Remote, scalable weight-loss interventions after early-stage breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

e12748 Background: Obesity is associated with worse breast cancer outcomes, but whether intentional weight loss improves recurrence or survival remains uncertain. Remote, scalable lifestyle interventions may broaden access to weight management after early-stage breast cancer. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials evaluating remote weight-loss interventions and their effects on weight and breast cancer outcomes. Methods: We searched PubMed and ScienceDirect for randomized controlled trials published through January 2026 evaluating telehealth/remote weight-loss interventions in patients with breast cancer and reporting weight-related outcomes and/or breast cancer endpoints. We followed PRISMA guidance and pooled outcomes using random-effects models in RevMan 5.4.1. Results: Of 638 records identified, 6 randomized controlled trials (n = 1,594) met inclusion criteria. Participants received weight-control interventions delivered via telehealth (48.9%), usual care (48.9%), or in-person programs (2.2%). In pooled analysis, telehealth interventions resulted in significantly greater weight reduction than usual care at 6 months (MD −3.17 kg; 95% CI −4.12 to −2.22; p < 0.0001; I² = 57%), 12 months (MD −3.94 kg; 95% CI −4.80 to −3.09; p < 0.00001; I² = 0%), and 18 months (MD −3.51 kg; 95% CI −4.50 to −2.53; p < 0.0001; I² = 0%). Waist circumference reduction was also significantly greater with telehealth at 6 months (MD −4.36 cm; 95% CI −7.09 to −1.63; p = 0.002; I² = 0%). Only one of the included trials had a follow-up period long enough to assess the impact of weight loss on survival outcomes and to evaluate oncologic outcomes; disease-free survival was not significantly different (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.41–1.24; p = 0.23). A 5% weight reduction was associated with a non-significant improvement in overall survival (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.47–1.12; p = 0.15). Conclusions: Remote/telehealth interventions produce clinically meaningful weight loss and reductions in waist circumference after early-stage breast cancer, underscoring their potential in patient management. Findings from the initial RCT to determine the impact of this weight loss on breast cancer survival suggest a possible benefit, though evidence remains limited. Larger RCTs with adequate follow-up are essential to confirm whether these interventions can improve breast cancer outcomes and inform clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.e12748
Primary Topic
Cancer Risks and Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Remote, scalable weight-loss interventions after early-stage breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Navkirat Kahlon, Asim Haider, Jude O. Ossai, Zaheer Qureshi et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Cancer Risks and Factors
article

Remote, scalable weight-loss interventions after early-stage breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Navkirat Kahlon, Asim Haider, Jude O. Ossai, Zaheer Qureshi, Abdur Jamil, Rimsha Siddique
article en

Abstract

e12748 Background: Obesity is associated with worse breast cancer outcomes, but whether intentional weight loss improves recurrence or survival remains uncertain. Remote, scalable lifestyle interventions may broaden access to weight management after early-stage breast cancer. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials evaluating remote weight-loss interventions and their effects on weight and breast cancer outcomes. Methods: We searched PubMed and ScienceDirect for randomized controlled trials published through January 2026 evaluating telehealth/remote weight-loss interventions in patients with breast cancer and reporting weight-related outcomes and/or breast cancer endpoints. We followed PRISMA guidance and pooled outcomes using random-effects models in RevMan 5.4.1. Results: Of 638 records identified, 6 randomized controlled trials (n = 1,594) met inclusion criteria. Participants received weight-control interventions delivered via telehealth (48.9%), usual care (48.9%), or in-person programs (2.2%). In pooled analysis, telehealth interventions resulted in significantly greater weight reduction than usual care at 6 months (MD −3.17 kg; 95% CI −4.12 to −2.22; p < 0.0001; I² = 57%), 12 months (MD −3.94 kg; 95% CI −4.80 to −3.09; p < 0.00001; I² = 0%), and 18 months (MD −3.51 kg; 95% CI −4.50 to −2.53; p < 0.0001; I² = 0%). Waist circumference reduction was also significantly greater with telehealth at 6 months (MD −4.36 cm; 95% CI −7.09 to −1.63; p = 0.002; I² = 0%). Only one of the included trials had a follow-up period long enough to assess the impact of weight loss on survival outcomes and to evaluate oncologic outcomes; disease-free survival was not significantly different (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.41–1.24; p = 0.23). A 5% weight reduction was associated with a non-significant improvement in overall survival (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.47–1.12; p = 0.15). Conclusions: Remote/telehealth interventions produce clinically meaningful weight loss and reductions in waist circumference after early-stage breast cancer, underscoring their potential in patient management. Findings from the initial RCT to determine the impact of this weight loss on breast cancer survival suggest a possible benefit, though evidence remains limited. Larger RCTs with adequate follow-up are essential to confirm whether these interventions can improve breast cancer outcomes and inform clinical practice.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
University of Toledo Medical Center (US), Newark Beth Israel Medical Center (US), Hartford Hospital (US), Good Samaritan Medical Center (US), Rowan University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cancer Risks and Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.