Disparities in supportive care access and financial burden associated with chemotherapy-induced alopecia in women with breast cancer.

e13748 Background: Chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA) remains one of the most visible and psychologically distressing toxicities of breast cancer therapy. Despite its high prevalence and impact on treatment experience, CIA management is inconsistently integrated into oncology supportive care pathways, and access to mitigation strategies may vary across demographic and treatment-related factors. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was administered between July and October 2025 to women with breast cancer who received chemotherapy or endocrine therapy at two academic centers in the United States. Data collected included demographic characteristics, chemotherapy regimen, hair loss severity and management strategies, out-of-pocket costs, treatment avoidance, and perceived healthcare support. Outcomes were analyzed by Fitzpatrick skin phototype, chemotherapy regimen, hair texture, and household income. Results: Among 63 respondents (mean age 57.1 years), 43% received-taxane based chemotherapy. Nearly all participants reported chemotherapy-associated hair loss; however, only 11.1% had dermatologic involvement in management. Patients with Fitzpatrick skin types IV-VI were significantly more likely to delay or forgo CIA treatment due to cost compared with those with types I-III (68.4% vs. 34.2%; RR = 2.00; p = 0.023). Patients receiving taxane-based chemotherapy reported greater financial burden related to CIA management compared with non-taxane regimens (64.0% vs 45.5%; RR = 1.41) and were less likely to feel adequately supported by the healthcare team (7.4% vs 27.8%; p = 0.055). Cost-related treatment avoidance was highest among middle-income patients ($25,000-$74,999; 56.0%) compared with both lower- and higher-income groups, consistent with a supportive-care coverage gap. Hair texture was not significantly associated with treatment-seeking behavior or access. Conclusions: CIA represents a clinically meaningful toxicity with disproportionate financial and supportive-care burden among patients receiving taxane-based therapy and those with darker skin phototypes. These findings suggest that disparities in CIA management are driven by structural gaps in oncology supportive care. Improved integration of alopecia prevention counseling, referral pathways, and equitable access strategies is warranted within comprehensive breast cancer care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.e13748
Primary Topic
Hair Growth and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disparities in supportive care access and financial burden associated with chemotherapy-induced alopecia in women with breast cancer.

J Lee, Samantha El Warrak, Simonetta I. Gaumond, Traci King et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Hair Growth and Disorders
article

Disparities in supportive care access and financial burden associated with chemotherapy-induced alopecia in women with breast cancer.

J Lee, Samantha El Warrak, Simonetta I. Gaumond, Traci King, Bernice Y. Kwong, Aaron Harris, Carlos Lange Nava, Antonella Tosti, Lillian A. Hubbard, Robert S. Kirsner
article en

Abstract

e13748 Background: Chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA) remains one of the most visible and psychologically distressing toxicities of breast cancer therapy. Despite its high prevalence and impact on treatment experience, CIA management is inconsistently integrated into oncology supportive care pathways, and access to mitigation strategies may vary across demographic and treatment-related factors. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was administered between July and October 2025 to women with breast cancer who received chemotherapy or endocrine therapy at two academic centers in the United States. Data collected included demographic characteristics, chemotherapy regimen, hair loss severity and management strategies, out-of-pocket costs, treatment avoidance, and perceived healthcare support. Outcomes were analyzed by Fitzpatrick skin phototype, chemotherapy regimen, hair texture, and household income. Results: Among 63 respondents (mean age 57.1 years), 43% received-taxane based chemotherapy. Nearly all participants reported chemotherapy-associated hair loss; however, only 11.1% had dermatologic involvement in management. Patients with Fitzpatrick skin types IV-VI were significantly more likely to delay or forgo CIA treatment due to cost compared with those with types I-III (68.4% vs. 34.2%; RR = 2.00; p = 0.023). Patients receiving taxane-based chemotherapy reported greater financial burden related to CIA management compared with non-taxane regimens (64.0% vs 45.5%; RR = 1.41) and were less likely to feel adequately supported by the healthcare team (7.4% vs 27.8%; p = 0.055). Cost-related treatment avoidance was highest among middle-income patients ($25,000-$74,999; 56.0%) compared with both lower- and higher-income groups, consistent with a supportive-care coverage gap. Hair texture was not significantly associated with treatment-seeking behavior or access. Conclusions: CIA represents a clinically meaningful toxicity with disproportionate financial and supportive-care burden among patients receiving taxane-based therapy and those with darker skin phototypes. These findings suggest that disparities in CIA management are driven by structural gaps in oncology supportive care. Improved integration of alopecia prevention counseling, referral pathways, and equitable access strategies is warranted within comprehensive breast cancer care.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
University of Miami (US), Stanford University (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Hair Growth and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.