Comparative outcomes of squamous and non-squamous penile cancers: Insights from SEER database.

e17031 Background: Penile cancer is a rare neoplasm in Western countries and is typically of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) origin. Nonsquamous cell carcinomas (NSCC) constitute approximately 5% of penile malignancies, however, their clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic implications remain poorly defined. Penile cancers are positively associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and inversely associated with circumcision. Limited studies are done to see demographic patterns and population based survival outcomes in penile cancer. Our study aims to evaluate the trends, clinicopathologic differences, and survival outcomes between squamous and non-squamous penile cancers using the SEER database. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed using SEER 17 registries (2000–2022). Adult patients (≥18 years) with histologically confirmed penile cancer (ICD-10 C60) were included. Variables analyzed included age, race, tumor site, stage, and treatment modality (surgery, chemotherapy, radiation). Survival was assessed using Kaplan–Meier estimates and log-rank testing using Graphpad Prism. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: Among 7,719 patients (median age 68 years), 7,216 (93.5%) had SCC and 503 (6.5%) had NSCC. The cohort was predominantly White (62.9%), followed by Hispanic (21.8%), Black (8.7%), Asian/Pacific Islander (4.9%), and American Indian/Alaska Native (0.9%) patients. Median overall survival (OS) varied significantly by race (P < 0.0001), highest among Asian/Pacific Islanders (108 M) and lowest among Black patients (56 M). In terms of primary site, prepuce had the longest median OS (86 M), followed by glans (70M) and shaft (68M).Median OS was 73 M for SCC versus 43 M for NSCC (P < 0.0001). Median OS was 101 M for in situ/localized, 43 M for regional, and 8 M for distant disease (P value-0.0001). Surgery was associated with improved OS in both SCC (78M) and NSCC (89M), while chemotherapy or radiation demonstrated shorter survival, likely reflecting more advanced disease at presentation. Conclusions: Histologic subtype significantly impacts survival in penile cancer, with NSCC showing poorer outcomes than SCC. Surgical management remains the cornerstone of therapy and improves survival irrespective of histology. Chemotherapy and radiation were associated with worse outcomes, highlighting the need for early detection, individualized surgical strategies, and prospective studies for non-squamous variants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.e17031
Primary Topic
Genital Health and Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative outcomes of squamous and non-squamous penile cancers: Insights from SEER database.

Saqib Rangoonwala, Vidushi Reddy Gillela, Sonia Babu, R Thirumaran et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Genital Health and Disease
article

Comparative outcomes of squamous and non-squamous penile cancers: Insights from SEER database.

Saqib Rangoonwala, Vidushi Reddy Gillela, Sonia Babu, R Thirumaran, B Rani, Abul Hassan Shadali Abdul Khader
article en

Abstract

e17031 Background: Penile cancer is a rare neoplasm in Western countries and is typically of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) origin. Nonsquamous cell carcinomas (NSCC) constitute approximately 5% of penile malignancies, however, their clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic implications remain poorly defined. Penile cancers are positively associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and inversely associated with circumcision. Limited studies are done to see demographic patterns and population based survival outcomes in penile cancer. Our study aims to evaluate the trends, clinicopathologic differences, and survival outcomes between squamous and non-squamous penile cancers using the SEER database. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed using SEER 17 registries (2000–2022). Adult patients (≥18 years) with histologically confirmed penile cancer (ICD-10 C60) were included. Variables analyzed included age, race, tumor site, stage, and treatment modality (surgery, chemotherapy, radiation). Survival was assessed using Kaplan–Meier estimates and log-rank testing using Graphpad Prism. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: Among 7,719 patients (median age 68 years), 7,216 (93.5%) had SCC and 503 (6.5%) had NSCC. The cohort was predominantly White (62.9%), followed by Hispanic (21.8%), Black (8.7%), Asian/Pacific Islander (4.9%), and American Indian/Alaska Native (0.9%) patients. Median overall survival (OS) varied significantly by race (P < 0.0001), highest among Asian/Pacific Islanders (108 M) and lowest among Black patients (56 M). In terms of primary site, prepuce had the longest median OS (86 M), followed by glans (70M) and shaft (68M).Median OS was 73 M for SCC versus 43 M for NSCC (P < 0.0001). Median OS was 101 M for in situ/localized, 43 M for regional, and 8 M for distant disease (P value-0.0001). Surgery was associated with improved OS in both SCC (78M) and NSCC (89M), while chemotherapy or radiation demonstrated shorter survival, likely reflecting more advanced disease at presentation. Conclusions: Histologic subtype significantly impacts survival in penile cancer, with NSCC showing poorer outcomes than SCC. Surgical management remains the cornerstone of therapy and improves survival irrespective of histology. Chemotherapy and radiation were associated with worse outcomes, highlighting the need for early detection, individualized surgical strategies, and prospective studies for non-squamous variants.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Catholic Medical Center (US), Mercy Catholic Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Genital Health and Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.