Social determinants of health and survival outcomes in metastatic breast cancer (MBC): Retrospective analysis from a major Canadian cancer centre.

e13758 Background: Social determines of health (SDOH), including geography and sociodemographic factors influence cancer outcomes, even in publicly funded healthcare systems. However, evaluation is limited by inconsistent data collection. We examined survival outcomes among patients with MBC across regional health care authorities (HCA) in British Columbia (BC), Canada, focusing on available sociodemographic data, including self-reported race and ethnicity. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with MBC between 2014-2017 across BC HCAs using a prospective provincial cancer database. Sociodemographic variables, including self-reported race and ethnicity, were manually abstracted from clinical intake and consultation records and categorized according to Canadian Cancer Clinical Trials Network (3CTN) guidelines. Endpoints were 5-year breast cancer specific (BCSS) and overall survival (OS), estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared with log-rank tests. Results: Among 1917 eligible patients, 513 (26%) had missing self-reported race and ethnicity data, most commonly due to non-disclosure. Patient demographics reflected the 2021 provincial census, with White and East Asian patients comprising the largest groups (54.7% and 7.4%). No significant differences in BCSS and OS were observed across racial and ethnic groups (p = 0.2), though interpretation was limited by missing data. Survival varied by geography: patients treated in the urban HCA had higher 5-year OS relative to those treated in more remote HCAs (Table 1). No significant differences in BCSS were observed by HCA. Conclusions: Within a large, publicly funded cancer system, urban geography was associated with improved OS in MBC, highlighting geography as a key SDOH. The absence of BCSS differences may reflect standardized treatment delivery and competing non-cancer comorbidities. Although no survival differences by race or ethnicity were identified, substantial missing data limits definitive conclusions. These findings underscore the importance of standardized, prospective collection of sociodemographic and comorbidity data to inform equitable cancer care delivery. Further work is needed to clarify drivers of regional variation, including local treatment availability, clinical trial access and patient-level factors influencing treatment uptake. Five-year breast cancer mortality and overall mortality across regional HCA. 5-year Breast Cancer Mortality (95% CI) 5-year Overall Mortality (95% CI) Health authority 1 (urban) 70.0 (65.5, 74.0) 27.8 (23.9, 32.3) 2 76.0 (71.5, 79.9) 22.3 (18.6, 26.7) 3 76.6 (73.1, 79.7) 19.3 (16.4, 22.6) 4 76.3 (71.4, 80.6) 18.6 (14.8, 23.2) 5 69.8 (59.4, 78.0) 22.9 (15.9, 33.1)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.e13758
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social determinants of health and survival outcomes in metastatic breast cancer (MBC): Retrospective analysis from a major Canadian cancer centre.

Bonnie Leung, Caroline Lohrisch, Nathalie LeVasseur, Anshini Shah et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Social determinants of health and survival outcomes in metastatic breast cancer (MBC): Retrospective analysis from a major Canadian cancer centre.

Bonnie Leung, Caroline Lohrisch, Nathalie LeVasseur, Anshini Shah, Emily Jackson, Alan Nichol, Stephen K.L. Chia, Caroline Speers, Jenny Yang, Richard Musoke
article en

Abstract

e13758 Background: Social determines of health (SDOH), including geography and sociodemographic factors influence cancer outcomes, even in publicly funded healthcare systems. However, evaluation is limited by inconsistent data collection. We examined survival outcomes among patients with MBC across regional health care authorities (HCA) in British Columbia (BC), Canada, focusing on available sociodemographic data, including self-reported race and ethnicity. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with MBC between 2014-2017 across BC HCAs using a prospective provincial cancer database. Sociodemographic variables, including self-reported race and ethnicity, were manually abstracted from clinical intake and consultation records and categorized according to Canadian Cancer Clinical Trials Network (3CTN) guidelines. Endpoints were 5-year breast cancer specific (BCSS) and overall survival (OS), estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared with log-rank tests. Results: Among 1917 eligible patients, 513 (26%) had missing self-reported race and ethnicity data, most commonly due to non-disclosure. Patient demographics reflected the 2021 provincial census, with White and East Asian patients comprising the largest groups (54.7% and 7.4%). No significant differences in BCSS and OS were observed across racial and ethnic groups (p = 0.2), though interpretation was limited by missing data. Survival varied by geography: patients treated in the urban HCA had higher 5-year OS relative to those treated in more remote HCAs (Table 1). No significant differences in BCSS were observed by HCA. Conclusions: Within a large, publicly funded cancer system, urban geography was associated with improved OS in MBC, highlighting geography as a key SDOH. The absence of BCSS differences may reflect standardized treatment delivery and competing non-cancer comorbidities. Although no survival differences by race or ethnicity were identified, substantial missing data limits definitive conclusions. These findings underscore the importance of standardized, prospective collection of sociodemographic and comorbidity data to inform equitable cancer care delivery. Further work is needed to clarify drivers of regional variation, including local treatment availability, clinical trial access and patient-level factors influencing treatment uptake. Five-year breast cancer mortality and overall mortality across regional HCA. 5-year Breast Cancer Mortality (95% CI) 5-year Overall Mortality (95% CI) Health authority 1 (urban) 70.0 (65.5, 74.0) 27.8 (23.9, 32.3) 2 76.0 (71.5, 79.9) 22.3 (18.6, 26.7) 3 76.6 (73.1, 79.7) 19.3 (16.4, 22.6) 4 76.3 (71.4, 80.6) 18.6 (14.8, 23.2) 5 69.8 (59.4, 78.0) 22.9 (15.9, 33.1)

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
University of British Columbia (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.