Personnel Psychology's 40‐Questions Series: The Science and Practice of Groups and Teams

ABSTRACT Teams are core to modern organizations. Yet, the science of teams has grown increasingly specialized, making it difficult for scholars and practitioners to integrate core insights across levels of analysis and emerging contexts. In this article, we provide concise, evidence‐based responses to 40 pressing questions about the scope, design, functioning, leadership, and evolution of teams. We address foundational issues of team definition and enabling conditions; composition, diversity, and reward structures; team cognition, conflict, affect, and learning; leadership and coaching; top management teams and board dynamics; multiteam systems; and the implications of hybrid work and artificial intelligence (AI). Across these domains, several integrative themes emerge: team effectiveness is fundamentally shaped by design; individual capabilities must be activated and integrated to generate collective performance; coordination challenges change qualitatively as systems scale; and technological tools amplify, rather than replace, core teamwork mechanisms. By synthesizing current knowledge, clarifying boundary conditions, and identifying unresolved tensions, we aim to inform practical organizational decisions while advancing a more cumulative, multilevel science of groups and teams.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personnel Psychology
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.70033
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Personnel Psychology's 40‐Questions Series: The Science and Practice of Groups and Teams

Anita Williams Woolley, Bradford S. Bell, Kyle J. Emich, Randall S. Peterson et al.
Personnel Psychology
Team Dynamics and Performance
article

Personnel Psychology's 40‐Questions Series: The Science and Practice of Groups and Teams

Anita Williams Woolley, Bradford S. Bell, Kyle J. Emich, Randall S. Peterson, John E. Mathieu, Scott I. Tannenbaum, John R. Hollenbeck, Laurie R. Weingart
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Teams are core to modern organizations. Yet, the science of teams has grown increasingly specialized, making it difficult for scholars and practitioners to integrate core insights across levels of analysis and emerging contexts. In this article, we provide concise, evidence‐based responses to 40 pressing questions about the scope, design, functioning, leadership, and evolution of teams. We address foundational issues of team definition and enabling conditions; composition, diversity, and reward structures; team cognition, conflict, affect, and learning; leadership and coaching; top management teams and board dynamics; multiteam systems; and the implications of hybrid work and artificial intelligence (AI). Across these domains, several integrative themes emerge: team effectiveness is fundamentally shaped by design; individual capabilities must be activated and integrated to generate collective performance; coordination challenges change qualitatively as systems scale; and technological tools amplify, rather than replace, core teamwork mechanisms. By synthesizing current knowledge, clarifying boundary conditions, and identifying unresolved tensions, we aim to inform practical organizational decisions while advancing a more cumulative, multilevel science of groups and teams.

Personnel Psychology
University of Connecticut (US), Cornell University (US), Group for Organizational Effectiveness (US), London Business School (GB), Carnegie Mellon University (US), University of Delaware (US), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Team Dynamics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.