Retrospective study on safety and efficacy of hypofractionated versus conventional fractionated sequential radiotherapy for stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer.

e20058 Background: Large-scale clinical data directly comparing hypofractionated radiotherapy (HypoRT) with conventional fractionated radiotherapy (ConvRT) in the sequential setting for stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate whether a 4-week HypoRT regimen is as effective and safe as a 6-week ConvRT regimen. Methods: Large-scale clinical data directly comparing hypofractionated radiotherapy (HypoRT) with conventional fractionated radiotherapy (ConvRT) in the sequential setting for stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate whether a 4-week HypoRT regimen is as effective and safe as a 6-week ConvRT regimen. Results: From October 2018 to December 2024, 280 patients were included and allocated in a 2:1 ratio to the HypoRT group (n = 178) or the ConvRT group (n = 102). Baseline characteristics were balanced. With a median follow-up of 47.2 months, HypoRT did not meet the pre-specified non-inferiority margin for OS compared to ConvRT. Median OS was 51.4 months in the HypoRT group and 44.6 months in the ConvRT group (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78–1.36). The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 90.3%, 72.8%, 58.4%, and 46.5% for HypoRT, and 89.1%, 71.2%, 57.4%, and 45.8% for ConvRT, respectively. Median PFS was similar between groups (19.5 vs. 16.2 months; HR = 1.11; 95% CI, 0.82–1.35; p = 0.68). Regarding safety, the HypoRT group had a significantly higher incidence of grade ≥2 radiation esophagitis (67.6% vs. 22.5%; p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of grade ≥2 radiation pneumonitis (16.5% vs. 18.7%; p > 0.05), grade ≥3 acute hematological toxicity (59.8% vs. 66.5%; p > 0.05), or long-term toxicity profiles. Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis, the 4-week HypoRT regimen (60 Gy/20 F) did not demonstrate statistical non-inferiority in OS compared to the 6.5-week ConvRT regimen (66 Gy/33 F) for stage III unresectable NSCLC treated with sequential chemoradiotherapy. While survival outcomes were numerically similar, HypoRT was associated with a significantly increased risk of grade ≥2 esophagitis. These findings highlight the need for careful patient selection and toxicity management when considering hypofractionated schedules in this setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.e20058
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Retrospective study on safety and efficacy of hypofractionated versus conventional fractionated sequential radiotherapy for stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer.

Shupei Pan, Ruijuan Zhang, Shangyi Geng, Xixi Zhao et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Retrospective study on safety and efficacy of hypofractionated versus conventional fractionated sequential radiotherapy for stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer.

Shupei Pan, Ruijuan Zhang, Shangyi Geng, Xixi Zhao, Hongbing Ma
article en

Abstract

e20058 Background: Large-scale clinical data directly comparing hypofractionated radiotherapy (HypoRT) with conventional fractionated radiotherapy (ConvRT) in the sequential setting for stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate whether a 4-week HypoRT regimen is as effective and safe as a 6-week ConvRT regimen. Methods: Large-scale clinical data directly comparing hypofractionated radiotherapy (HypoRT) with conventional fractionated radiotherapy (ConvRT) in the sequential setting for stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate whether a 4-week HypoRT regimen is as effective and safe as a 6-week ConvRT regimen. Results: From October 2018 to December 2024, 280 patients were included and allocated in a 2:1 ratio to the HypoRT group (n = 178) or the ConvRT group (n = 102). Baseline characteristics were balanced. With a median follow-up of 47.2 months, HypoRT did not meet the pre-specified non-inferiority margin for OS compared to ConvRT. Median OS was 51.4 months in the HypoRT group and 44.6 months in the ConvRT group (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78–1.36). The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 90.3%, 72.8%, 58.4%, and 46.5% for HypoRT, and 89.1%, 71.2%, 57.4%, and 45.8% for ConvRT, respectively. Median PFS was similar between groups (19.5 vs. 16.2 months; HR = 1.11; 95% CI, 0.82–1.35; p = 0.68). Regarding safety, the HypoRT group had a significantly higher incidence of grade ≥2 radiation esophagitis (67.6% vs. 22.5%; p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of grade ≥2 radiation pneumonitis (16.5% vs. 18.7%; p > 0.05), grade ≥3 acute hematological toxicity (59.8% vs. 66.5%; p > 0.05), or long-term toxicity profiles. Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis, the 4-week HypoRT regimen (60 Gy/20 F) did not demonstrate statistical non-inferiority in OS compared to the 6.5-week ConvRT regimen (66 Gy/33 F) for stage III unresectable NSCLC treated with sequential chemoradiotherapy. While survival outcomes were numerically similar, HypoRT was associated with a significantly increased risk of grade ≥2 esophagitis. These findings highlight the need for careful patient selection and toxicity management when considering hypofractionated schedules in this setting.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.