The TIME trial: Phase II randomized controlled trial of time-of-day–specified nivolumab and ipilimumab for advanced melanoma.

TPS2677 Background: Nivolumab/ipilimumab is standard of care for advanced melanoma patients based on Phase III randomized data from the CheckMate 067 trial. The recent 10-year outcomes results were reported with a melanoma specific survival for Nivolumab/ipilimumab of 52%. These data are very encouraging, but 50% of patients still succumb to their disease by 10-years. Preclinical data suggests that the circadian rhythm may influence the anatomic localization, function and activity of T cells, the target of immunotherapy. More T cells in the tumor or tumor-draining lymph node during initial immunotherapy administration may improve clinical responses and long-term outcomes. To investigate this idea, we performed a retrospective analysis, the MEMOIR study, finding that more evening infusions of immunotherapy were associated with significantly worse progression free and overall survival for metastatic melanoma patients. These findings have now been reproduced in other cancer histologies, in a larger meta-analysis, and in pre-clinical mechanistic studies. Considering these data, we hypothesize that evening infusions of immunotherapy will have worse progression free survival than either morning or midday infusions. Methods: The TIME trial is a three-arm phase II study of time-of-day specified administration of standard dose nivolumab/ipilimumab for metastatic melanoma. For newly diagnosed metastatic melanoma patients enrolled on study, they will be randomized to receive 4 cycles every 3 weeks of nivolumab/ipilimumab between 8:00-11:00 (Arm A), 11:00-14:00 (Arm B), or 14:00-17:00 (Arm C). Following these 4 cycles, they will receive standard of care maintenance nivolumab in a time-of-day agnostic fashion. Eligible patients must have stage IV unresectable cutaneous, acral or mucosal melanoma, no prior immunotherapy within 1 year, ECOG performance status of 0-1, age ≥ 18, no symptomatic or hemorrhagic brain metastases with none greater than 2 cm. The primary objective is to determine whether progression free survival for Arm A or Arm B is superior to Arm C. Secondary objectives include assessments of adverse events, melanoma specific survival and overall survival. We will evaluate the immune profiles of blood and tumor to assess the impact of time of drug administration on the circulating immune responses and the tumor immune microenvironment. 99 patients will be enrolled to detect a HR of 0.50 with at least 80% power and a Type 1 error rate of 0.1 (2-sided) for a comparison of A vs. C, and B vs. C. The study is open at Emory and has enrolled 3 patients; the study is undergoing regulatory review at MGH and Cedars-Sinai. Clinical trial information: NCT07155317 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.tps2677
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The TIME trial: Phase II randomized controlled trial of time-of-day–specified nivolumab and ipilimumab for advanced melanoma.

Nathaniel R. Wilson, Melinda Lynne Yushak, Zachary Buchwald, Michael Lowe et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

The TIME trial: Phase II randomized controlled trial of time-of-day–specified nivolumab and ipilimumab for advanced melanoma.

Nathaniel R. Wilson, Melinda Lynne Yushak, Zachary Buchwald, Michael Lowe, David Qian, Omid Hamid, David H. Lawson, Jeffrey Switchenko, Ryan J. Sullivan
article en

Abstract

TPS2677 Background: Nivolumab/ipilimumab is standard of care for advanced melanoma patients based on Phase III randomized data from the CheckMate 067 trial. The recent 10-year outcomes results were reported with a melanoma specific survival for Nivolumab/ipilimumab of 52%. These data are very encouraging, but 50% of patients still succumb to their disease by 10-years. Preclinical data suggests that the circadian rhythm may influence the anatomic localization, function and activity of T cells, the target of immunotherapy. More T cells in the tumor or tumor-draining lymph node during initial immunotherapy administration may improve clinical responses and long-term outcomes. To investigate this idea, we performed a retrospective analysis, the MEMOIR study, finding that more evening infusions of immunotherapy were associated with significantly worse progression free and overall survival for metastatic melanoma patients. These findings have now been reproduced in other cancer histologies, in a larger meta-analysis, and in pre-clinical mechanistic studies. Considering these data, we hypothesize that evening infusions of immunotherapy will have worse progression free survival than either morning or midday infusions. Methods: The TIME trial is a three-arm phase II study of time-of-day specified administration of standard dose nivolumab/ipilimumab for metastatic melanoma. For newly diagnosed metastatic melanoma patients enrolled on study, they will be randomized to receive 4 cycles every 3 weeks of nivolumab/ipilimumab between 8:00-11:00 (Arm A), 11:00-14:00 (Arm B), or 14:00-17:00 (Arm C). Following these 4 cycles, they will receive standard of care maintenance nivolumab in a time-of-day agnostic fashion. Eligible patients must have stage IV unresectable cutaneous, acral or mucosal melanoma, no prior immunotherapy within 1 year, ECOG performance status of 0-1, age ≥ 18, no symptomatic or hemorrhagic brain metastases with none greater than 2 cm. The primary objective is to determine whether progression free survival for Arm A or Arm B is superior to Arm C. Secondary objectives include assessments of adverse events, melanoma specific survival and overall survival. We will evaluate the immune profiles of blood and tumor to assess the impact of time of drug administration on the circulating immune responses and the tumor immune microenvironment. 99 patients will be enrolled to detect a HR of 0.50 with at least 80% power and a Type 1 error rate of 0.1 (2-sided) for a comparison of A vs. C, and B vs. C. The study is open at Emory and has enrolled 3 patients; the study is undergoing regulatory review at MGH and Cedars-Sinai. Clinical trial information: NCT07155317 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Harvard University (US), Emory University (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Piedmont Cancer Institute (US), Angeles Clinic and Research Institute (US), Winship Cancer Institute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.