Safety and efficacy of daraxonrasib monotherapy as later-line (3L+) treatment for patients (pts) with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

e15104 Background: Later-line (3L+) treatment for PDAC remains a high unmet need, with historically poor outcomes with chemotherapy (ORR, 3%-6%; mPFS, 2 mo; mOS, 5 mo). Oncogenic RAS mutations occur in > 90% of pts with mPDAC. Daraxonrasib is a potent, oral, RAS(ON) multi-selective, tri-complex inhibitor that targets active GTP-bound RAS, including variants with mutations at codons G12, G13, and Q61, as well as wild-type RAS. Previously reported phase 1/2 data for daraxonrasib (NCT05379985) demonstrated manageable safety and encouraging efficacy in previously treated RAS mutant PDAC (2L+). We now present safety and efficacy outcomes from this study in pts with RAS mutations treated in the 3L+ setting. Methods: Pts with 3L+ RAS-mutant PDAC received daraxonrasib 300 mg QD. The primary objective was safety and tolerability; the secondary objective was efficacy. Results: As of Dec 1, 2025, 46 pts received daraxonrasib 300 mg; median follow-up was 22.6 months (range, 15.1-27.8). The majority of pts enrolled had ECOG PS of 1 (63%); the median number of prior systemic therapies in the metastatic setting was 2 (range, 2-5). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurring in ≥15% of all pts were rash (87%), diarrhea (50%), stomatitis/mucositis (48%), nausea (41%), vomiting (35%), dry skin (22%), paronychia (22%), and fatigue (15%); the most common (≥5%) grade ≥3 TRAEs were rash (9%), stomatitis/mucositis (7%), and anemia (7%). Grade 4 platelet count decrease and lymphocyte count decrease were reported in 1 pt each. No grade 5 TRAEs occurred. No pts discontinued treatment due to TRAEs. The mean relative dose intensity was 88%. Efficacy outcomes of daraxonrasib are shown in the table. Conclusions: Daraxonrasib 300 mg QD in 3L+ PDAC demonstrated a manageable safety profile consistent with earlier-line experience. A majority of pts achieved disease control supported by encouraging survival. Clinical trial information: NCT05379985 . Efficacy measures in 3L+ a PDAC All RAS mutant (n=46) ORR (95% CI), % b 20 (9-34) Disease control rate (95% CI), % c 85 (71-94) PFS d , median (95% CI), mo d 4.3 (4.0-7.8) OS d , median (95% CI), mo d 9.0 (6.4-11.1) a Defined as treatment in pts who had received ≥2 prior lines of therapy in the metastatic setting, including pts who had received prior therapy in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting whose disease had progressed within 6 mo. b Includes confirmed complete response (CR) and partial response (PR). c Includes confirmed CR, confirmed PR, and stable disease. d Estimate based on Kaplan-Meier method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.e15104
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety and efficacy of daraxonrasib monotherapy as later-line (3L+) treatment for patients (pts) with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

Rashmi Vora, Aparna Hegde, David Sommerhalder, Salman Rafi Punekar et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Safety and efficacy of daraxonrasib monotherapy as later-line (3L+) treatment for patients (pts) with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

Rashmi Vora, Aparna Hegde, David Sommerhalder, Salman Rafi Punekar, A Spira, B A Mannion, J. Randolph Hecht, Yidan Xu, Meredith Pelster, Zhaohui Arter, Benjamin Herzberg, David S. Hong, Brian M. Wolpin, Jenny Yuan, Wungki Park, Ignacio Garrido-Laguna
article en

Abstract

e15104 Background: Later-line (3L+) treatment for PDAC remains a high unmet need, with historically poor outcomes with chemotherapy (ORR, 3%-6%; mPFS, 2 mo; mOS, 5 mo). Oncogenic RAS mutations occur in > 90% of pts with mPDAC. Daraxonrasib is a potent, oral, RAS(ON) multi-selective, tri-complex inhibitor that targets active GTP-bound RAS, including variants with mutations at codons G12, G13, and Q61, as well as wild-type RAS. Previously reported phase 1/2 data for daraxonrasib (NCT05379985) demonstrated manageable safety and encouraging efficacy in previously treated RAS mutant PDAC (2L+). We now present safety and efficacy outcomes from this study in pts with RAS mutations treated in the 3L+ setting. Methods: Pts with 3L+ RAS-mutant PDAC received daraxonrasib 300 mg QD. The primary objective was safety and tolerability; the secondary objective was efficacy. Results: As of Dec 1, 2025, 46 pts received daraxonrasib 300 mg; median follow-up was 22.6 months (range, 15.1-27.8). The majority of pts enrolled had ECOG PS of 1 (63%); the median number of prior systemic therapies in the metastatic setting was 2 (range, 2-5). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurring in ≥15% of all pts were rash (87%), diarrhea (50%), stomatitis/mucositis (48%), nausea (41%), vomiting (35%), dry skin (22%), paronychia (22%), and fatigue (15%); the most common (≥5%) grade ≥3 TRAEs were rash (9%), stomatitis/mucositis (7%), and anemia (7%). Grade 4 platelet count decrease and lymphocyte count decrease were reported in 1 pt each. No grade 5 TRAEs occurred. No pts discontinued treatment due to TRAEs. The mean relative dose intensity was 88%. Efficacy outcomes of daraxonrasib are shown in the table. Conclusions: Daraxonrasib 300 mg QD in 3L+ PDAC demonstrated a manageable safety profile consistent with earlier-line experience. A majority of pts achieved disease control supported by encouraging survival. Clinical trial information: NCT05379985 . Efficacy measures in 3L+ a PDAC All RAS mutant (n=46) ORR (95% CI), % b 20 (9-34) Disease control rate (95% CI), % c 85 (71-94) PFS d , median (95% CI), mo d 4.3 (4.0-7.8) OS d , median (95% CI), mo d 9.0 (6.4-11.1) a Defined as treatment in pts who had received ≥2 prior lines of therapy in the metastatic setting, including pts who had received prior therapy in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting whose disease had progressed within 6 mo. b Includes confirmed complete response (CR) and partial response (PR). c Includes confirmed CR, confirmed PR, and stable disease. d Estimate based on Kaplan-Meier method.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of California, Irvine (US), Cornell University (US), University of Utah (US), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), Texas Oncology (US), Huntsman Cancer Institute (US), Health Net (US), NYU Langone Health (US), Revolution Medicines (United States) (US), Sarah Cannon (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Virginia Cancer Specialists (US), Christ Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.