Enhanced health evaluation in mice using continuous home-cage monitoring and machine learning: a multicentric study

Abstract Ensuring the health of laboratory rodents is critical for ethical research and maintaining scientific integrity. Traditional daily visual observations by trained technicians, conducted during the rodents’ sleep period, often fail to detect subtle but critical health indicators due to the short duration of inspections and obstructions from enrichment materials. Here we aimed to improve health checks in mice by utilizing continuous home-cage monitoring coupled with machine learning (ML) algorithms. We hypothesized that reduced locomotion in mice would indicate distress or sickness, and that continuous tracking would identify clinical cases earlier than visual checks. We retrospectively analyzed locomotion data from three institutions using the same sensor technology and applied ML/artificial intelligence (AI) models to generate digital alerts for potential clinical cases. These alerts were then compared with clinical records to verify the accuracy of the predictions. Our results demonstrated that the ML algorithm identified animals in distress –3 to –6 days before verifiable clinical signs or death were noticed, with an accuracy of 66–80% on day –3 and 80–91% on day −6. This indicates that continuous monitoring of animal locomotion is a superior predictor of animal health compared with human observation. The findings suggest that augmenting visual checks with AI modeling can greatly improve animal welfare by identifying subclinical cases, enhancing study endpoints, increasing the rigor and reproducibility of research, and improving operational efficiency. Our work underscores the potential of integrating advanced monitoring systems and AI in laboratory animal facilities, marking a substantial step forward in the field of animal welfare and research methodology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lab Animal
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41684-026-01745-2
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhanced health evaluation in mice using continuous home-cage monitoring and machine learning: a multicentric study

Mara Rigamonti, Stefano Gaburro, Xavier Warot, Giorgio Rosati et al.
Lab Animal
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
article

Enhanced health evaluation in mice using continuous home-cage monitoring and machine learning: a multicentric study

Mara Rigamonti, Stefano Gaburro, Xavier Warot, Giorgio Rosati, Céline Gommet, Laurent Begoud, Michael Zwick, Jeetendra Eswaraka, Dimitri Diomaiuta, Raphaël Doenlen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Ensuring the health of laboratory rodents is critical for ethical research and maintaining scientific integrity. Traditional daily visual observations by trained technicians, conducted during the rodents’ sleep period, often fail to detect subtle but critical health indicators due to the short duration of inspections and obstructions from enrichment materials. Here we aimed to improve health checks in mice by utilizing continuous home-cage monitoring coupled with machine learning (ML) algorithms. We hypothesized that reduced locomotion in mice would indicate distress or sickness, and that continuous tracking would identify clinical cases earlier than visual checks. We retrospectively analyzed locomotion data from three institutions using the same sensor technology and applied ML/artificial intelligence (AI) models to generate digital alerts for potential clinical cases. These alerts were then compared with clinical records to verify the accuracy of the predictions. Our results demonstrated that the ML algorithm identified animals in distress –3 to –6 days before verifiable clinical signs or death were noticed, with an accuracy of 66–80% on day –3 and 80–91% on day −6. This indicates that continuous monitoring of animal locomotion is a superior predictor of animal health compared with human observation. The findings suggest that augmenting visual checks with AI modeling can greatly improve animal welfare by identifying subclinical cases, enhancing study endpoints, increasing the rigor and reproducibility of research, and improving operational efficiency. Our work underscores the potential of integrating advanced monitoring systems and AI in laboratory animal facilities, marking a substantial step forward in the field of animal welfare and research methodology.

Lab Animal
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Sanofi (France) (FR), Ziplast (Italy) (IT), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.