Fit of three-unit anterior fixed dental prosthesis frameworks fabricated by different manufacturing techniques

This in vitro study aimed to evaluate different fabrication techniques for anterior cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) three-unit fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and their effects on the fit of maxillary central incisor and canine abutments. Five fabrication techniques were evaluated as the experimental groups: manual wax carving and casting (Cast), milled wax and casting (CAW), 3D-printed polymers and casting (3DP), direct metal laser sintering (DMLS), and selective laser melting (SLM). Three-unit FDP frameworks were designed for the prepared maxillary central incisor and canine teeth, and Co-Cr specimens were fabricated (n = 10). Marginal (MDV), chamfer (CDV), axial (ADV), incisal (IDV), and overall discrepancy values (ODV) were evaluated using the silicone replica technique (SRT) and statistically analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)(α = 0.05). Fabrication technique significantly affected measurements (p < 0.001), while tooth type did not. No differences in CDV, ADV, or IDV were found between canine and central incisor (P > 0.05). The 3DP technique showed higher MDV, CDV, and ODV than others (P < 0.05), and higher ADV than DMLS and SLM (P < 0.05). For IDV, 3DP had higher values in canine teeth compared to all techniques, and in central teeth compared to Cast, DMLS, and SLM (P < 0.05). SLM showed a more favorable overall discrepancy than the lost-wax technique. Additionally, DMLS offers a comparable and viable alternative for fabricating anterior 3-unit FDP frameworks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-08693-w
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fit of three-unit anterior fixed dental prosthesis frameworks fabricated by different manufacturing techniques

Süleyman Hakan Tuna, Gürel Pekkan, Hilal Gülgezen Aydın, Canan Hekimoğlu
BMC Oral Health
Dental materials and restorations
article

Fit of three-unit anterior fixed dental prosthesis frameworks fabricated by different manufacturing techniques

Süleyman Hakan Tuna, Gürel Pekkan, Hilal Gülgezen Aydın, Canan Hekimoğlu
article en

Abstract

This in vitro study aimed to evaluate different fabrication techniques for anterior cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) three-unit fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and their effects on the fit of maxillary central incisor and canine abutments. Five fabrication techniques were evaluated as the experimental groups: manual wax carving and casting (Cast), milled wax and casting (CAW), 3D-printed polymers and casting (3DP), direct metal laser sintering (DMLS), and selective laser melting (SLM). Three-unit FDP frameworks were designed for the prepared maxillary central incisor and canine teeth, and Co-Cr specimens were fabricated (n = 10). Marginal (MDV), chamfer (CDV), axial (ADV), incisal (IDV), and overall discrepancy values (ODV) were evaluated using the silicone replica technique (SRT) and statistically analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)(α = 0.05). Fabrication technique significantly affected measurements (p < 0.001), while tooth type did not. No differences in CDV, ADV, or IDV were found between canine and central incisor (P > 0.05). The 3DP technique showed higher MDV, CDV, and ODV than others (P < 0.05), and higher ADV than DMLS and SLM (P < 0.05). For IDV, 3DP had higher values in canine teeth compared to all techniques, and in central teeth compared to Cast, DMLS, and SLM (P < 0.05). SLM showed a more favorable overall discrepancy than the lost-wax technique. Additionally, DMLS offers a comparable and viable alternative for fabricating anterior 3-unit FDP frameworks.

BMC Oral Health
Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University (TR), Dokuz Eylül University (TR), Hacettepe University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.