Definitive non-surgical management of locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

e16143 Background: For patients with Locally Advanced Esophageal Adenocarcinoma (LAEA), esophagectomy with perioperative chemo-radiation is the preferred treatment. Esophagectomy, however, is associated with substantial morbidity, with postoperative complication rates approaching 60%. Organ-preserving, esophagectomy-free approaches may reduce treatment-related morbidity but carry a risk of locoregional recurrence. This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of esophagectomy-free treatment approaches for LAEA. Methods: A comprehensive PRISMA-guided systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase, yielding 8 clinical trials evaluating non-surgical treatment strategies in patients with LAEA. Data were extracted, and outcomes were pooled using inverse-variance meta-analysis with logit transformation under random-effects models, with heterogeneity quantified by I² in the R statistical package version 4.4.0. Results: A total of 945 patients were included, of whom 76% were male and 24% female, with a median age of 65.5 (58-72) years. Patients had non-metastatic locally advanced stage II–III disease and good baseline functional status (ECOG/WHO/Zubrod 0–1). Patients were treated with cetuximab plus chemoradiation (CRT) = 413, CRT with weekly carboplatin+paclitaxel = 129, induction chemotherapy (IC) + CRT = 51, pembrolizumab plus CRT = 40, XELOX followed by CRT = 19, IC + radiotherapy (RT) = 17, definitive CRT = 12, definitive RT = 8, and celecoxib plus CRT = 7. The median follow-up period was 22.3 (16-46) months. The pooled complete response rate was 41% (95% CI, 24–60%; I² = 93.3%), and the pooled overall response rate was 42% (95% CI, 32–53%). Pooled 2-and 3-year overall survival rates were 45% (95% CI, 40-49%) and 36% (95% CI, 29-45%; I² = 75.7%), respectively. Median OS was 19.3 (16-47) months. The pooled 2-year PFS was 32% (95% CI, 7-74%; I² = 82.2%), with a median PFS of 11.8 (8.8-24.1) months. Pooled rates of locoregional and distant progression were 41% (95% CI, 33–49%; I² = 65.7%) and 36% (95% CI, 25–48%; I² = 79.1%), respectively. Treatment-related adverse events were variably reported; common grade ≥3 toxicities included hematologic events, pneumonitis, esophagitis, dysphagia, diarrhea, fatigue, and dehydration. The pooled incidence of grade 3–4 neutropenia was 12% (95% CI, 6–22%; I² = 72.5%). Conclusions: Esophagectomy-free treatment strategies demonstrate meaningful clinical activity with acceptable toxicity in selected patients with LAEA. These approaches may offer a viable organ-preserving alternative to standard therapy. Prospective randomized trials are needed to better define patient selection, optimize surveillance strategies, and compare long-term outcomes with surgical approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.e16143
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Definitive non-surgical management of locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Muhammad Kashif Amin, Hassan Awais, Muhammad Mohsin Sial, Nuha Riyad et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Definitive non-surgical management of locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Muhammad Kashif Amin, Hassan Awais, Muhammad Mohsin Sial, Nuha Riyad, Sumbal Aziz, Osama Ewidat, Muhammad Umair Mushtaq, Zobia Farooq, Moazzam Shahzad, Muzammil Khan
article en

Abstract

e16143 Background: For patients with Locally Advanced Esophageal Adenocarcinoma (LAEA), esophagectomy with perioperative chemo-radiation is the preferred treatment. Esophagectomy, however, is associated with substantial morbidity, with postoperative complication rates approaching 60%. Organ-preserving, esophagectomy-free approaches may reduce treatment-related morbidity but carry a risk of locoregional recurrence. This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of esophagectomy-free treatment approaches for LAEA. Methods: A comprehensive PRISMA-guided systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase, yielding 8 clinical trials evaluating non-surgical treatment strategies in patients with LAEA. Data were extracted, and outcomes were pooled using inverse-variance meta-analysis with logit transformation under random-effects models, with heterogeneity quantified by I² in the R statistical package version 4.4.0. Results: A total of 945 patients were included, of whom 76% were male and 24% female, with a median age of 65.5 (58-72) years. Patients had non-metastatic locally advanced stage II–III disease and good baseline functional status (ECOG/WHO/Zubrod 0–1). Patients were treated with cetuximab plus chemoradiation (CRT) = 413, CRT with weekly carboplatin+paclitaxel = 129, induction chemotherapy (IC) + CRT = 51, pembrolizumab plus CRT = 40, XELOX followed by CRT = 19, IC + radiotherapy (RT) = 17, definitive CRT = 12, definitive RT = 8, and celecoxib plus CRT = 7. The median follow-up period was 22.3 (16-46) months. The pooled complete response rate was 41% (95% CI, 24–60%; I² = 93.3%), and the pooled overall response rate was 42% (95% CI, 32–53%). Pooled 2-and 3-year overall survival rates were 45% (95% CI, 40-49%) and 36% (95% CI, 29-45%; I² = 75.7%), respectively. Median OS was 19.3 (16-47) months. The pooled 2-year PFS was 32% (95% CI, 7-74%; I² = 82.2%), with a median PFS of 11.8 (8.8-24.1) months. Pooled rates of locoregional and distant progression were 41% (95% CI, 33–49%; I² = 65.7%) and 36% (95% CI, 25–48%; I² = 79.1%), respectively. Treatment-related adverse events were variably reported; common grade ≥3 toxicities included hematologic events, pneumonitis, esophagitis, dysphagia, diarrhea, fatigue, and dehydration. The pooled incidence of grade 3–4 neutropenia was 12% (95% CI, 6–22%; I² = 72.5%). Conclusions: Esophagectomy-free treatment strategies demonstrate meaningful clinical activity with acceptable toxicity in selected patients with LAEA. These approaches may offer a viable organ-preserving alternative to standard therapy. Prospective randomized trials are needed to better define patient selection, optimize surveillance strategies, and compare long-term outcomes with surgical approaches.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
King Edward Medical University (PK), An-Najah National University (PS), University of South Florida (US), AdventHealth Sebring (US), Moffitt Cancer Center (US), WellSpan Health (US), University of Kansas Medical Center (US), Mayo Hospital (PK), Conway School of Landscape Design (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.