Patient preference for subcutaneous vs. intravenous immune therapy (PSI-Immune).

TPS1678 Background: Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has improved outcomes for patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Conventional intravenous (IV) route of administration (RoA) requires repeated, time-intensive infusions involving cannulation, monitoring, pharmacy preparation, and chair time, increasing treatment burden and constraining infusion center capacity, staffing, and scalability as ICB use expands. Subcutaneous (SC) formulations of pembrolizumab and nivolumab—two widely used PD-1 inhibitors—have recently been approved across multiple indications. PD-1 ICB SC formulations contain the same active drug as IV formulations and have demonstrated comparable PK exposure, efficacy and safety profiles (CheckMate 8KX; 3475A-D77). Beyond pt convenience, SC RoA may enable more scalable delivery by reducing infusion chair utilization, nursing time, and workflow bottlenecks, supporting access across high-volume cancer networks. Real-world pt preference and perceived health-system impact of SC versus IV PD-1 ICB remain incompletely characterized. We therefore designed a distributed, real-world clinical trial to evaluate patient preference and health-system implications of PD-1 ICB RoA across a large integrated cancer network (>70 sites across 4 states). Methods: PSI-Immune is a randomized, phase II, open-label, crossover study evaluating pt preference for SC versus IV RoA of PD-1 ICB in pts with locally advanced (LA) or advanced/metastatic (A/M) solid tumors pending initiation PD-1–based therapy, either as monotherapy or in combination. The primary endpoint is pt preference for ICB RoA, assessed using a validated pt preference questionnaire (PPQ). Key secondary endpoints include pt-reported treatment satisfaction (TASQ), HCP-reported time and resource utilization, pt-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and time to next therapy (TTNT). A subcohort permits enrollment of pts who are already on IV PD-1 ICB. Eligible pts must have an FDA-approved indication for SC pembrolizumab or nivolumab singly or in combination with other FDA-approved agents and a planned duration of PD-1–based therapy exceeding six months. Patients are randomized 1:1 to receive either SC therapy for three cycles followed by IV therapy for three cycles, or the reverse sequence (crossover phase). Subsequently, pts select their preferred route of administration (continuation phase). Treatment regimen is identical across cohorts and differs only by ICB RoA. Randomization is stratified by disease setting (LA vs A/M) and ICB regimen (monotherapy vs combination). The planned sample size is 280 patients. Assuming equal allocation and up to 10% attrition, the exact 95% confidence interval for the proportion of patients preferring SC administration will exclude 50% if the observed preference rate is at least 60%. This study is open and enrolling across the entire UPMC Hillman Cancer Center Network (NCT07223424). Clinical trial information: NCT07223424 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.tps1678
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient preference for subcutaneous vs. intravenous immune therapy (PSI-Immune).

Gauri Kiefer, Vincent Reyes, Diwakar Davar, Dan Paul Zandberg et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

Patient preference for subcutaneous vs. intravenous immune therapy (PSI-Immune).

Gauri Kiefer, Vincent Reyes, Diwakar Davar, Dan Paul Zandberg, Christopher Ritchie Marsh, Kristin Bialobok, Dhaval Mehta, Nishant Tageja, Rushir J. Choksi, Shannon K. Penland, Hong Wang, James Ohr, Jordan Senchak, Jennifer Ruth
article en

Abstract

TPS1678 Background: Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has improved outcomes for patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Conventional intravenous (IV) route of administration (RoA) requires repeated, time-intensive infusions involving cannulation, monitoring, pharmacy preparation, and chair time, increasing treatment burden and constraining infusion center capacity, staffing, and scalability as ICB use expands. Subcutaneous (SC) formulations of pembrolizumab and nivolumab—two widely used PD-1 inhibitors—have recently been approved across multiple indications. PD-1 ICB SC formulations contain the same active drug as IV formulations and have demonstrated comparable PK exposure, efficacy and safety profiles (CheckMate 8KX; 3475A-D77). Beyond pt convenience, SC RoA may enable more scalable delivery by reducing infusion chair utilization, nursing time, and workflow bottlenecks, supporting access across high-volume cancer networks. Real-world pt preference and perceived health-system impact of SC versus IV PD-1 ICB remain incompletely characterized. We therefore designed a distributed, real-world clinical trial to evaluate patient preference and health-system implications of PD-1 ICB RoA across a large integrated cancer network (>70 sites across 4 states). Methods: PSI-Immune is a randomized, phase II, open-label, crossover study evaluating pt preference for SC versus IV RoA of PD-1 ICB in pts with locally advanced (LA) or advanced/metastatic (A/M) solid tumors pending initiation PD-1–based therapy, either as monotherapy or in combination. The primary endpoint is pt preference for ICB RoA, assessed using a validated pt preference questionnaire (PPQ). Key secondary endpoints include pt-reported treatment satisfaction (TASQ), HCP-reported time and resource utilization, pt-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and time to next therapy (TTNT). A subcohort permits enrollment of pts who are already on IV PD-1 ICB. Eligible pts must have an FDA-approved indication for SC pembrolizumab or nivolumab singly or in combination with other FDA-approved agents and a planned duration of PD-1–based therapy exceeding six months. Patients are randomized 1:1 to receive either SC therapy for three cycles followed by IV therapy for three cycles, or the reverse sequence (crossover phase). Subsequently, pts select their preferred route of administration (continuation phase). Treatment regimen is identical across cohorts and differs only by ICB RoA. Randomization is stratified by disease setting (LA vs A/M) and ICB regimen (monotherapy vs combination). The planned sample size is 280 patients. Assuming equal allocation and up to 10% attrition, the exact 95% confidence interval for the proportion of patients preferring SC administration will exclude 50% if the observed preference rate is at least 60%. This study is open and enrolling across the entire UPMC Hillman Cancer Center Network (NCT07223424). Clinical trial information: NCT07223424 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
UPMC Hillman Cancer Center (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.