Structures and Processes: A Falsifiable Framework for Ontological Analysis

We present a falsifiable ontological framework: structures emerge from processes. A structure is any observable entity, system, or pattern; a process is any mechanism, activity, or interaction. The framework claims structures are not independent entities maintained by external forces—they are emergent patterns of organized process activity. This relationship is universal: every investigated structure reveals underlying processes; process cessation causes structural dissolution or transformation. The framework is falsifiable: find one structure existing without processes → refuted. Pattern tested across physics, biology, cosmology, psychology, and sociology. We demonstrate a two-layer architecture: Layer 1 (ontological) identifies universal pattern across observable structures; Layer 2 (epistemological) classifies our epistemic access to processes. A taxonomy classifies processes as mappable/non-mappable and visible/invisible, constrained by knowledge and tools. As capabilities advance, non-mappable processes become mappable—enabling self-correction without invalidating core principles. The framework emerges from pattern recognition: if processes cease, structures transform or vanish. This pattern holds universally across centuries of scientific investigation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20408214
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structures and Processes: A Falsifiable Framework for Ontological Analysis

Faruk Pedro Salvador
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Philosophy and History of Science
article

Structures and Processes: A Falsifiable Framework for Ontological Analysis

Faruk Pedro Salvador
article en

Abstract

We present a falsifiable ontological framework: structures emerge from processes. A structure is any observable entity, system, or pattern; a process is any mechanism, activity, or interaction. The framework claims structures are not independent entities maintained by external forces—they are emergent patterns of organized process activity. This relationship is universal: every investigated structure reveals underlying processes; process cessation causes structural dissolution or transformation. The framework is falsifiable: find one structure existing without processes → refuted. Pattern tested across physics, biology, cosmology, psychology, and sociology. We demonstrate a two-layer architecture: Layer 1 (ontological) identifies universal pattern across observable structures; Layer 2 (epistemological) classifies our epistemic access to processes. A taxonomy classifies processes as mappable/non-mappable and visible/invisible, constrained by knowledge and tools. As capabilities advance, non-mappable processes become mappable—enabling self-correction without invalidating core principles. The framework emerges from pattern recognition: if processes cease, structures transform or vanish. This pattern holds universally across centuries of scientific investigation.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Philosophy and History of Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.