A descriptive analysis of the Fire service Organizational Culture of Safety (FOCUS) survey: FOCUS 3.0 survey wave

Abstract Background The Fire service Organizational Culture of Safety (FOCUS) survey, is an industry-specific assessment tool used to examine aspects of safety climate and leadership, safety behaviors, organizational outcomes, and mental health outcomes. The FOCUS survey provides participating U.S. fire departments with critical information to improve their work environment. The current iteration of the survey (FOCUS 3.0) includes expanded leadership and mental health modules. Methods This study consisted of a convenience sample of 9,078 firefighters nested within 89 fire departments (career, combination, volunteer) who assessed with the FOCUS 3.0 survey wave. A descriptive epidemiologic analysis of the FOCUS 3.0 survey metrics was conducted. We examined individual-level and department-level characteristics for the participating departments as well as average department scores. Pearson correlation matrices identified potential relationships between the survey metrics. Results Of the 9,078 individuals included in our analysis, the majority were male (88.3%), straight (89.7%), non-officers (66.1%), and non-veterans (83.4%). Our sample consisted of majority career departments (67.4%), with an average of 11 stations, and more than 5,000 calls per year (67.4%). Supervisor support for safety scores were on average 14-points higher than management commitment to safety scores. On average, 12% of respondents endorsed depression symptoms, 10% of respondents reported having anxiety symptoms, and 9% of respondents reported having suicidal ideations within the past month. We observed high positive correlations between management commitment to safety and four leadership metrics (participation in decision making, leadership communication, safety-specific transformational leadership, team psychological safety). Additionally, management commitment to safety was highly negatively correlated with emotional exhaustion (burnout), intent to leave the profession, and mental health metrics. Conclusions The findings from this study of FOCUS 3.0 departments are consistent with prior FOCUS waves (beta-test, 1.0, and 2.0). This study identified that the newly added leadership metrics are highly correlated with safety climate metrics. Thus, they may be avenues for departments to improve their organizational safety climate. This study provides an important first look into the proportion of firefighters who participated in FOCUS 3.0 that experience mental health symptoms. Future research should further investigate the mental health metrics and relationships with safety climate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Injury Epidemiology
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-026-00682-5
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A descriptive analysis of the Fire service Organizational Culture of Safety (FOCUS) survey: FOCUS 3.0 survey wave

Victoria H. Gallogly, Alexandra B. Fisher, Brisa Ney Sánchez, Sandra L. Bloom et al.
Injury Epidemiology
Occupational Health and Performance
article

A descriptive analysis of the Fire service Organizational Culture of Safety (FOCUS) survey: FOCUS 3.0 survey wave

Victoria H. Gallogly, Alexandra B. Fisher, Brisa Ney Sánchez, Sandra L. Bloom, Jennifer Taylor, Jin Lee, Ashley M. Geczik, Suzy B. Gulliver, Madison E. Raposa
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The Fire service Organizational Culture of Safety (FOCUS) survey, is an industry-specific assessment tool used to examine aspects of safety climate and leadership, safety behaviors, organizational outcomes, and mental health outcomes. The FOCUS survey provides participating U.S. fire departments with critical information to improve their work environment. The current iteration of the survey (FOCUS 3.0) includes expanded leadership and mental health modules. Methods This study consisted of a convenience sample of 9,078 firefighters nested within 89 fire departments (career, combination, volunteer) who assessed with the FOCUS 3.0 survey wave. A descriptive epidemiologic analysis of the FOCUS 3.0 survey metrics was conducted. We examined individual-level and department-level characteristics for the participating departments as well as average department scores. Pearson correlation matrices identified potential relationships between the survey metrics. Results Of the 9,078 individuals included in our analysis, the majority were male (88.3%), straight (89.7%), non-officers (66.1%), and non-veterans (83.4%). Our sample consisted of majority career departments (67.4%), with an average of 11 stations, and more than 5,000 calls per year (67.4%). Supervisor support for safety scores were on average 14-points higher than management commitment to safety scores. On average, 12% of respondents endorsed depression symptoms, 10% of respondents reported having anxiety symptoms, and 9% of respondents reported having suicidal ideations within the past month. We observed high positive correlations between management commitment to safety and four leadership metrics (participation in decision making, leadership communication, safety-specific transformational leadership, team psychological safety). Additionally, management commitment to safety was highly negatively correlated with emotional exhaustion (burnout), intent to leave the profession, and mental health metrics. Conclusions The findings from this study of FOCUS 3.0 departments are consistent with prior FOCUS waves (beta-test, 1.0, and 2.0). This study identified that the newly added leadership metrics are highly correlated with safety climate metrics. Thus, they may be avenues for departments to improve their organizational safety climate. This study provides an important first look into the proportion of firefighters who participated in FOCUS 3.0 that experience mental health symptoms. Future research should further investigate the mental health metrics and relationships with safety climate.

Injury EpidemiologyVol. 13(1)
New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (US), Kansas State University (US), Baylor Scott & White Health (US), Drexel University (US)
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Occupational Health and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.