Real-world comparison of enzalutamide and darolutamide for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A multicenter retrospective study.

e17048 Background: Although enzalutamide and darolutamide share a common mechanism of action targeting the androgen receptor pathway, they differ in their molecular structure and pharmacological properties, which may influence their efficacy and safety. However, real-world evidence directly comparing these agents in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) remains limited. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, data from 198 patients who received enzalutamide or darolutamide as their first androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) during treatment for nmCRPC, were analyzed. Adverse events (AEs) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses were compared. Progression of PSA and development of metastases were assessed using the Fine-Gray sub-distribution hazards model, adjusting for death as a competing risk. Results: In the cohort, 94 (47%) patients received enzalutamide and 104 (53%) received darolutamide. Incidence rates of any-grade AEs and grade ≥3 AEs were similar between the two groups ( P = 0.968 and P = 1.000, respectively). The rates of any PSA response, decline in PSA ≥50%, and decline in PSA ≥90% did not differ significantly between the two groups ( P = 0.130, P = 0.687, and P = 0.171, respectively). In multivariable analyses, ARSI type was not significantly associated with progression of PSA (reference, enzalutamide; sub-distribution hazard ratio [SHR], 1.153; P = 0.620) or development of metastases (reference, enzalutamide; SHR, 0.815; P = 0.510). Conclusions: Enzalutamide and darolutamide had comparable safety and oncological outcomes in patients with nmCRPC. These findings support the use of either agent as an appropriate first ARSI treatment. Multivariable analysis for progression of PSA. Factor P value SHR 95% CI Biopsy Gleason score ≥8 0.120 1.857 0.859–4.015 Clinical stage at initial diagnosis cT4 or cN1 0.420 1.290 0.694–2.397 History of radical treatment Positive 0.073 0.594 0.036–1.051 Number of therapies prior to ARSI treatment Continuous 0.210 1.197 0.903–1.588 PSA doubling time <3.3 months 0.078 1.606 0.949–2.720 Relative dose intensity Continuous 0.660 1.377 0.325–5.831 ARSI type Darolutamide 0.620 1.153 0.659–2.018 ARSI, androgen receptor signaling inhibitor; CI, confidence interval; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; SHR, sub-distribution hazard ratio.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.e17048
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world comparison of enzalutamide and darolutamide for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A multicenter retrospective study.

Yohei Kawashima, Satoshi Sato, Shingo Hatakeyama, Masanao Shinohara et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
article

Real-world comparison of enzalutamide and darolutamide for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A multicenter retrospective study.

Yohei Kawashima, Satoshi Sato, Shingo Hatakeyama, Masanao Shinohara, Naoki Fujita
article en

Abstract

e17048 Background: Although enzalutamide and darolutamide share a common mechanism of action targeting the androgen receptor pathway, they differ in their molecular structure and pharmacological properties, which may influence their efficacy and safety. However, real-world evidence directly comparing these agents in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) remains limited. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, data from 198 patients who received enzalutamide or darolutamide as their first androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) during treatment for nmCRPC, were analyzed. Adverse events (AEs) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses were compared. Progression of PSA and development of metastases were assessed using the Fine-Gray sub-distribution hazards model, adjusting for death as a competing risk. Results: In the cohort, 94 (47%) patients received enzalutamide and 104 (53%) received darolutamide. Incidence rates of any-grade AEs and grade ≥3 AEs were similar between the two groups ( P = 0.968 and P = 1.000, respectively). The rates of any PSA response, decline in PSA ≥50%, and decline in PSA ≥90% did not differ significantly between the two groups ( P = 0.130, P = 0.687, and P = 0.171, respectively). In multivariable analyses, ARSI type was not significantly associated with progression of PSA (reference, enzalutamide; sub-distribution hazard ratio [SHR], 1.153; P = 0.620) or development of metastases (reference, enzalutamide; SHR, 0.815; P = 0.510). Conclusions: Enzalutamide and darolutamide had comparable safety and oncological outcomes in patients with nmCRPC. These findings support the use of either agent as an appropriate first ARSI treatment. Multivariable analysis for progression of PSA. Factor P value SHR 95% CI Biopsy Gleason score ≥8 0.120 1.857 0.859–4.015 Clinical stage at initial diagnosis cT4 or cN1 0.420 1.290 0.694–2.397 History of radical treatment Positive 0.073 0.594 0.036–1.051 Number of therapies prior to ARSI treatment Continuous 0.210 1.197 0.903–1.588 PSA doubling time <3.3 months 0.078 1.606 0.949–2.720 Relative dose intensity Continuous 0.660 1.377 0.325–5.831 ARSI type Darolutamide 0.620 1.153 0.659–2.018 ARSI, androgen receptor signaling inhibitor; CI, confidence interval; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; SHR, sub-distribution hazard ratio.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Hirosaki University (JP), Hakodate Central General Hospital (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.