Enforcement Design in EU Digital Regulation: Lessons for the Digital Fairness Act

Abstract While the legislative text of the Digital Fairness Act (DFA) has not yet been published, it is already clear that its effectiveness will depend as much on its enforcement design as on the content of its substantive provisions. Experience with recent instruments – including the Digital Services Act, the Digital Markets Act, the Artificial Intelligence Act and the Data Act – reveals persistent difficulties in ensuring consistent and timely enforcement across Member States. Building on the findings of the Commission’s Fitness Check of EU Consumer Law on Digital Fairness , this article examines how the enforcement design developed in these legal acts can inform the institutional and procedural design of the DFA. It argues that the challenges identified by the Digital Fitness Check reflect deeper patterns of procedural, institutional and epistemic fragmentation in EU enforcement. By analysing how different enforcement designs address these tensions through mechanisms of centralisation, coordination and capacity-building, the article identifies key design choices that may shape the emerging enforcement framework of the DFA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Risk Regulation
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2026.10108
Primary Topic
European and International Contract Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enforcement Design in EU Digital Regulation: Lessons for the Digital Fairness Act

Joanna Mazur, Laura Zoboli
European Journal of Risk Regulation
European and International Contract Law
article

Enforcement Design in EU Digital Regulation: Lessons for the Digital Fairness Act

Joanna Mazur, Laura Zoboli
article en

Abstract

Abstract While the legislative text of the Digital Fairness Act (DFA) has not yet been published, it is already clear that its effectiveness will depend as much on its enforcement design as on the content of its substantive provisions. Experience with recent instruments – including the Digital Services Act, the Digital Markets Act, the Artificial Intelligence Act and the Data Act – reveals persistent difficulties in ensuring consistent and timely enforcement across Member States. Building on the findings of the Commission’s Fitness Check of EU Consumer Law on Digital Fairness , this article examines how the enforcement design developed in these legal acts can inform the institutional and procedural design of the DFA. It argues that the challenges identified by the Digital Fitness Check reflect deeper patterns of procedural, institutional and epistemic fragmentation in EU enforcement. By analysing how different enforcement designs address these tensions through mechanisms of centralisation, coordination and capacity-building, the article identifies key design choices that may shape the emerging enforcement framework of the DFA.

European Journal of Risk Regulation
IE University (ES), University of Warsaw (PL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
European and International Contract Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.