Comparative outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients with and without myasthenia gravis: A propensity score–matched analysis.

e19019 Background: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is commonly associated with autoimmune complications, most of which are hematological in nature. Rarely, non-hematological autoimmune disorders such as myasthenia gravis (MG) have been reported to occur in patients with CLL, with only a small number of cases described in the literature since the 1960s. Despite this, the clinical impact remains poorly characterized, particularly regarding outcomes such as mortality, hospitalization, infectious risk, and treatment patterns. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using electronic health record data to identify adults with CLL, with and without MG. Propensity score matching was performed using age, sex, and additional clinical variables to create two balanced cohorts. Outcomes assessed included mortality, hospitalizations, sepsis/bacteremia, and use of immunomodulatory therapies. Statistical analyses included Kaplan–Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Results: After matching, each cohort contained 171 patients with similar demographics. Mortality risk was 16.4% in CLL patients and 18.1% in CLL + MG patients (risk difference −0.018; 95% CI: −0.098 to 0.063; p = 0.668). Hospitalization occurred in 29.2% of CLL patients versus 39.2% in CLL + MG patients (risk difference −0.099; 95% CI: −0.199 to 0.001; p = 0.053). Rates of sepsis/bacteremia were 17.0% versus 20.5% (risk difference −0.035; 95% CI: −0.118 to 0.048; p = 0.405). Use of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors was significantly higher in the MG group (46.2% vs. 5.8%; risk difference −0.404; 95% CI: −0.486 to −0.321; p < 0.001), as was corticosteroid usage (74.9% vs. 56.1%; risk difference −0.187; 95% CI: −0.286 to −0.088; p < 0.001) and steroid-sparing agents (15.2% vs. 5.8%; risk difference −0.094; 95% CI: −0.158 to −0.029; p = 0.005). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed no significant difference in overall survival between groups (mortality, log-rank p = 0.738), but survival probability declined more markedly with MG in specific therapeutic subgroups. Conclusions: Patients with both CLL and MG exhibit higher rates of immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory therapy use and trends toward increased mortality and hospitalizations, though most results are not statistically significant except for specific medication exposures. These findings highlight the need for tailored management and further research for this clinical population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.e19019
Primary Topic
Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients with and without myasthenia gravis: A propensity score–matched analysis.

Maryam Habib, Ali Sanjari Moghaddam, Alexander Urena, Silvana E. Ribeiro Papp et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
article

Comparative outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients with and without myasthenia gravis: A propensity score–matched analysis.

Maryam Habib, Ali Sanjari Moghaddam, Alexander Urena, Silvana E. Ribeiro Papp, A Atrash, D Sweeder
article en

Abstract

e19019 Background: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is commonly associated with autoimmune complications, most of which are hematological in nature. Rarely, non-hematological autoimmune disorders such as myasthenia gravis (MG) have been reported to occur in patients with CLL, with only a small number of cases described in the literature since the 1960s. Despite this, the clinical impact remains poorly characterized, particularly regarding outcomes such as mortality, hospitalization, infectious risk, and treatment patterns. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using electronic health record data to identify adults with CLL, with and without MG. Propensity score matching was performed using age, sex, and additional clinical variables to create two balanced cohorts. Outcomes assessed included mortality, hospitalizations, sepsis/bacteremia, and use of immunomodulatory therapies. Statistical analyses included Kaplan–Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Results: After matching, each cohort contained 171 patients with similar demographics. Mortality risk was 16.4% in CLL patients and 18.1% in CLL + MG patients (risk difference −0.018; 95% CI: −0.098 to 0.063; p = 0.668). Hospitalization occurred in 29.2% of CLL patients versus 39.2% in CLL + MG patients (risk difference −0.099; 95% CI: −0.199 to 0.001; p = 0.053). Rates of sepsis/bacteremia were 17.0% versus 20.5% (risk difference −0.035; 95% CI: −0.118 to 0.048; p = 0.405). Use of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors was significantly higher in the MG group (46.2% vs. 5.8%; risk difference −0.404; 95% CI: −0.486 to −0.321; p < 0.001), as was corticosteroid usage (74.9% vs. 56.1%; risk difference −0.187; 95% CI: −0.286 to −0.088; p < 0.001) and steroid-sparing agents (15.2% vs. 5.8%; risk difference −0.094; 95% CI: −0.158 to −0.029; p = 0.005). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed no significant difference in overall survival between groups (mortality, log-rank p = 0.738), but survival probability declined more markedly with MG in specific therapeutic subgroups. Conclusions: Patients with both CLL and MG exhibit higher rates of immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory therapy use and trends toward increased mortality and hospitalizations, though most results are not statistically significant except for specific medication exposures. These findings highlight the need for tailored management and further research for this clinical population.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
UPMC Central Pa (US), Drexel University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.