Robotic versus laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: comparable oncologic outcomes with reduced intravesical recurrence in pathological T3 disease

Minimally invasive radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) has been increasingly adopted for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC); however, direct comparisons between laparoscopic and robot-assisted approaches remain limited. We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients treated with minimally invasive RNU with bladder cuff excision between August 2014 and July 2025. Patients were stratified into laparoscopic (LNU) and robot-assisted (RANU) groups. Perioperative outcomes and oncologic endpoints, including intravesical recurrence (IVR), disease-free survival (DFS) as well as overall survival (OS), were evaluated. Fine-Gray competing risk regression was applied to assess cancer-specific mortality and IVR. A total of 287 patients were enrolled, comprising 152 in the LNU group and 135 in the RANU group. Perioperative outcomes were comparable between groups, with no significant differences in estimated blood loss, theater time, or major complication rates. During follow-up, no remarkable differences were identified in DFS or OS. Competing risk analysis demonstrated that surgical platform was not significantly correlated with cancer-specific mortality or IVR in the overall cohort. In the subgroup of patients with pathological T3 disease, IVR occurred less frequently in the robotic group compared with the laparoscopic group (7.3% vs. 27.3%, p = 0.016). In exploratory multivariable analysis, robot-assisted surgery was associated with a decreased likelihood of IVR (sHR 0.275, p = 0.041). This finding should be interpreted cautiously in light of the limited sample size and the post-hoc nature of the analysis. Overall, robot-assisted RNU demonstrated perioperative and oncologic outcomes comparable to laparoscopic surgery. The observed difference in IVR in patients with locally advanced disease is hypothesis-generating and warrants further validation in prospective studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Robotic Surgery
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-026-03455-w
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robotic versus laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: comparable oncologic outcomes with reduced intravesical recurrence in pathological T3 disease

Chih‐Yu Yang, Chi‐Hsiang Chu, Hao-Lun Luo, Tzu-Ping Lin et al.
Journal of Robotic Surgery
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
article

Robotic versus laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: comparable oncologic outcomes with reduced intravesical recurrence in pathological T3 disease

Chih‐Yu Yang, Chi‐Hsiang Chu, Hao-Lun Luo, Tzu-Ping Lin, Chia-Cheng Yu, I-Hsuan Alan Chen
article en

Abstract

Minimally invasive radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) has been increasingly adopted for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC); however, direct comparisons between laparoscopic and robot-assisted approaches remain limited. We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients treated with minimally invasive RNU with bladder cuff excision between August 2014 and July 2025. Patients were stratified into laparoscopic (LNU) and robot-assisted (RANU) groups. Perioperative outcomes and oncologic endpoints, including intravesical recurrence (IVR), disease-free survival (DFS) as well as overall survival (OS), were evaluated. Fine-Gray competing risk regression was applied to assess cancer-specific mortality and IVR. A total of 287 patients were enrolled, comprising 152 in the LNU group and 135 in the RANU group. Perioperative outcomes were comparable between groups, with no significant differences in estimated blood loss, theater time, or major complication rates. During follow-up, no remarkable differences were identified in DFS or OS. Competing risk analysis demonstrated that surgical platform was not significantly correlated with cancer-specific mortality or IVR in the overall cohort. In the subgroup of patients with pathological T3 disease, IVR occurred less frequently in the robotic group compared with the laparoscopic group (7.3% vs. 27.3%, p = 0.016). In exploratory multivariable analysis, robot-assisted surgery was associated with a decreased likelihood of IVR (sHR 0.275, p = 0.041). This finding should be interpreted cautiously in light of the limited sample size and the post-hoc nature of the analysis. Overall, robot-assisted RNU demonstrated perioperative and oncologic outcomes comparable to laparoscopic surgery. The observed difference in IVR in patients with locally advanced disease is hypothesis-generating and warrants further validation in prospective studies.

Journal of Robotic SurgeryVol. 20(1)
National Sun Yat-sen University (TW), National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW), Chang Gung University (TW), National University of Kaohsiung (TW), Taipei Veterans General Hospital (TW), Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW), Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital (TW)
Shanghai Educational Development Foundation, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.