Lymph Node Sampling Patterns and Completeness of Staging During Systematic Mediastinal Lymph Node Staging in Patients with Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Post Hoc Analysis from the SEISMIC Study

Introduction: Systematic endoscopic mediastinal lymph node (LN) staging in early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is widely recommended for optimal pre-operative staging due to imperfect accuracy of PET/CT. The SEISMIC study utilized synoptic reporting of findings during systematic endoscopic staging to inform radiotherapy planning in patients with locally advanced NSCLC and established a significant rate of discordance between PET-identified extent of disease and observed findings following EBUS. International guidelines recommend systematic LN staging in patients with clinical nodal stage (cN) 1–3 disease as a quality indicator, though performance metrics for quality assessment of systematic endoscopic mediastinal staging in NSCLC have not been described. Methods: A post hoc analysis of 155 participants with locally advanced NSCLC recruited to the SEISMIC study who underwent systematic endoscopic mediastinal staging, with sampling of all LN ≥ 6 mm, prior to planning of radical or high-dose palliative radiation, was completed. Synoptic procedural reports and pre-procedure PET imaging were examined to determine the number of LN sampled, as well as the number of radiologically normal LN (<10 mm diameter, no PET-avidity) sampled, and to establish the completeness of mediastinal staging. Results: Sampling was performed from a median two LN per patient. Sampling from at least one radiologically normal LN was performed in 92/155 (59%) participants, with ≥2 radiologically normal LN sampled in 47 participants (30%). PET-occult LN disease was identified in 18 of 92 (20%) of patients who underwent sampling of radiologically normal LN. The number of LN sampled in individual patients was largely influenced by the number of observed LN ≥ 6 mm in the short-axis dimension. Among these 76 participants staged cN2a by PET, EBUS identified PET-occult metastases in seven (9%), with four (5%) upstaged to cN2b and three (4%) to cN3. In only three patients (2% of cohort) were LN > 6 mm at higher station than the highest LN identified by PET not sampled endoscopically, confirming a high rate of complete mediastinal assessment. Conclusions: Quality of systematic staging in the SEISMIC study was high. Synoptic reporting supports high quality systematic endoscopic mediastinal LN staging in NSCLC and enables performance monitoring of systematic EBUS staging. Novel quality metrics are proposed for quality assessment, and consistent use of these may encourage more extensive LN sampling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18111766
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lymph Node Sampling Patterns and Completeness of Staging During Systematic Mediastinal Lymph Node Staging in Patients with Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Post Hoc Analysis from the SEISMIC Study

Neil Wallace, Gargi Kothari, Nicholas Hardcastle, David Fielding et al.
Cancers
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Lymph Node Sampling Patterns and Completeness of Staging During Systematic Mediastinal Lymph Node Staging in Patients with Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Post Hoc Analysis from the SEISMIC Study

Neil Wallace, Gargi Kothari, Nicholas Hardcastle, David Fielding, Daniel Steinfort, Joseph M. Curran, Jouke T. Annema, Ashleigh Witt, Shaun Yo, Farzad Bashirdazeh, Barton R. Jennings, David Ost, Kanishka Rangamuwa, Kazuhiro Yasufuku, Laurence Crombag, Shankar Siva, Phan Nguyen
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Systematic endoscopic mediastinal lymph node (LN) staging in early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is widely recommended for optimal pre-operative staging due to imperfect accuracy of PET/CT. The SEISMIC study utilized synoptic reporting of findings during systematic endoscopic staging to inform radiotherapy planning in patients with locally advanced NSCLC and established a significant rate of discordance between PET-identified extent of disease and observed findings following EBUS. International guidelines recommend systematic LN staging in patients with clinical nodal stage (cN) 1–3 disease as a quality indicator, though performance metrics for quality assessment of systematic endoscopic mediastinal staging in NSCLC have not been described. Methods: A post hoc analysis of 155 participants with locally advanced NSCLC recruited to the SEISMIC study who underwent systematic endoscopic mediastinal staging, with sampling of all LN ≥ 6 mm, prior to planning of radical or high-dose palliative radiation, was completed. Synoptic procedural reports and pre-procedure PET imaging were examined to determine the number of LN sampled, as well as the number of radiologically normal LN (<10 mm diameter, no PET-avidity) sampled, and to establish the completeness of mediastinal staging. Results: Sampling was performed from a median two LN per patient. Sampling from at least one radiologically normal LN was performed in 92/155 (59%) participants, with ≥2 radiologically normal LN sampled in 47 participants (30%). PET-occult LN disease was identified in 18 of 92 (20%) of patients who underwent sampling of radiologically normal LN. The number of LN sampled in individual patients was largely influenced by the number of observed LN ≥ 6 mm in the short-axis dimension. Among these 76 participants staged cN2a by PET, EBUS identified PET-occult metastases in seven (9%), with four (5%) upstaged to cN2b and three (4%) to cN3. In only three patients (2% of cohort) were LN > 6 mm at higher station than the highest LN identified by PET not sampled endoscopically, confirming a high rate of complete mediastinal assessment. Conclusions: Quality of systematic staging in the SEISMIC study was high. Synoptic reporting supports high quality systematic endoscopic mediastinal LN staging in NSCLC and enables performance monitoring of systematic EBUS staging. Novel quality metrics are proposed for quality assessment, and consistent use of these may encourage more extensive LN sampling.

CancersVol. 18(11)
Royal Adelaide Hospital (AU), The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), The University of Melbourne (AU), University of Wollongong (AU), Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (AU), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU), Toronto General Hospital (CA), Monash Health (AU), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.