An Enhanced FAIRed and eXplainable (eFAIR-X) AI Model and Dashboard for Open, Interdisciplinary Computational Research Reproducibility

Computational research is becoming increasingly dependent on code, data, workflows, software environments and model configurations that must be preserved and understood before findings can be reproduced. The FAIR Guiding Principles have significantly improved data stewardship, but they do not by themselves provide an executable, explainable and evidence-linked mechanism for verifying computational claims. This article presents eFAIR-X, an implementation-oriented and AI-enabled extension of FAIR for interdisciplinary computational reproducibility. The framework connects publications, claims, datasets, code, workflows, environments and verification evidence through a semantic research knowledge graph. It also defines a Dashboard for Reproducibility (DfR) that reports bounded, auditable and calibratable indicators for artefact availability, metadata completeness, workflow executability, output agreement, contribution-evidence coverage, relevance longevity and originality risk. In response to the need for stronger technical precision, the model separates three issues that are often combined: FAIR principle extension, FAIR assessment and operational reproducibility verification. A browser-based proof-of-concept prototype has now been implemented and exercised using structured JSON study files to demonstrate the dashboard, knowledge-graph view, evidence table, claim-evidence mapping and validation panel. The proposed metrics are explicitly treated as provisional operational indicators that require calibration through benchmark experiments, expert agreement analysis, case-based evaluation and sensitivity testing before they can be used as decision-support evidence. The paper further specifies local and global explainability mechanisms, human contestability, knowledge-graph node and edge semantics, metadata requirements and dashboard evidence drill-downs. eFAIR-Xis therefore positioned not as a replacement for FAIR, FAIR4RS or FAIRification frameworks, but as a complementary verification-centred infrastructure for making computational reproducibility more measurable, inspectable and actionable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sci
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sci8060124
Primary Topic
Scientific Computing and Data Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Enhanced FAIRed and eXplainable (eFAIR-X) AI Model and Dashboard for Open, Interdisciplinary Computational Research Reproducibility

Michel Belyk, Marcello Trovati, Nik Bessis, Paul Bakaki
Sci
Scientific Computing and Data Management
article

An Enhanced FAIRed and eXplainable (eFAIR-X) AI Model and Dashboard for Open, Interdisciplinary Computational Research Reproducibility

Michel Belyk, Marcello Trovati, Nik Bessis, Paul Bakaki
article en

Abstract

Computational research is becoming increasingly dependent on code, data, workflows, software environments and model configurations that must be preserved and understood before findings can be reproduced. The FAIR Guiding Principles have significantly improved data stewardship, but they do not by themselves provide an executable, explainable and evidence-linked mechanism for verifying computational claims. This article presents eFAIR-X, an implementation-oriented and AI-enabled extension of FAIR for interdisciplinary computational reproducibility. The framework connects publications, claims, datasets, code, workflows, environments and verification evidence through a semantic research knowledge graph. It also defines a Dashboard for Reproducibility (DfR) that reports bounded, auditable and calibratable indicators for artefact availability, metadata completeness, workflow executability, output agreement, contribution-evidence coverage, relevance longevity and originality risk. In response to the need for stronger technical precision, the model separates three issues that are often combined: FAIR principle extension, FAIR assessment and operational reproducibility verification. A browser-based proof-of-concept prototype has now been implemented and exercised using structured JSON study files to demonstrate the dashboard, knowledge-graph view, evidence table, claim-evidence mapping and validation panel. The proposed metrics are explicitly treated as provisional operational indicators that require calibration through benchmark experiments, expert agreement analysis, case-based evaluation and sensitivity testing before they can be used as decision-support evidence. The paper further specifies local and global explainability mechanisms, human contestability, knowledge-graph node and edge semantics, metadata requirements and dashboard evidence drill-downs. eFAIR-Xis therefore positioned not as a replacement for FAIR, FAIR4RS or FAIRification frameworks, but as a complementary verification-centred infrastructure for making computational reproducibility more measurable, inspectable and actionable.

SciVol. 8(6)
Edge Hill University (GB), University of Lancashire (GB)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Scientific Computing and Data Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.