A phase III randomized trial of pembrolizumab in combination with sacituzumab govitecan vs standard of care in anti–PD-(L)1–resistant advanced urothelial cancer: ECOG-ACRIN EA8231.

TPS4641 Background: Patients (pts) with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) who progress after anti-PD-(L)1 therapy (CPI-R) and enfortumab vedotin (EV) have relatively limited treatment options and poor outcomes. SG, a TROP-2–directed antibody–drug conjugate (ADC), has meaningful efficacy in previously treated la/mUC, while SG plus pembro achieved 41% overall response rate (ORR; 20% complete response rate) in platinum-refractory la/mUC. With rapidly evolving treatment paradigms and earlier use of EV and anti-PD(L)1, the frequency of CPI-R la/mUC is expected to increase; therefore, newer combinations and the role of anti-PD(L)1 re-challenge should be prospectively evaluated in previously treated la/mUC. We hypothesized that SG/pembro combination would improve outcomes over standard chemotherapy (SOC) in pts previously treated with anti-PD(L)1. Methods: EA8231 is an open-label, multicenter, randomized phase III trial enrolling adults with unresectable la/mUC. Key eligibility criteria: a) ECOG PS 0-2 b) Prior anti-PD(L)1 given in any disease setting but no cancer progression within 12 weeks from starting prior anti-PD(L)1initiation c) Prior exposure to EV unless contraindicated d) ≥1 lines of systemic therapy for la/mUC [ FGFR3 altered tumors must have received prior FGFR inhibitor unless contraindicated] e) Bellmunt score 0-2 f) No prior exposure to SG or other TROP-2 directed therapies or drugs containing topo-isomerase I inhibitor. Treatment: Pts are randomized 1:1 to Arm A SOC (platinum-gemcitabine or taxane Q3 week cycle) OR Arm B pembro/SG (Pembro 200mg on day 1 + SG 10mg/kg on days 1, 8 of a 21-day cycle with G-CSF support). Pts are stratified by Bellmunt score (0-1 vs 2), prior lines of therapy (≤2 vs >2), prior exposure to platinum-based chemotherapy (yes vs no prior exposure and platinum-eligible vs no prior exposure and platinum-ineligible), duration of prior anti PD-(L)1 therapy (≤6 vs >6 months). G-CSF primary prophylaxis is strongly recommended, esp. with SG. Endpoints : Primary endpoint: overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints: progression-free survival, ORR, clinical benefit rate, duration of response, safety/tolerability, health related QOL (NFBlSI-18; FACIT-Fatigue; EQ-5D-5L). Statistical plan: Trial is designed to demonstrate 42.5% improvement in median OS [platinum-ineligible cohort: median OS increase from 9 to 12.8 months; platinum-eligible cohort: median OS increase from 10.3 to 14.7 months]; 80% power with 1-sided 0.025 type I error rate; HR (pembro+SG/SOC) 0.70, N=320. Trial Status: Activation date: 10/23/2025 (1 patient accrued as of Jan 6, 2026; 28 approved sites, additional sites pending). Clinical trial information: NCT06524544 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.tps4641
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A phase III randomized trial of pembrolizumab in combination with sacituzumab govitecan vs standard of care in anti–PD-(L)1–resistant advanced urothelial cancer: ECOG-ACRIN EA8231.

Noah M. Hahn, Michael A. Carducci, Elizabeth Wulff, Amee Morgans et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
article

A phase III randomized trial of pembrolizumab in combination with sacituzumab govitecan vs standard of care in anti–PD-(L)1–resistant advanced urothelial cancer: ECOG-ACRIN EA8231.

Noah M. Hahn, Michael A. Carducci, Elizabeth Wulff, Amee Morgans, Kriti Mittal, Naomi B. Haas, Se Eun Kim, Lynne I. Wagner, Joshua Warrick, Melissa A. Reimers, Monika Joshi, Petros Grivas
article en

Abstract

TPS4641 Background: Patients (pts) with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) who progress after anti-PD-(L)1 therapy (CPI-R) and enfortumab vedotin (EV) have relatively limited treatment options and poor outcomes. SG, a TROP-2–directed antibody–drug conjugate (ADC), has meaningful efficacy in previously treated la/mUC, while SG plus pembro achieved 41% overall response rate (ORR; 20% complete response rate) in platinum-refractory la/mUC. With rapidly evolving treatment paradigms and earlier use of EV and anti-PD(L)1, the frequency of CPI-R la/mUC is expected to increase; therefore, newer combinations and the role of anti-PD(L)1 re-challenge should be prospectively evaluated in previously treated la/mUC. We hypothesized that SG/pembro combination would improve outcomes over standard chemotherapy (SOC) in pts previously treated with anti-PD(L)1. Methods: EA8231 is an open-label, multicenter, randomized phase III trial enrolling adults with unresectable la/mUC. Key eligibility criteria: a) ECOG PS 0-2 b) Prior anti-PD(L)1 given in any disease setting but no cancer progression within 12 weeks from starting prior anti-PD(L)1initiation c) Prior exposure to EV unless contraindicated d) ≥1 lines of systemic therapy for la/mUC [ FGFR3 altered tumors must have received prior FGFR inhibitor unless contraindicated] e) Bellmunt score 0-2 f) No prior exposure to SG or other TROP-2 directed therapies or drugs containing topo-isomerase I inhibitor. Treatment: Pts are randomized 1:1 to Arm A SOC (platinum-gemcitabine or taxane Q3 week cycle) OR Arm B pembro/SG (Pembro 200mg on day 1 + SG 10mg/kg on days 1, 8 of a 21-day cycle with G-CSF support). Pts are stratified by Bellmunt score (0-1 vs 2), prior lines of therapy (≤2 vs >2), prior exposure to platinum-based chemotherapy (yes vs no prior exposure and platinum-eligible vs no prior exposure and platinum-ineligible), duration of prior anti PD-(L)1 therapy (≤6 vs >6 months). G-CSF primary prophylaxis is strongly recommended, esp. with SG. Endpoints : Primary endpoint: overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints: progression-free survival, ORR, clinical benefit rate, duration of response, safety/tolerability, health related QOL (NFBlSI-18; FACIT-Fatigue; EQ-5D-5L). Statistical plan: Trial is designed to demonstrate 42.5% improvement in median OS [platinum-ineligible cohort: median OS increase from 9 to 12.8 months; platinum-eligible cohort: median OS increase from 10.3 to 14.7 months]; 80% power with 1-sided 0.025 type I error rate; HR (pembro+SG/SOC) 0.70, N=320. Trial Status: Activation date: 10/23/2025 (1 patient accrued as of Jan 6, 2026; 28 approved sites, additional sites pending). Clinical trial information: NCT06524544 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US), University of Washington (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Yale University (US), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), University of Kansas Medical Center (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.