Vertical Ontology of Civilization: An Axiomatic Model of Symbolic Structure and Linguistic Cosmology

This article proposes a formalized axiomatic framework for interpreting civilization as a structured system of symbolic orientation rather than a purely historical or material process. The model introduces the concepts of Verticality and Horizontality as two fundamental regimes of meaning organization, and defines “Cosmos” as a structural field of differentiations rather than a physical container. Within this framework, language is treated as a primary interface of ontological articulation rather than a secondary representational tool. A key conceptual operator, termed “the Moon,” is introduced as a boundary-symbol regulating transitions between integrative and distributed modes of interpretation. The model does not claim empirical validity in the natural sciences but instead establishes a meta-ontological structure for analyzing the formation of coherent meaning systems across cultural, historical, and cognitive domains. The axiomatic system is developed through a set of definitions, core axioms, and derived propositions, allowing for internal consistency and structural inference. The goal of the framework is to describe the conditions under which symbolic coherence emerges and dissolves within civilizational processes. This approach situates the work at the intersection of philosophy of language, phenomenology, symbolic anthropology, and metaphysical systems theory.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20431715
Primary Topic
Embodied and Extended Cognition
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Vertical Ontology of Civilization: An Axiomatic Model of Symbolic Structure and Linguistic Cosmology

Oleg V. Yermakov
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Embodied and Extended Cognition
preprint

Vertical Ontology of Civilization: An Axiomatic Model of Symbolic Structure and Linguistic Cosmology

Oleg V. Yermakov
preprint en

Abstract

This article proposes a formalized axiomatic framework for interpreting civilization as a structured system of symbolic orientation rather than a purely historical or material process. The model introduces the concepts of Verticality and Horizontality as two fundamental regimes of meaning organization, and defines “Cosmos” as a structural field of differentiations rather than a physical container. Within this framework, language is treated as a primary interface of ontological articulation rather than a secondary representational tool. A key conceptual operator, termed “the Moon,” is introduced as a boundary-symbol regulating transitions between integrative and distributed modes of interpretation. The model does not claim empirical validity in the natural sciences but instead establishes a meta-ontological structure for analyzing the formation of coherent meaning systems across cultural, historical, and cognitive domains. The axiomatic system is developed through a set of definitions, core axioms, and derived propositions, allowing for internal consistency and structural inference. The goal of the framework is to describe the conditions under which symbolic coherence emerges and dissolves within civilizational processes. This approach situates the work at the intersection of philosophy of language, phenomenology, symbolic anthropology, and metaphysical systems theory.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Embodied and Extended Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.