FEM-aligned weak-form physics-informed neural networks with Laplace–Beltrami geometry encoding for linear elastic surrogate modeling

Reliable prediction of subsurface deformation is central to geo-engineering applications such as geological CO 2 storage and underground hydrogen storage. We propose a finite-element–aligned physics-informed neural network (FEM–PINN) for small-strain linear elasticity. Unlike conventional strong-form PINNs that minimize PDE residuals at collocation points, the FEM–PINN minimizes the total potential energy—a variational (weak-form) objective—that mirrors the structure, numerical quadrature, and post-processing of classical finite element methods (FEM). Geometry is encoded using a compact Laplace–Beltrami eigenbasis computed on the analysis mesh, while training minimizes the total potential energy evaluated consistently at FEM Gauss points. Essential boundary conditions are enforced through smooth architectural gating complemented by light penalty regularization. The framework outputs FEM-grade quantities, including nodal displacements, Gauss-point strains and stresses, von Mises stress, and total potential energy, enabling direct one-to-one comparison with a finite-element baseline. Three benchmarks are examined. A uniaxial compression test is used as a verification case, yielding relative L 2 displacement errors of approximately 7% and energy gaps of 0.2–3.5% across all cases. A second, large-scale prismatic block with free lateral boundaries and a fixed base demonstrates robustness under boundary conditions representative of geomechanical compression scenarios, with displacement errors in the range of 6%–8% and near-unity parity with FEM across all displacement components. A third, quasi-two-dimensional domain with mixed directional boundary conditions is verified, yielding relative L 2 displacement errors of approximately 8%. Stress and strain fields are recovered consistently at Gauss points. A sensitivity study over the eigenmode budget m confirms that LBO encoding is essential for variational consistency: the coordinate-only case ( m = 0 ) yields an energy gap of 137%, whereas m = 24 achieves 0.33%, the best among all configurations tested. Displacement errors vary non-monotonically with m , consistent with the non-convex optimisation landscape at a fixed training budget. By aligning weak-form training, geometry representation, and numerical integration with FEM practice, the proposed FEM–PINN provides a physically interpretable and practical surrogate for geomechanics workflows and offers a natural pathway toward hydro–mechanical coupling via augmented variational formulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Computing and Geosciences
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acags.2026.100354
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FEM-aligned weak-form physics-informed neural networks with Laplace–Beltrami geometry encoding for linear elastic surrogate modeling

Cheng Hsin Liu, Ahmad S. Abushaikha
Applied Computing and Geosciences
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
article

FEM-aligned weak-form physics-informed neural networks with Laplace–Beltrami geometry encoding for linear elastic surrogate modeling

Cheng Hsin Liu, Ahmad S. Abushaikha
article en

Abstract

Reliable prediction of subsurface deformation is central to geo-engineering applications such as geological CO 2 storage and underground hydrogen storage. We propose a finite-element–aligned physics-informed neural network (FEM–PINN) for small-strain linear elasticity. Unlike conventional strong-form PINNs that minimize PDE residuals at collocation points, the FEM–PINN minimizes the total potential energy—a variational (weak-form) objective—that mirrors the structure, numerical quadrature, and post-processing of classical finite element methods (FEM). Geometry is encoded using a compact Laplace–Beltrami eigenbasis computed on the analysis mesh, while training minimizes the total potential energy evaluated consistently at FEM Gauss points. Essential boundary conditions are enforced through smooth architectural gating complemented by light penalty regularization. The framework outputs FEM-grade quantities, including nodal displacements, Gauss-point strains and stresses, von Mises stress, and total potential energy, enabling direct one-to-one comparison with a finite-element baseline. Three benchmarks are examined. A uniaxial compression test is used as a verification case, yielding relative L 2 displacement errors of approximately 7% and energy gaps of 0.2–3.5% across all cases. A second, large-scale prismatic block with free lateral boundaries and a fixed base demonstrates robustness under boundary conditions representative of geomechanical compression scenarios, with displacement errors in the range of 6%–8% and near-unity parity with FEM across all displacement components. A third, quasi-two-dimensional domain with mixed directional boundary conditions is verified, yielding relative L 2 displacement errors of approximately 8%. Stress and strain fields are recovered consistently at Gauss points. A sensitivity study over the eigenmode budget m confirms that LBO encoding is essential for variational consistency: the coordinate-only case ( m = 0 ) yields an energy gap of 137%, whereas m = 24 achieves 0.33%, the best among all configurations tested. Displacement errors vary non-monotonically with m , consistent with the non-convex optimisation landscape at a fixed training budget. By aligning weak-form training, geometry representation, and numerical integration with FEM practice, the proposed FEM–PINN provides a physically interpretable and practical surrogate for geomechanics workflows and offers a natural pathway toward hydro–mechanical coupling via augmented variational formulations.

Applied Computing and GeosciencesVol. 30
Hamad bin Khalifa University (QA)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.