Does the global cancer research funding by public and philanthropic investments address important research gaps?

e23032 Background: Public and philanthropic funding are vital to all domains of cancer research, yet little is known about how the funding landscape has evolved over the years and whether the public investments in cancer research are aligned with disease burden and research priorities. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of cancer research grants recorded in the International Cancer Research Partnership database and European Commission programs from 2007 to 2022. Awards were converted to 2022 US dollars, adjusted for inflation, and classified by cancer site and the six Common Scientific Outline (CSO) categories- biology, etiology, prevention, early detection and diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship and outcomes research. Funding trends were assessed using joinpoint and linear regression. GLOBOCAN 2022 data for incidence, mortality, and mortality-to-incidence ratio (MIR) were extracted to assess alignment of funding amount with cancer burden. Results: Combined public and philanthropic cancer research funding increased from US$7.00 billion in 2007 to US$10.90 billion in 2022 (APC 2.46%). Observed investment in 2022 exceeded the inflation-adjusted projection of 2007 funding (US$9.87 billion). In 2022, funding was highest for treatment (US$3.31 billion), followed by biology (US$2.53 billion). Funding for treatment research constituted the highest proportion and funding for early detection, diagnosis, and prognosis (US$1.85 billion) and prevention (US$0.97 billion) represented a small portion of the total portfolio. Survivorship and outcomes research accounted for US$1.15 billion in 2022 and showed sustained growth over time (APC 2.51%). All categories had significant increases in funding amount per year except for the category of etiology. In 2022, breast cancer accounted for 6.9% of total cancer deaths but received 19.5% of total research funding, whereas upper gastrointestinal cancers represented 13.4% of deaths and received only 3.0% of funding. Funding distribution showed a moderate correlation with incidence (R² 0.41; R 0.64), a weak correlation with mortality (R² 0.10; R 0.32) and no correlation with MIR (R² 0.01; r −0.11). Conclusions: Public and philanthropic investments in cancer research increased from 2007 to 2022 at an annual rate of 2.46%. However, the funding distribution showed disproportionately low funding for the categories of cancer etiology, prevention, and survivorship. Certain tumor types were also likely to be disproportionately less funded relative to their public health burden. Our study highlights the underfunded categories and tumor types to be considered for increased and perhaps, targeted funding as part of future funding decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.e23032
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does the global cancer research funding by public and philanthropic investments address important research gaps?

Kimberly Badovinac, Laure-Anne Teuwen, L F F Silva, Claire Diana-Gonsalves et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Does the global cancer research funding by public and philanthropic investments address important research gaps?

Kimberly Badovinac, Laure-Anne Teuwen, L F F Silva, Claire Diana-Gonsalves, Bishal Gyawali, Lynne Davies, Nicola Hawkes
article en

Abstract

e23032 Background: Public and philanthropic funding are vital to all domains of cancer research, yet little is known about how the funding landscape has evolved over the years and whether the public investments in cancer research are aligned with disease burden and research priorities. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of cancer research grants recorded in the International Cancer Research Partnership database and European Commission programs from 2007 to 2022. Awards were converted to 2022 US dollars, adjusted for inflation, and classified by cancer site and the six Common Scientific Outline (CSO) categories- biology, etiology, prevention, early detection and diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship and outcomes research. Funding trends were assessed using joinpoint and linear regression. GLOBOCAN 2022 data for incidence, mortality, and mortality-to-incidence ratio (MIR) were extracted to assess alignment of funding amount with cancer burden. Results: Combined public and philanthropic cancer research funding increased from US$7.00 billion in 2007 to US$10.90 billion in 2022 (APC 2.46%). Observed investment in 2022 exceeded the inflation-adjusted projection of 2007 funding (US$9.87 billion). In 2022, funding was highest for treatment (US$3.31 billion), followed by biology (US$2.53 billion). Funding for treatment research constituted the highest proportion and funding for early detection, diagnosis, and prognosis (US$1.85 billion) and prevention (US$0.97 billion) represented a small portion of the total portfolio. Survivorship and outcomes research accounted for US$1.15 billion in 2022 and showed sustained growth over time (APC 2.51%). All categories had significant increases in funding amount per year except for the category of etiology. In 2022, breast cancer accounted for 6.9% of total cancer deaths but received 19.5% of total research funding, whereas upper gastrointestinal cancers represented 13.4% of deaths and received only 3.0% of funding. Funding distribution showed a moderate correlation with incidence (R² 0.41; R 0.64), a weak correlation with mortality (R² 0.10; R 0.32) and no correlation with MIR (R² 0.01; r −0.11). Conclusions: Public and philanthropic investments in cancer research increased from 2007 to 2022 at an annual rate of 2.46%. However, the funding distribution showed disproportionately low funding for the categories of cancer etiology, prevention, and survivorship. Certain tumor types were also likely to be disproportionately less funded relative to their public health burden. Our study highlights the underfunded categories and tumor types to be considered for increased and perhaps, targeted funding as part of future funding decisions.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Canadian Cancer Society (CA), Universidade Federal Fluminense (BR), Queen's University (CA), Antwerp University Hospital (BE), World Cancer Research Fund International (GB), AIR Worldwide (United Kingdom) (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.