Reducing avoidable observation stays in cancer patients requiring procedural interventions through standardized ED pathways.

e23289 Background: Patients with cancer frequently present to the emergency department (ED) with symptomatic malignant pleural effusions, malignant ascites, or complications related to indwelling devices such as gastrostomy or nephrostomy tubes. These conditions often require procedures that are not routinely performed outside of regular working hours, resulting in potentially avoidable overnight hospital observation stays. The purpose of this Quality Improvement (QI) project was to reduce unnecessary observation admissions for such patients. Our specific aim was to achieve a 10% reduction in ED-to-observation unit admissions for patients awaiting these procedures. Methods: Through interdisciplinary collaboration, existing workflows for arranging procedures for ED patients were reviewed and standardized clinical pathways were developed. These pathways enabled eligible patients to be discharged from the ED with arrangements for completion of selected procedures within 48 hours. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined to ensure appropriate patient selection, and safety measures were incorporated through structured notification and follow-up processes. A retrospective chart review was conducted for eligible encounters before and after pathway implementation, applying consistent inclusion and exclusion criteria across both periods. Included cases were independently reviewed by two reviewers to determine whether patients could have been safely discharged if outpatient procedures had been arranged within 48 hours. Discrepancies were resolved by a third independent reviewer. Results: A total of 332 encounters were included. In the baseline period (n = 268), 76 encounters (29.7%) were deemed appropriate for discharge rather than observation. In the intervention period (n = 61), 15 encounters (34.8%) were judged to have involved avoidable observation stays. Among all encounters considered safe for discharge, a significantly higher proportion of patients were discharged during the intervention period. The mean time from discharge to procedure completion did not differ significantly between periods. Conclusions: Interdisciplinary collaboration enabled the development and implementation of feasible and effective clinical pathways that reduced avoidable observation stays. In addition to alleviating ED and hospital crowding, these workflows may confer financial, physical, and psychological benefits to patients. This model may be adaptable to other procedures and care pathways to further optimize resource utilization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.e23289
Primary Topic
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reducing avoidable observation stays in cancer patients requiring procedural interventions through standardized ED pathways.

Maria Susan Gaeta, John Stroh, Danna Michelle Markides, Zeyad Metwalli et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
article

Reducing avoidable observation stays in cancer patients requiring procedural interventions through standardized ED pathways.

Maria Susan Gaeta, John Stroh, Danna Michelle Markides, Zeyad Metwalli, Deric Antony Balan, Wei Lin Tallie Chua, Joanne Dalusung, Smitha P. Raphel, Justyn S. Samways, Maria Christina M. Soliman
article en

Abstract

e23289 Background: Patients with cancer frequently present to the emergency department (ED) with symptomatic malignant pleural effusions, malignant ascites, or complications related to indwelling devices such as gastrostomy or nephrostomy tubes. These conditions often require procedures that are not routinely performed outside of regular working hours, resulting in potentially avoidable overnight hospital observation stays. The purpose of this Quality Improvement (QI) project was to reduce unnecessary observation admissions for such patients. Our specific aim was to achieve a 10% reduction in ED-to-observation unit admissions for patients awaiting these procedures. Methods: Through interdisciplinary collaboration, existing workflows for arranging procedures for ED patients were reviewed and standardized clinical pathways were developed. These pathways enabled eligible patients to be discharged from the ED with arrangements for completion of selected procedures within 48 hours. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined to ensure appropriate patient selection, and safety measures were incorporated through structured notification and follow-up processes. A retrospective chart review was conducted for eligible encounters before and after pathway implementation, applying consistent inclusion and exclusion criteria across both periods. Included cases were independently reviewed by two reviewers to determine whether patients could have been safely discharged if outpatient procedures had been arranged within 48 hours. Discrepancies were resolved by a third independent reviewer. Results: A total of 332 encounters were included. In the baseline period (n = 268), 76 encounters (29.7%) were deemed appropriate for discharge rather than observation. In the intervention period (n = 61), 15 encounters (34.8%) were judged to have involved avoidable observation stays. Among all encounters considered safe for discharge, a significantly higher proportion of patients were discharged during the intervention period. The mean time from discharge to procedure completion did not differ significantly between periods. Conclusions: Interdisciplinary collaboration enabled the development and implementation of feasible and effective clinical pathways that reduced avoidable observation stays. In addition to alleviating ED and hospital crowding, these workflows may confer financial, physical, and psychological benefits to patients. This model may be adaptable to other procedures and care pathways to further optimize resource utilization.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.