MVA-BN monkeypox vaccine safety in a clinical trial in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

Abstract The MVA-BN vaccine is considered safe and effective and has been widely deployed to prevent monkeypox. However, safety and tolerability data from endemic areas are limited. We performed a single-arm clinical trial of the safety of the MVA-BN vaccine among adults in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05734508; Registered 21 February 2023). Participants were personnel working on a monkeypox therapeutics trial (PALM-007) conducted in a high-risk, endemic setting for monkeypox. Participants received two doses of vaccine 28 days apart and were actively followed up to 28 days after each dose to assess the safety profile of MVA-BN. From March 2023 to June 2024, 500 participants were enrolled and received their first vaccine dose; 494 (99%) received the second dose and associated follow-up. There were no adverse events (AEs) of grade 3 or higher observed during the study. 175 participants (35%) reported at least one vaccination site AE, the most common of which was mild or moderate vaccination site pain (120/500 first dose recipients (24%); 48/494 second dose recipients (10%)). There was one recorded case of breakthrough monkeypox occurring approximately 3 months after the second dose. This observational study provides further evidence that the MVA-BN monkeypox vaccine is generally safe and well-tolerated. As previously reported, the most common AEs were mild or moderate injection site reactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Vaccines
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-026-01490-0
Primary Topic
Poxvirus research and outbreaks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MVA-BN monkeypox vaccine safety in a clinical trial in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

Jean-Luc Biampata, Emily Yox, Aline B. Engo, Laurens Liesenborghs et al.
npj Vaccines
Poxvirus research and outbreaks
article

MVA-BN monkeypox vaccine safety in a clinical trial in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

Jean-Luc Biampata, Emily Yox, Aline B. Engo, Laurens Liesenborghs, Percy Velela, Michael Kombozi Basika, Lori E. Dodd, Susan Vogel, Tarcisse Kapene Kilara, Gail Potter, Emmanuella Muhima, Placide Mbala, Gaston Tona, Jean-Jaques Muyembe, Laetitia Itunime, Olivier Tshiani Mbaya, H. Clifford Lane, Nsengi Ntamabyaliro, Mariano Lusakibanza, Tyler Bonnett, Veronique Nussenblatt
article en

Abstract

Abstract The MVA-BN vaccine is considered safe and effective and has been widely deployed to prevent monkeypox. However, safety and tolerability data from endemic areas are limited. We performed a single-arm clinical trial of the safety of the MVA-BN vaccine among adults in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05734508; Registered 21 February 2023). Participants were personnel working on a monkeypox therapeutics trial (PALM-007) conducted in a high-risk, endemic setting for monkeypox. Participants received two doses of vaccine 28 days apart and were actively followed up to 28 days after each dose to assess the safety profile of MVA-BN. From March 2023 to June 2024, 500 participants were enrolled and received their first vaccine dose; 494 (99%) received the second dose and associated follow-up. There were no adverse events (AEs) of grade 3 or higher observed during the study. 175 participants (35%) reported at least one vaccination site AE, the most common of which was mild or moderate vaccination site pain (120/500 first dose recipients (24%); 48/494 second dose recipients (10%)). There was one recorded case of breakthrough monkeypox occurring approximately 3 months after the second dose. This observational study provides further evidence that the MVA-BN monkeypox vaccine is generally safe and well-tolerated. As previously reported, the most common AEs were mild or moderate injection site reactions.

npj Vaccines
National Institutes of Health (US), University of Kinshasa (CD), Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (US), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (US), National Institute of Biomedical Research (CD), Instituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde (BE)
National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Poxvirus research and outbreaks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.