessandra Marenna, A Fasano, Annarita Vignapiano, Francesco Monaco, Giulio Corrivetti, Paolo Ciambelli, Luca Steardo
article en

Abstract

Background: Celiac disease (CeD) requires lifelong adherence to a strict gluten-free (GF) diet. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the prevailing clinical assumption was that food supply disruptions and dietary management difficulties would be the primary sources of patient distress. This exploratory cross-sectional study directly tested this assumption in an Italian CeD cohort. Methods: COVIMPACT is an exploratory observational, web-based study conducted in Italy (data collected: July–September 2024; participants retrospectively reported their experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic period 2020–2022). Participants with a confirmed CeD diagnosis were recruited through patient associations and online networks. A structured 26-item questionnaire addressed socio-demographic, nutritional, psychological, and healthcare-access domains. Descriptive statistics, chi-square bivariate analyses (Cramér’s V as effect size), and binary logistic regression were performed using R (v4.1) and Python. Results: Among 118 participants (78% female; median age 36 years; IQR 12–42), 27% reported self-perceived psychological distress. Against expectation, difficulties in accessing GF products and changes in gluten consumption showed no clear associations with distress. Instead, social exclusion showed the strongest association (Firth OR = 5.55, 95% CI: 1.80–17.09, p = 0.003), while reduced physical activity (Firth OR = 5.28, 95% CI: 1.86–14.99, p = 0.002, full model; Firth OR = 5.54, p = 0.001, reduced model) and negative economic impact (Firth OR = 3.77, 95% CI: 0.89–15.97, p = 0.071, trend) were additional associated factors. Female sex showed a non-significant trend (Firth OR = 4.21, p = 0.082). All estimates carry wide confidence intervals (EPV = 4.1) and should be treated as hypothesis-generating. Conclusions: These preliminary findings suggest that social exclusion and physical inactivity may be more strongly associated with self-perceived distress than dietary challenges in contexts where GF food access is structurally protected. Results are exploratory, hypothesis-generating, and should not be generalised beyond this selected Italian cohort.

NutrientsVol. 18(11)
Boston Children's Hospital (US), University of Salerno (IT), University of Perugia (IT), Magna Graecia University (IT), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), ASL Roma (IT), Denali Therapeutics (United States) (US), European Biomedical Research Institute of Salerno (IT), Azienda Sanitaria Locale Roma 3 (IT), University of Florence (IT), Aalborg University (DK)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Celiac Disease Research and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.