How reliable are national digital soil maps for farm-scale baseline assessment? A multi-scale assessment using dairy farm data

ABSTRACT Digital soil mapping (DSM) provides a scalable approach for monitoring soil health indicators to support sustainable land management and precision agriculture. However, uncertainties associated with input data and fine-scale management factors including land-use type, fertiliser history, and grazing intensity can limit predictive reliability at operational scales. Evaluating the performance of DSM products under real farm conditions is therefore critical to determine their suitability for baseline assessment. This study assessed the accuracy of the Soil and Landscape Grid of Australia (SLGA), a national-scale DSM product, in predicting topsoil (0–30 cm) soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP) using more than 800 independently collected topsoil samples from nine Australian dairy farms. The SLGA prediction performance was evaluated at sub-farm (individual Carbon Estimation Areas, CEAs, i.e., paddocks or groups of paddocks with similar land use and management within a farm) and farm scales (aggregated across all CEAs within a farm) using R², Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean bias error (MBE). In addition, linear mixed-effects models tested SLGA's ability to detect differences due to land use and farming systems (pasture-based vs. confinement). The SLGA showed moderate accuracy for SOC and TN at the farm scale (SOC: R² = 0.79, CCC = 0.88; TN: R² = 0.87, CCC = 0.79), but substantially weaker agreement at the sub-farm scale, and very poor accuracy for TP across both scales (R² ≤ 0.01; CCC ≤ 0.02). Standardized errors were moderate for SOC and TN, and highest for TP. The SLGA successfully detected differences in SOC and TN between pasture-based and confinement systems, demonstrating value for broad farm-scale baseline assessments, but showed limited sensitivity to within-farm land-use variation. Overall, SLGA provides useful farm-scale baseline assessments of SOC and TN in dairy systems; however, improvements are required to enhance sub-farm precision, TP prediction, and the representation of local management effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2026.105009
Primary Topic
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How reliable are national digital soil maps for farm-scale baseline assessment? A multi-scale assessment using dairy farm data

Ho Jun Jang, Mulisa Dida, Sergio Hernández García, Luciano A. González
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
article

How reliable are national digital soil maps for farm-scale baseline assessment? A multi-scale assessment using dairy farm data

Ho Jun Jang, Mulisa Dida, Sergio Hernández García, Luciano A. González
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Digital soil mapping (DSM) provides a scalable approach for monitoring soil health indicators to support sustainable land management and precision agriculture. However, uncertainties associated with input data and fine-scale management factors including land-use type, fertiliser history, and grazing intensity can limit predictive reliability at operational scales. Evaluating the performance of DSM products under real farm conditions is therefore critical to determine their suitability for baseline assessment. This study assessed the accuracy of the Soil and Landscape Grid of Australia (SLGA), a national-scale DSM product, in predicting topsoil (0–30 cm) soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP) using more than 800 independently collected topsoil samples from nine Australian dairy farms. The SLGA prediction performance was evaluated at sub-farm (individual Carbon Estimation Areas, CEAs, i.e., paddocks or groups of paddocks with similar land use and management within a farm) and farm scales (aggregated across all CEAs within a farm) using R², Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean bias error (MBE). In addition, linear mixed-effects models tested SLGA's ability to detect differences due to land use and farming systems (pasture-based vs. confinement). The SLGA showed moderate accuracy for SOC and TN at the farm scale (SOC: R² = 0.79, CCC = 0.88; TN: R² = 0.87, CCC = 0.79), but substantially weaker agreement at the sub-farm scale, and very poor accuracy for TP across both scales (R² ≤ 0.01; CCC ≤ 0.02). Standardized errors were moderate for SOC and TN, and highest for TP. The SLGA successfully detected differences in SOC and TN between pasture-based and confinement systems, demonstrating value for broad farm-scale baseline assessments, but showed limited sensitivity to within-farm land-use variation. Overall, SLGA provides useful farm-scale baseline assessments of SOC and TN in dairy systems; however, improvements are required to enhance sub-farm precision, TP prediction, and the representation of local management effects.

Environmental Technology & InnovationVol. 43
The University of Sydney (AU)
University of Sydney
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.