Development and Validation of Linear Regression Models to Predict Plasma-Free Perampanel Concentrations Using Routine Clinical Data

Background: Therapeutic drug monitoring of perampanel, a highly protein-bound antiseizure medication, is typically based on total plasma concentration (Cpt); however, free drug concentrations are more directly associated with pharmacological effects. Measurement of free perampanel concentration (Cpf) is analytically complex and not routinely feasible in clinical practice. This study aimed to develop a practical approach for estimating Cpf using routinely available clinical data. Methods: In this single-center, prospective, observational study, clinically stable adults receiving perampanel for ≥5 days were enrolled, including ambulatory outpatients (n = 17) and hospitalized patients. Cpf and Cpt were quantified using a validated liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method, with Cpf being measured after ultrafiltration. Clinical parameters and genetic data were evaluated as potential predictors. Two linear regression models were developed using training cohort data (n = 40): model 1 incorporated Cpt as the primary predictor, whereas model 2 used the daily perampanel dose. Internal validation was performed using the validation cohort (n = 20). The association between Cpf and central nervous system adverse events was also assessed. Results: Model 1 included serum creatinine levels and treatment duration, and it demonstrated strong performance (adjusted R 2 = 0.808). Model 2 incorporated interleukin-6 and showed moderate performance (adjusted R 2 = 0.662). Both models demonstrated good internal validity, and the predicted Cpf correlated with the observed values in the validation cohort. Cpf tended to be higher in patients with central nervous system adverse events ( P = 0.195). Conclusions: Two linear regression models were developed to estimate unbound perampanel concentration (Cpf) using routine clinical data. These models may facilitate the therapeutic drug monitoring of perampanel when experimentally determined unbound perampanel concentrations are unavailable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/ftd.0000000000001479
Primary Topic
Epilepsy research and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Validation of Linear Regression Models to Predict Plasma-Free Perampanel Concentrations Using Routine Clinical Data

Shinichiro Koizumi, Yasuaki Mino, Kazuhiko Kurozumi, Takafumi Naito et al.
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
Epilepsy research and treatment
article

Development and Validation of Linear Regression Models to Predict Plasma-Free Perampanel Concentrations Using Routine Clinical Data

Shinichiro Koizumi, Yasuaki Mino, Kazuhiko Kurozumi, Takafumi Naito, Toshiaki Suzuki, Tatsuya Yagi, Junichi Kawakami, Rena Yamaguchi, Koji Suzuki
article en

Abstract

Background: Therapeutic drug monitoring of perampanel, a highly protein-bound antiseizure medication, is typically based on total plasma concentration (Cpt); however, free drug concentrations are more directly associated with pharmacological effects. Measurement of free perampanel concentration (Cpf) is analytically complex and not routinely feasible in clinical practice. This study aimed to develop a practical approach for estimating Cpf using routinely available clinical data. Methods: In this single-center, prospective, observational study, clinically stable adults receiving perampanel for ≥5 days were enrolled, including ambulatory outpatients (n = 17) and hospitalized patients. Cpf and Cpt were quantified using a validated liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method, with Cpf being measured after ultrafiltration. Clinical parameters and genetic data were evaluated as potential predictors. Two linear regression models were developed using training cohort data (n = 40): model 1 incorporated Cpt as the primary predictor, whereas model 2 used the daily perampanel dose. Internal validation was performed using the validation cohort (n = 20). The association between Cpf and central nervous system adverse events was also assessed. Results: Model 1 included serum creatinine levels and treatment duration, and it demonstrated strong performance (adjusted R 2 = 0.808). Model 2 incorporated interleukin-6 and showed moderate performance (adjusted R 2 = 0.662). Both models demonstrated good internal validity, and the predicted Cpf correlated with the observed values in the validation cohort. Cpf tended to be higher in patients with central nervous system adverse events ( P = 0.195). Conclusions: Two linear regression models were developed to estimate unbound perampanel concentration (Cpf) using routine clinical data. These models may facilitate the therapeutic drug monitoring of perampanel when experimentally determined unbound perampanel concentrations are unavailable.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
Hamamatsu University School of Medicine (JP), Shinshu University Hospital (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Epilepsy research and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.