A systematic review and meta-analysis on safety and efficacy of Lu-177 PSMA-617 and standardized treatment in mCRPC from randomized phase II/III trials.

e17069 Background: Lu-177 PSMA-617 delivers targeted β-radiation to prostate cancer cells, offering a distinct mechanism beyond androgen-signaling inhibition in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Pivotal trials have shown improved progression-free survival with favorable tolerability. As its clinical use expands, comparative evidence with established systemic therapies remains limited. This meta-analysis evaluates the pooled efficacy and safety outcomes. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to PRISMA guidelines to evaluate Lu-177 PSMA-617 in mCRPC. Of 456 studies screened, seven met eligibility criteria and were included in the final analysis. Data on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were extracted and pooled using a random-effects model (REML method). Hazard ratios (HRs) and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic, and publication bias was evaluated using both Egger’s regression and Begg’s rank correlation. Results: A total of 2,526 patients from seven randomized trials were analyzed, including 1,365 in the Lu-177 PSMA-617 arms and 1,161 in the standard-of-care arms. Lu-177 PSMA-617 significantly improved PFS compared with control (pooled HR = 0.64; 95% CI 0.50–0.81; p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in OS (HR = 0.91; 95% CI 0.66–1.25; p = 0.55). The pooled RR for grade ≥ 3 AEs was 0.98 (95% CI 0.83–1.14; p = 0.75). Conclusions: Across contemporary randomized trials, Lu-177 PSMA-617 consistently prolongs PFS with no significant difference in AEs. OS benefit remains unconfirmed, likely reflecting post-progression and salvage use of Lu-177 PSMA-617 in control arms in some trials, as well as disease and trial heterogeneity. The data collectively reinforce Lu-177 PSMA-617 as a well-tolerated, effective radioligand option for advanced mCRPC, warranting continued integration into earlier disease settings and combination strategy. Pooled Overall Survival comparing Lu-177 PSMA-617 and standard of care. Study HR OS for Lu-177 PSMA-617 vs standard PSMAFore 0.98 (0.75-1.28) SPLASH 1.11(0.73-1.69) VISION 0.62 (0.52-0.74) TheraP 0.97 (0.70-1.35) Enza-P 0.55 (0.36-0.84) CCT Group 1.64 (1.14-2.35) Pooled Results 0.91 (0.66-1.25)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.e17069
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic review and meta-analysis on safety and efficacy of Lu-177 PSMA-617 and standardized treatment in mCRPC from randomized phase II/III trials.

Dawood Hasan Syed, Adeel Kaiser, Anisha Agarwal, Adithya Nagendran et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
article

A systematic review and meta-analysis on safety and efficacy of Lu-177 PSMA-617 and standardized treatment in mCRPC from randomized phase II/III trials.

Dawood Hasan Syed, Adeel Kaiser, Anisha Agarwal, Adithya Nagendran, Azza Abdalla, Arjun Pon Avudaiappan, Gabriel Valagni, Ahmad Sheraz Iqbal, Mohammad Arfat Ganiyani, Rohan Garje, Minesh P. Mehta, Murugesan Manoharan, Manas Pustake
article en

Abstract

e17069 Background: Lu-177 PSMA-617 delivers targeted β-radiation to prostate cancer cells, offering a distinct mechanism beyond androgen-signaling inhibition in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Pivotal trials have shown improved progression-free survival with favorable tolerability. As its clinical use expands, comparative evidence with established systemic therapies remains limited. This meta-analysis evaluates the pooled efficacy and safety outcomes. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to PRISMA guidelines to evaluate Lu-177 PSMA-617 in mCRPC. Of 456 studies screened, seven met eligibility criteria and were included in the final analysis. Data on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were extracted and pooled using a random-effects model (REML method). Hazard ratios (HRs) and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic, and publication bias was evaluated using both Egger’s regression and Begg’s rank correlation. Results: A total of 2,526 patients from seven randomized trials were analyzed, including 1,365 in the Lu-177 PSMA-617 arms and 1,161 in the standard-of-care arms. Lu-177 PSMA-617 significantly improved PFS compared with control (pooled HR = 0.64; 95% CI 0.50–0.81; p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in OS (HR = 0.91; 95% CI 0.66–1.25; p = 0.55). The pooled RR for grade ≥ 3 AEs was 0.98 (95% CI 0.83–1.14; p = 0.75). Conclusions: Across contemporary randomized trials, Lu-177 PSMA-617 consistently prolongs PFS with no significant difference in AEs. OS benefit remains unconfirmed, likely reflecting post-progression and salvage use of Lu-177 PSMA-617 in control arms in some trials, as well as disease and trial heterogeneity. The data collectively reinforce Lu-177 PSMA-617 as a well-tolerated, effective radioligand option for advanced mCRPC, warranting continued integration into earlier disease settings and combination strategy. Pooled Overall Survival comparing Lu-177 PSMA-617 and standard of care. Study HR OS for Lu-177 PSMA-617 vs standard PSMAFore 0.98 (0.75-1.28) SPLASH 1.11(0.73-1.69) VISION 0.62 (0.52-0.74) TheraP 0.97 (0.70-1.35) Enza-P 0.55 (0.36-0.84) CCT Group 1.64 (1.14-2.35) Pooled Results 0.91 (0.66-1.25)

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Baptist Hospital of Miami (US), Grant Medical College and Sir Jamshedjee Jeejeebhoy Group of Hospitals (IN), Allama Iqbal Medical College (PK), Baptist Health South Florida (US), Unity Health System (US), Miami Heart Research Institute (US), Saint Joseph Hospital (US), Government Medical College (IN), Unity Hospital (US), Geisinger Health System (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.