Neighborhood social vulnerability and chemotherapy response in breast cancer patients.

e23083 Background: Sociodemographic disparities are a well-known influence on oncologic outcomes, however their relationship to treatment response remains incompletely characterized. Evaluating neighborhood-level social vulnerability as it relates to standard cytotoxic chemotherapy response offers an opportunity to better understand and address disparities in cancer care. We sought to assess the impact of Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) on response to standard of care cytotoxic chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 180 breast cancer patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy at a safety-net academic center. Patients with stage I–IV disease who received chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting with curative intent were included. Neighborhood-level social vulnerability was assigned using the Center for Disease Control SVI, based on zip code of residence at diagnosis. Outcomes were analyzed within 5 years of diagnosis and categorized as alive without documented disease progression, disease progression or recurrence on surveillance imaging, or death. Ordinal logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between SVI and chemotherapy response, adjusting for clinical stage and age at diagnosis. Results: Among the 180 patients, 25% resided in low-SVI zip codes, 28% in low-medium, 31% in medium-high, and 17% in high-SVI zip codes. At 5 years, 61% of patients were alive without documented progression, 22% experienced disease progression, and 17% died. Increasing SVI was directionally associated with worse 5-year outcomes, with higher odds of progression or death per one-category increase in SVI (OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.45–4.08; p = 0.589), consistent with higher observed rates of progression or death in higher SVI categories. The direction of association was consistent across alternative SVI categorizations. Conclusions: In our cohort, higher neighborhood-level social vulnerability trended toward worse 5-year outcomes following cytotoxic chemotherapy among breast cancer patients. Findings were limited by sample size and were not statistically significant, but the consistent directional association supports further study. These results suggest that social vulnerability may meaningfully influence long-term chemotherapy response, highlighting the need for larger studies to inform targeted interventions aimed at mitigating disparities in cancer care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.e23083
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neighborhood social vulnerability and chemotherapy response in breast cancer patients.

Sujata Ojha, William Sessions, Ala'a Eddin Tayyem, Taylor Landry
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Neighborhood social vulnerability and chemotherapy response in breast cancer patients.

Sujata Ojha, William Sessions, Ala'a Eddin Tayyem, Taylor Landry
article en

Abstract

e23083 Background: Sociodemographic disparities are a well-known influence on oncologic outcomes, however their relationship to treatment response remains incompletely characterized. Evaluating neighborhood-level social vulnerability as it relates to standard cytotoxic chemotherapy response offers an opportunity to better understand and address disparities in cancer care. We sought to assess the impact of Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) on response to standard of care cytotoxic chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 180 breast cancer patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy at a safety-net academic center. Patients with stage I–IV disease who received chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting with curative intent were included. Neighborhood-level social vulnerability was assigned using the Center for Disease Control SVI, based on zip code of residence at diagnosis. Outcomes were analyzed within 5 years of diagnosis and categorized as alive without documented disease progression, disease progression or recurrence on surveillance imaging, or death. Ordinal logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between SVI and chemotherapy response, adjusting for clinical stage and age at diagnosis. Results: Among the 180 patients, 25% resided in low-SVI zip codes, 28% in low-medium, 31% in medium-high, and 17% in high-SVI zip codes. At 5 years, 61% of patients were alive without documented progression, 22% experienced disease progression, and 17% died. Increasing SVI was directionally associated with worse 5-year outcomes, with higher odds of progression or death per one-category increase in SVI (OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.45–4.08; p = 0.589), consistent with higher observed rates of progression or death in higher SVI categories. The direction of association was consistent across alternative SVI categorizations. Conclusions: In our cohort, higher neighborhood-level social vulnerability trended toward worse 5-year outcomes following cytotoxic chemotherapy among breast cancer patients. Findings were limited by sample size and were not statistically significant, but the consistent directional association supports further study. These results suggest that social vulnerability may meaningfully influence long-term chemotherapy response, highlighting the need for larger studies to inform targeted interventions aimed at mitigating disparities in cancer care.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.