Nature-Based Solutions and Human Health in Europe—A Systematic Review

Nature-based solutions (NbS) are increasingly promoted in European policy for their potential to support climate adaptation and contribute to human health. Yet evidence on their health impacts remains fragmented across disciplines and limited to specific health outcomes or ecosystems. We carried out a systematic review of studies assessing the links between NbS and human health in Europe, covering multiple ecosystem types (agricultural, coastal, forest, mountain, urban, rural and freshwater ecosystems) and both mental and physical health outcomes. A total of 115 studies met the inclusion criteria and were concentrated in the United Kingdom (38%) and Spain (17%), with urban (45%) and forest (17%) ecosystems most frequently examined. Most studies evaluated Type 1 NbS (minimal intervention) and focused on adult populations (58%). Mental health outcomes were studied nearly twice as often as physical health, including positive mental health, circulatory diseases and mental and behavioural disorders. Nearly 88% of quantitative studies reported at least one positive association, whereas qualitative studies highlighted that perceived health benefits of NbS were often shaped by participants’ subjective experiences. Our findings emphasise the need for more longitudinal and experimental research designs, attention to NbS types and equity considerations, and better integration of human health into NbS planning and policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environments
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/environments13060300
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nature-Based Solutions and Human Health in Europe—A Systematic Review

Andrea Staccione, Andreas Tuerk, Doan Nainggolan, Maximilian Nawrath et al.
Environments
Urban Green Space and Health
article

Nature-Based Solutions and Human Health in Europe—A Systematic Review

Andrea Staccione, Andreas Tuerk, Doan Nainggolan, Maximilian Nawrath, Marianne Zandersen, Wenting Chen, Diya Chakravorty, Chiara Bidoli, Hélène Rizzotti
article en

Abstract

Nature-based solutions (NbS) are increasingly promoted in European policy for their potential to support climate adaptation and contribute to human health. Yet evidence on their health impacts remains fragmented across disciplines and limited to specific health outcomes or ecosystems. We carried out a systematic review of studies assessing the links between NbS and human health in Europe, covering multiple ecosystem types (agricultural, coastal, forest, mountain, urban, rural and freshwater ecosystems) and both mental and physical health outcomes. A total of 115 studies met the inclusion criteria and were concentrated in the United Kingdom (38%) and Spain (17%), with urban (45%) and forest (17%) ecosystems most frequently examined. Most studies evaluated Type 1 NbS (minimal intervention) and focused on adult populations (58%). Mental health outcomes were studied nearly twice as often as physical health, including positive mental health, circulatory diseases and mental and behavioural disorders. Nearly 88% of quantitative studies reported at least one positive association, whereas qualitative studies highlighted that perceived health benefits of NbS were often shaped by participants’ subjective experiences. Our findings emphasise the need for more longitudinal and experimental research designs, attention to NbS types and equity considerations, and better integration of human health into NbS planning and policy.

EnvironmentsVol. 13(6)
Joanneum Research (AT), European Central Bank (DE), Aarhus University (DK), Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NO), CMCC Foundation - Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change (IT)
European Commission
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Urban Green Space and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.