Upfront surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

e16472 Background: There is no clear consensus regarding treatment sequence for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Upfront resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant therapy are two acceptable treatment options. We compared outcomes of upfront surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery using retrospectively collected data at our stand-alone cancer center. Methods: We analyzed a total of 240 resectable patients with PDAC who were retrospectively enrolled in an institutional REDCap database from 2017-2024. After excluding patients who underwent palliation (n = 34) and those whose surgeries were performed outside the institution (n = 13), 193 patients were included. Patients were categorized into two groups: upfront resection (UR, n = 91) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by resection (NAC, n = 102). Clinicopathologic variables, perioperative outcomes, and overall survival were compared. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to evaluate survival differences and identify independent prognostic factors. Results: 193 patients were included in the study. 91 (47.2%) underwent upfront resection and 102 (52.8%) were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Median overall survival was 38.8 months in the upfront resection population versus 22.5 months for patients in the neoadjuvant cohort (log-rank p = 0.064). On multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis for overall survival, higher baseline CA19-9 (HR 1.047, 95% CI 1.004-1.092; p = 0.033) and greater Charlson-Deyo comorbidity burden (p = 0.030) were independently associated with worse survival whereas association with treatment sequence was not statistically significant (p = 0.087). In the neoadjuvant cohort, 31 patients (30.4%) did not undergo surgical resection due to disease progression, decline in performance status, patient refusal, or loss to follow-up. Conclusions: In patients with resectable PDAC at a stand-alone cancer center, both upfront surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy are acceptable treatment options. Evaluation of early recurrence in a subgroup of patients receiving upfront surgery suggests more careful consideration of treatment sequence may benefit outcomes. Attrition in the neoadjuvant cohort suggests potential opportunities to improve selection or implement targeted interventions to facilitate patient navigation through complex multidisciplinary therapy. Multivariate cox models - overall survival. Multivariate Cox Models - Overall Survival HR 2.50% 97.50% Overall P-Value Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Total Score 1 0.7141 0.4386 1.163 0.02965 2-3 1.573 0.9868 2.506 4+ 1.605 0.5621 4.585 Baseline CA19-9 1.047 1.004 1.0924 0.03266

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.e16472
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Upfront surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Leonid Cherkassky, Fatemeh Fekrmandi, Kayla Catalfamo, Donna Olewniczak et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Upfront surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Leonid Cherkassky, Fatemeh Fekrmandi, Kayla Catalfamo, Donna Olewniczak, Anuradha Krishnamurthy, Moshim Kukar, Kannan Thanikachalam, Mashaal Dhir, Benjamin F. Calvo, Tyce Schneider, Zachary Stiles, Christos Fountzilas, Aqsa Anwar, Han Yu
article en

Abstract

e16472 Background: There is no clear consensus regarding treatment sequence for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Upfront resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant therapy are two acceptable treatment options. We compared outcomes of upfront surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery using retrospectively collected data at our stand-alone cancer center. Methods: We analyzed a total of 240 resectable patients with PDAC who were retrospectively enrolled in an institutional REDCap database from 2017-2024. After excluding patients who underwent palliation (n = 34) and those whose surgeries were performed outside the institution (n = 13), 193 patients were included. Patients were categorized into two groups: upfront resection (UR, n = 91) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by resection (NAC, n = 102). Clinicopathologic variables, perioperative outcomes, and overall survival were compared. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to evaluate survival differences and identify independent prognostic factors. Results: 193 patients were included in the study. 91 (47.2%) underwent upfront resection and 102 (52.8%) were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Median overall survival was 38.8 months in the upfront resection population versus 22.5 months for patients in the neoadjuvant cohort (log-rank p = 0.064). On multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis for overall survival, higher baseline CA19-9 (HR 1.047, 95% CI 1.004-1.092; p = 0.033) and greater Charlson-Deyo comorbidity burden (p = 0.030) were independently associated with worse survival whereas association with treatment sequence was not statistically significant (p = 0.087). In the neoadjuvant cohort, 31 patients (30.4%) did not undergo surgical resection due to disease progression, decline in performance status, patient refusal, or loss to follow-up. Conclusions: In patients with resectable PDAC at a stand-alone cancer center, both upfront surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy are acceptable treatment options. Evaluation of early recurrence in a subgroup of patients receiving upfront surgery suggests more careful consideration of treatment sequence may benefit outcomes. Attrition in the neoadjuvant cohort suggests potential opportunities to improve selection or implement targeted interventions to facilitate patient navigation through complex multidisciplinary therapy. Multivariate cox models - overall survival. Multivariate Cox Models - Overall Survival HR 2.50% 97.50% Overall P-Value Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Total Score 1 0.7141 0.4386 1.163 0.02965 2-3 1.573 0.9868 2.506 4+ 1.605 0.5621 4.585 Baseline CA19-9 1.047 1.004 1.0924 0.03266

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.