Blood Flow Restriction Does Not Impair Single, All‐Out Sprint Cycling Performance

This study examined the effects of sprint duration and blood flow restriction due to cuff pressure applied only during exercise on sprint cycling performance and psychophysiological responses. On separate days, 12 physically active young adults (9 men and 3 women) performed six 'all-out' cycling sprints (5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 s) in a randomised order under three cuff pressure conditions (0%, 40% and 60% of arterial occlusion pressure [AOP]). BFR was applied exclusively during exercise bouts, with passive rest periods of 5-15 min between sprints depending on sprint duration. Power output, peripheral oxygen saturation, vastus lateralis muscle oxygenation, heart rate and ratings of perceived exertion were measured. Mean and peak power output and total work done decreased with longer sprints (i.e., 20-30 s) than shorter efforts (i.e., 5-15 s), with no differences observed between cuff pressure conditions. Ventilatory responses, heart rate and muscle oxygenation variables increased with longer sprints. Peripheral oxygen saturation remained unaffected. BFR at 40% and 60% AOP increased limb discomfort for 15-, 25- and 30-s sprints compared to 0% AOP. In conclusion, increasing the sprint duration decreased mechanical output (external load) and increased physiological strain (internal load), with these effects largely unaffected by moderate-to-high (40%-60% AOP) external limb compression.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Sport Science
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsc.70200
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blood Flow Restriction Does Not Impair Single, All‐Out Sprint Cycling Performance

Marcelo Papoti, Siu Nam Li, Brendan R. Scott, Carlos Dellavechia de Carvalho et al.
European Journal of Sport Science
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
article

Blood Flow Restriction Does Not Impair Single, All‐Out Sprint Cycling Performance

Marcelo Papoti, Siu Nam Li, Brendan R. Scott, Carlos Dellavechia de Carvalho, Mohammed Ihsan, Michelle Stein, Peter Peeling, Olivier Girard
article en

Abstract

This study examined the effects of sprint duration and blood flow restriction due to cuff pressure applied only during exercise on sprint cycling performance and psychophysiological responses. On separate days, 12 physically active young adults (9 men and 3 women) performed six 'all-out' cycling sprints (5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 s) in a randomised order under three cuff pressure conditions (0%, 40% and 60% of arterial occlusion pressure [AOP]). BFR was applied exclusively during exercise bouts, with passive rest periods of 5-15 min between sprints depending on sprint duration. Power output, peripheral oxygen saturation, vastus lateralis muscle oxygenation, heart rate and ratings of perceived exertion were measured. Mean and peak power output and total work done decreased with longer sprints (i.e., 20-30 s) than shorter efforts (i.e., 5-15 s), with no differences observed between cuff pressure conditions. Ventilatory responses, heart rate and muscle oxygenation variables increased with longer sprints. Peripheral oxygen saturation remained unaffected. BFR at 40% and 60% AOP increased limb discomfort for 15-, 25- and 30-s sprints compared to 0% AOP. In conclusion, increasing the sprint duration decreased mechanical output (external load) and increased physiological strain (internal load), with these effects largely unaffected by moderate-to-high (40%-60% AOP) external limb compression.

European Journal of Sport ScienceVol. 26(6)
Oklahoma State Department of Health (US), Universidade de Ribeirão Preto (BR), Murdoch University (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR), United Arab Emirates University (AE), Clinics Hospital of Ribeirão Preto (BR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.