Predictors of response and safety profile of axatilimab in chronic GVHD: Pooled analysis of 384 patients.

e18564 Background: Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) remains a significant complication following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, impacting more than half of HCT recipients. Monocytes and macrophages dependent on colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) play a crucial role as mediators in chronic GVHD. Axatilimab, a humanized monoclonal antibody, blocks CSF-1R signaling to inhibit macrophage development and has demonstrated promising clinical benefits in chronic GVHD. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize the available clinical evidence on axatilimab’s efficacy and safety in cGVHD. Methods: We followed PRISMA guidelines to search major databases until December 2025 for studies on axatilimab in chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), including clinical trials and cohorts. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed bias using the ROBINS-I, RoB 2.0, and NOS tools. Pooled proportions were calculated with random-effects models in R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) using the meta package. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of five studies comprising 384 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Using a random-effects model, the pooled overall response rate across all studies was 73% (95% CI: 60%–82%) (p<0.05). Organ-specific analyses demonstrated variable clinically significant response rates. The pooled response rate was 19% (95% CI: 4%–54%) for ocular involvement, 25% (95% CI: 6%–63%) for pulmonary involvement, 52% (95% CI: 33%–71%) for oral cavity involvement, and 42% (95% CI: 8%–86%) for joint/fascial involvement. Higher response rates were observed in gastrointestinal manifestations (p>0.05), with pooled estimates of 79% (95% CI: 7%–99%) for esophageal involvement, 99% (95% CI: 1%–100%) for lower gastrointestinal involvement, and 97% (95% CI: 0%–100%) for upper gastrointestinal involvement. It was noted that any grade treatment-related adverse events occurred in 96% of participants (95% CI: 39%–100%). The wide confidence intervals reflect the limited sample size of the studies. Conclusions: In conclusion, axatilimab demonstrates promising efficacy in treating chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), achieving an overall response rate of 73%. Response rates varied by organ involvement, with particularly high rates in gastrointestinal manifestations. However, treatment-related adverse events were noted in 96% of patients, emphasizing the need for careful monitoring. Due to the limited sample sizes and wide confidence intervals, further research is warranted to better understand the risk-benefit profile of axatilimab for the management of cGVHD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.e18564
Primary Topic
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictors of response and safety profile of axatilimab in chronic GVHD: Pooled analysis of 384 patients.

Padma Sri Katikaneni, Syed Muhammad Ali Akbar, Madho Mal, Tehreem Asghar et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
article

Predictors of response and safety profile of axatilimab in chronic GVHD: Pooled analysis of 384 patients.

Padma Sri Katikaneni, Syed Muhammad Ali Akbar, Madho Mal, Tehreem Asghar, Arhum Farooq
article en

Abstract

e18564 Background: Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) remains a significant complication following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, impacting more than half of HCT recipients. Monocytes and macrophages dependent on colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) play a crucial role as mediators in chronic GVHD. Axatilimab, a humanized monoclonal antibody, blocks CSF-1R signaling to inhibit macrophage development and has demonstrated promising clinical benefits in chronic GVHD. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize the available clinical evidence on axatilimab’s efficacy and safety in cGVHD. Methods: We followed PRISMA guidelines to search major databases until December 2025 for studies on axatilimab in chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), including clinical trials and cohorts. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed bias using the ROBINS-I, RoB 2.0, and NOS tools. Pooled proportions were calculated with random-effects models in R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) using the meta package. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of five studies comprising 384 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Using a random-effects model, the pooled overall response rate across all studies was 73% (95% CI: 60%–82%) (p<0.05). Organ-specific analyses demonstrated variable clinically significant response rates. The pooled response rate was 19% (95% CI: 4%–54%) for ocular involvement, 25% (95% CI: 6%–63%) for pulmonary involvement, 52% (95% CI: 33%–71%) for oral cavity involvement, and 42% (95% CI: 8%–86%) for joint/fascial involvement. Higher response rates were observed in gastrointestinal manifestations (p>0.05), with pooled estimates of 79% (95% CI: 7%–99%) for esophageal involvement, 99% (95% CI: 1%–100%) for lower gastrointestinal involvement, and 97% (95% CI: 0%–100%) for upper gastrointestinal involvement. It was noted that any grade treatment-related adverse events occurred in 96% of participants (95% CI: 39%–100%). The wide confidence intervals reflect the limited sample size of the studies. Conclusions: In conclusion, axatilimab demonstrates promising efficacy in treating chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), achieving an overall response rate of 73%. Response rates varied by organ involvement, with particularly high rates in gastrointestinal manifestations. However, treatment-related adverse events were noted in 96% of patients, emphasizing the need for careful monitoring. Due to the limited sample sizes and wide confidence intervals, further research is warranted to better understand the risk-benefit profile of axatilimab for the management of cGVHD.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Combined Military Hospital (PK), Sisters of Mercy Health System (US), Marshall University (US), University of Gujrat (PK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.