Safety and objective response of KRAS G12C inhibitors versus docetaxel in previously treated advanced NSCLC: Meta-analysis of randomized trials.

e20747 Background: Patients with previously treated KRAS G12C–mutated advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have limited standard options, with docetaxel remaining a commonly used therapy after progression on platinum-based chemotherapy and immunotherapy. KRAS G12C inhibitors have demonstrated antitumor activity in this setting, but their comparative efficacy and treatment tolerability versus docetaxel across randomized trials remain clinically relevant. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare objective response rate (ORR) and treatment discontinuation due to treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) between KRAS G12C inhibitors anddocetaxel. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to September 2025 to identify randomized controlled trials comparing KRAS G12C inhibitors versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated advanced or metastatic KRAS G12C–mutated non–small cell lung cancer. Three study reports/datasets were included, comprising a total of 912 patients. Eligible studies reported objective response rate (ORR) and/or treatment discontinuation due to treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Pooled analyses were performed using random-effects models, and results were expressed as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Three study reports/datasets were included. For objective response rate (ORR), KRAS G12C inhibitors were associated with significantly higher tumor response compared with docetaxel (RR 2.90; 95% CI 1.72–4.89; P < 0.0001; I² = 44%), with a total of 165 responses among 550 patients in the KRAS G12C inhibitor group versus 38 responses among 362 patients receiving docetaxel. Regarding treatment tolerability, discontinuation due to treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was significantly more frequent with KRAS G12C inhibitors compared with docetaxel (RR 1.78; 95% CI 1.02–3.13; P = 0.04; I² = 0%), corresponding to 45 discontinuations among 545 patients in the KRAS G12C inhibitor group versus 15 discontinuations among 327 patients in the docetaxel group. Conclusions: KRAS G12C inhibitors demonstrate significantly higher objective response rates compared with docetaxel in previously treated KRAS G12C–mutated advanced NSCLC, supporting superior antitumor activity in this setting. However, treatment discontinuation due to TRAEs was also significantly more frequent with KRAS G12C inhibitors, highlighting an important tolerability trade-off that may impact treatment delivery in clinical practice. These findings emphasize the need to balance response benefit with toxicity-related interruption, and underscore the importance of time-to-event outcomes and patient-centered endpoints to guide optimal sequencing strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.e20747
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety and objective response of KRAS G12C inhibitors versus docetaxel in previously treated advanced NSCLC: Meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Sergio Morales Acosta, Victor Andres Castillo, Jose Montejano, Lluvia Murillo et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
article

Safety and objective response of KRAS G12C inhibitors versus docetaxel in previously treated advanced NSCLC: Meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Sergio Morales Acosta, Victor Andres Castillo, Jose Montejano, Lluvia Murillo, Pia Valeria Frontanilla Sanchez, Jorge Sandoval
article en

Abstract

e20747 Background: Patients with previously treated KRAS G12C–mutated advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have limited standard options, with docetaxel remaining a commonly used therapy after progression on platinum-based chemotherapy and immunotherapy. KRAS G12C inhibitors have demonstrated antitumor activity in this setting, but their comparative efficacy and treatment tolerability versus docetaxel across randomized trials remain clinically relevant. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare objective response rate (ORR) and treatment discontinuation due to treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) between KRAS G12C inhibitors anddocetaxel. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to September 2025 to identify randomized controlled trials comparing KRAS G12C inhibitors versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated advanced or metastatic KRAS G12C–mutated non–small cell lung cancer. Three study reports/datasets were included, comprising a total of 912 patients. Eligible studies reported objective response rate (ORR) and/or treatment discontinuation due to treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Pooled analyses were performed using random-effects models, and results were expressed as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Three study reports/datasets were included. For objective response rate (ORR), KRAS G12C inhibitors were associated with significantly higher tumor response compared with docetaxel (RR 2.90; 95% CI 1.72–4.89; P < 0.0001; I² = 44%), with a total of 165 responses among 550 patients in the KRAS G12C inhibitor group versus 38 responses among 362 patients receiving docetaxel. Regarding treatment tolerability, discontinuation due to treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was significantly more frequent with KRAS G12C inhibitors compared with docetaxel (RR 1.78; 95% CI 1.02–3.13; P = 0.04; I² = 0%), corresponding to 45 discontinuations among 545 patients in the KRAS G12C inhibitor group versus 15 discontinuations among 327 patients in the docetaxel group. Conclusions: KRAS G12C inhibitors demonstrate significantly higher objective response rates compared with docetaxel in previously treated KRAS G12C–mutated advanced NSCLC, supporting superior antitumor activity in this setting. However, treatment discontinuation due to TRAEs was also significantly more frequent with KRAS G12C inhibitors, highlighting an important tolerability trade-off that may impact treatment delivery in clinical practice. These findings emphasize the need to balance response benefit with toxicity-related interruption, and underscore the importance of time-to-event outcomes and patient-centered endpoints to guide optimal sequencing strategies.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara (MX), Universidad Autónoma de Baja California (MX), Universidad de Guadalajara (MX), Universidad Católica Bolivia San Pablo (BO), Universidad Cristiana de Bolivia (BO), Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas "Francisco García Salinas" (MX)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.