Towards Accurate Pollutant Exposure Assessment: Quantifying the Role of Phase Difference

Phase misalignment between periodic pollutant emissions and receptor inhalation can fundamentally bias exposure estimations, yet it is rarely quantified in transient assessments. Here we propose Phase-Independent Pollutant Exposure (PIPE), a general exposure metric that removes this temporal randomness by integrating phase-resolved exposure over a phase-difference probability distribution. The phase-dependent exposure function is reconstructed efficiently using a Fourier series surrogate built from sparse samples, enabling deterministic calculation of the expected exposure without resource-demanding Monte Carlo sampling. We demonstrate the framework using a short-range indoor exposure case representative of periodic human emissions resolved by transient computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Results showed that across multiple breathing intensities, breathing/coughing waveforms, interpersonal distances (0.5–1.5 m), and exposure durations, phase-dependent variability was consistently pronounced and accurately captured by the proposed model. Phase differences increased cumulative inhaled exposure by up to 9.58 times, with the largest amplification occurring at close range (0.5 m) under intense breathing. Flow-field analysis indicates that specific phase relationships can suppress turbulent kinetic energy in the inter-person region, limiting dispersion and thereby elevating near-field concentrations and intake. Although phase effects attenuate with time due to accumulation and mixing, they remain non-negligible even over extended contact (up to 60 s). Notably, PIPE is generally lower than exposure under perfectly synchronized phases, but becomes 1.20–4.97 times higher in close-range, high-intensity scenarios. By explicitly accounting for phase uncertainty, PIPE provides a transferable and computationally efficient methodology to stabilize exposure assessment for periodic sources, improving the robustness of process-based risk metrics relevant to environmental and human exposure evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16112165
Primary Topic
Infection Control and Ventilation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards Accurate Pollutant Exposure Assessment: Quantifying the Role of Phase Difference

Wenguo Weng, Jialin Wu, Sheng He, Feifan He et al.
Buildings
Infection Control and Ventilation
article

Towards Accurate Pollutant Exposure Assessment: Quantifying the Role of Phase Difference

Wenguo Weng, Jialin Wu, Sheng He, Feifan He, Ming Fu, Kaixin Shen
article en

Abstract

Phase misalignment between periodic pollutant emissions and receptor inhalation can fundamentally bias exposure estimations, yet it is rarely quantified in transient assessments. Here we propose Phase-Independent Pollutant Exposure (PIPE), a general exposure metric that removes this temporal randomness by integrating phase-resolved exposure over a phase-difference probability distribution. The phase-dependent exposure function is reconstructed efficiently using a Fourier series surrogate built from sparse samples, enabling deterministic calculation of the expected exposure without resource-demanding Monte Carlo sampling. We demonstrate the framework using a short-range indoor exposure case representative of periodic human emissions resolved by transient computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Results showed that across multiple breathing intensities, breathing/coughing waveforms, interpersonal distances (0.5–1.5 m), and exposure durations, phase-dependent variability was consistently pronounced and accurately captured by the proposed model. Phase differences increased cumulative inhaled exposure by up to 9.58 times, with the largest amplification occurring at close range (0.5 m) under intense breathing. Flow-field analysis indicates that specific phase relationships can suppress turbulent kinetic energy in the inter-person region, limiting dispersion and thereby elevating near-field concentrations and intake. Although phase effects attenuate with time due to accumulation and mixing, they remain non-negligible even over extended contact (up to 60 s). Notably, PIPE is generally lower than exposure under perfectly synchronized phases, but becomes 1.20–4.97 times higher in close-range, high-intensity scenarios. By explicitly accounting for phase uncertainty, PIPE provides a transferable and computationally efficient methodology to stabilize exposure assessment for periodic sources, improving the robustness of process-based risk metrics relevant to environmental and human exposure evaluation.

BuildingsVol. 16(11)
Nanjing Tech University (CN), Hefei University (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Infection Control and Ventilation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.