Racial disparities in cancer-specific survival of estrogen receptor–negative, progesterone receptor–positive breast cancer: A focus on the American Indian population.

e12708 Background: Estrogen receptor–negative, progesterone receptor–positive (ER−/PR+) breast cancer is a raresubtype (2–8% of cases) that remains biologically incompletely characterized. Prior studiessuggest aggressive behavior and shared molecular and morphologic features with triple-negativebreast cancer, yet racial and ethnic disparities in outcomes, particularly among AmericanIndian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) patients, are poorly defined. We used population-based data tocompare cancer-specific survival (CSS) between ER−/PR+ and ER+/PR+ breast cancer acrossracial and ethnic groups. Methods: Female patients with first primary invasive, HER2-negative, PR-positive breast cancer diagnosedbetween 2010 and 2022 were identified from the SEER 17 database. ER status was classified aspositive or negative; PR-negative, borderline, and unknown cases were excluded. Patientsidentified by death certificate only or autopsy only were excluded from survival analyses. CSSwas estimated using Kaplan–Meier methods. Cox proportional hazards models compared ER-negative versus ER-positive disease, adjusting for age, stage, and year of diagnosis, and werestratified by race/ethnicity. Analyses were conducted using SEER*Stat v9.0.42.0 and SAS v9.4. Results: Across the cohort, ER-negative status was associated with inferior CSS compared with ER-positive disease (adjusted HR 3.3, 95% CI 3.1–3.6; p<0.001). This association was observedacross all racial and ethnic groups. Adjusted HRs were 3.5 for non-Hispanic Whites, 2.4 for non-Hispanic Blacks, and 2.5 for AI/AN patients, though estimates for AI/AN patients were limitedby small sample size and wider confidence intervals. Notably, ER-positive disease demonstratedexcellent five-year CSS among AI/AN patients, comparable to that observed in White patients. Conclusions: In this population-based analysis of PR-positive breast cancer, ER-negative status was associatedwith worse cancer-specific survival across racial and ethnic groups. ER-positive disease wasassociated with favorable outcomes among AI/AN patients compared to outcomes observed inWhites, challenging assumptions of uniformly poor prognosis in this population. These findingshighlight heterogeneity within PR-positive breast cancer and underscore the need for furtherstudy in understudied populations. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards models for breast cancer–specific survival comparing ER-negative versus ER-positive disease within progesterone receptor–positive breast cancer stratified by race/ethnicity. Group HR (95% CI) P-value Overall (adjusted) 3.3 (3.1–3.6) <0.001 Non-Hispanic White 3.5 (3.2–3.9) <0.001 Non-Hispanic Black 2.4 (2.0–2.8) <0.001 American Indian/Alaska Native 2.5 (1.1–5.9) 0.032 Asian/Pacific Islander 2.4 (1.7–3.3) <0.001 Hispanic (all races) 3.5 (3.0–4.2) <0.001

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.e12708
Primary Topic
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Racial disparities in cancer-specific survival of estrogen receptor–negative, progesterone receptor–positive breast cancer: A focus on the American Indian population.

Swetha Siddappa Yadav, Supriya Koya, Aditya Bala, Maribeth Mead et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
article

Racial disparities in cancer-specific survival of estrogen receptor–negative, progesterone receptor–positive breast cancer: A focus on the American Indian population.

Swetha Siddappa Yadav, Supriya Koya, Aditya Bala, Maribeth Mead, Sreeja Ponnam, Nitya Ponnam, Dorothy Rhoades, Kai Ding
article en

Abstract

e12708 Background: Estrogen receptor–negative, progesterone receptor–positive (ER−/PR+) breast cancer is a raresubtype (2–8% of cases) that remains biologically incompletely characterized. Prior studiessuggest aggressive behavior and shared molecular and morphologic features with triple-negativebreast cancer, yet racial and ethnic disparities in outcomes, particularly among AmericanIndian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) patients, are poorly defined. We used population-based data tocompare cancer-specific survival (CSS) between ER−/PR+ and ER+/PR+ breast cancer acrossracial and ethnic groups. Methods: Female patients with first primary invasive, HER2-negative, PR-positive breast cancer diagnosedbetween 2010 and 2022 were identified from the SEER 17 database. ER status was classified aspositive or negative; PR-negative, borderline, and unknown cases were excluded. Patientsidentified by death certificate only or autopsy only were excluded from survival analyses. CSSwas estimated using Kaplan–Meier methods. Cox proportional hazards models compared ER-negative versus ER-positive disease, adjusting for age, stage, and year of diagnosis, and werestratified by race/ethnicity. Analyses were conducted using SEER*Stat v9.0.42.0 and SAS v9.4. Results: Across the cohort, ER-negative status was associated with inferior CSS compared with ER-positive disease (adjusted HR 3.3, 95% CI 3.1–3.6; p<0.001). This association was observedacross all racial and ethnic groups. Adjusted HRs were 3.5 for non-Hispanic Whites, 2.4 for non-Hispanic Blacks, and 2.5 for AI/AN patients, though estimates for AI/AN patients were limitedby small sample size and wider confidence intervals. Notably, ER-positive disease demonstratedexcellent five-year CSS among AI/AN patients, comparable to that observed in White patients. Conclusions: In this population-based analysis of PR-positive breast cancer, ER-negative status was associatedwith worse cancer-specific survival across racial and ethnic groups. ER-positive disease wasassociated with favorable outcomes among AI/AN patients compared to outcomes observed inWhites, challenging assumptions of uniformly poor prognosis in this population. These findingshighlight heterogeneity within PR-positive breast cancer and underscore the need for furtherstudy in understudied populations. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards models for breast cancer–specific survival comparing ER-negative versus ER-positive disease within progesterone receptor–positive breast cancer stratified by race/ethnicity. Group HR (95% CI) P-value Overall (adjusted) 3.3 (3.1–3.6) <0.001 Non-Hispanic White 3.5 (3.2–3.9) <0.001 Non-Hispanic Black 2.4 (2.0–2.8) <0.001 American Indian/Alaska Native 2.5 (1.1–5.9) 0.032 Asian/Pacific Islander 2.4 (1.7–3.3) <0.001 Hispanic (all races) 3.5 (3.0–4.2) <0.001

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Williams (United States) (US), Oklahoma City University (US), Oklahoma City Community College (US), University of Nebraska at Kearney (US), Oklahoma State University Oklahoma City (US), OU Health Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US), University of Missouri–Kansas City (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.