Integrated lifecycle cost analysis ( <scp>ILCCA</scp> ) framework for infrastructure systems

Abstract The transition towards net‐zero carbon infrastructures necessitates decision‐making frameworks that integrate economic performance with environmental externalities. Conventional Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) evaluates financial costs but does not account for carbon emissions, while Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) quantifies environmental impacts without enabling direct economic comparison. This study proposes an Integrated Life Cycle Cost Analysis (ILCCA) framework that combines Life Cycle Economic Cost (LCEC) and monetized Life Cycle Carbon Cost (LCCC) into a unified decision metric. The methodology adopts a cradle‐to‐grave system boundary (Modules A–D) consistent with ISO 15686‐5 and EN 15978, incorporating capital, maintenance, user, and end‐of‐life (EoL) stages. Carbon emissions across all life cycle stages are monetized using a time‐dependent carbon price and discounted to present value, enabling direct aggregation with economic costs. The framework is demonstrated through a comparative case study of two bridge alternatives: a concrete deck bridge, and a steel composite deck bridge. Results indicate that while the steel alternative exhibits higher recyclability benefits, the concrete bridge achieves a lower Integrated Life Cycle Cost (ILCC) due to reduced initial and maintenance costs. Sensitivity analysis shows that increasing carbon price narrows the cost gap between alternatives, highlighting the influence of carbon monetization on design decisions. The proposed ILCCA framework provides a practical decision‐support tool for climate‐aligned infrastructure planning, enabling transparent evaluation of cost–carbon trade‐offs and supporting sustainable procurement and policy formulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Structural Concrete
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.70651
Primary Topic
Concrete Corrosion and Durability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrated lifecycle cost analysis ( ILCCA ) framework for infrastructure systems

V. N. Heggade
Structural Concrete
Concrete Corrosion and Durability
article

Integrated lifecycle cost analysis ( ILCCA ) framework for infrastructure systems

V. N. Heggade
article en

Abstract

Abstract The transition towards net‐zero carbon infrastructures necessitates decision‐making frameworks that integrate economic performance with environmental externalities. Conventional Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) evaluates financial costs but does not account for carbon emissions, while Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) quantifies environmental impacts without enabling direct economic comparison. This study proposes an Integrated Life Cycle Cost Analysis (ILCCA) framework that combines Life Cycle Economic Cost (LCEC) and monetized Life Cycle Carbon Cost (LCCC) into a unified decision metric. The methodology adopts a cradle‐to‐grave system boundary (Modules A–D) consistent with ISO 15686‐5 and EN 15978, incorporating capital, maintenance, user, and end‐of‐life (EoL) stages. Carbon emissions across all life cycle stages are monetized using a time‐dependent carbon price and discounted to present value, enabling direct aggregation with economic costs. The framework is demonstrated through a comparative case study of two bridge alternatives: a concrete deck bridge, and a steel composite deck bridge. Results indicate that while the steel alternative exhibits higher recyclability benefits, the concrete bridge achieves a lower Integrated Life Cycle Cost (ILCC) due to reduced initial and maintenance costs. Sensitivity analysis shows that increasing carbon price narrows the cost gap between alternatives, highlighting the influence of carbon monetization on design decisions. The proposed ILCCA framework provides a practical decision‐support tool for climate‐aligned infrastructure planning, enabling transparent evaluation of cost–carbon trade‐offs and supporting sustainable procurement and policy formulation.

Structural Concrete
Cognizant (India) (IN)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Concrete Corrosion and Durability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.