Comparison of Imputation Methods for Activated Sludge Data: A Case Study on Imputing Missing Data

The activated sludge process is pivotal in wastewater treatment, with ongoing research into its process control methods. Modeling treatment plants aids in analyzing relationships among variables, supporting fault detection and operational decision-making. However, datasets from real-world treatment plants often contain outliers and missing values due to sensor faults, maintenance activities, and operational disruptions, making outlier handling and data imputation essential for reliable modeling. Existing studies on data imputation for activated sludge systems are often based on synthetic or short datasets, limited method comparisons, or inconsistent evaluation metrics, which reduces their applicability to full-scale operational settings. This study addresses these limitations by presenting a comprehensive, head-to-head comparison of Kohonen Self-Organising Maps (KSOM) with widely used multiple imputation and tree-based methods, namely Amelia II, MICE, missForest, and missRanger. The methods are applied to a real-world multivariate dataset comprising 19 process variables collected over 8.5 years from a full-scale activated sludge treatment plant, containing 39% overall missing data with highly uneven missingness across variables. A validation framework based on held-out observation data is used, and performance is assessed using complementary metrics, including the coefficient of determination (R2), average absolute error (AAE), relative average absolute error (RAAE), mean squared error (MSE), and root mean squared error (RMSE). Results show that KSOM consistently outperforms the competing methods across most variables and evaluation metrics. KSOM achieves near-perfect R2 values (≈1) for many process variables, with lower absolute and relative errors, even for variables with very high (>70%) and irregular missingness. These findings highlight KSOM’s robustness in capturing multivariate relationships and cluster structure in complex, operational WWTP data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Waste
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/waste4020017
Primary Topic
Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Imputation Methods for Activated Sludge Data: A Case Study on Imputing Missing Data

Rabee Rustum, Malini Deepak
Waste
Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
article

Comparison of Imputation Methods for Activated Sludge Data: A Case Study on Imputing Missing Data

Rabee Rustum, Malini Deepak
article en

Abstract

The activated sludge process is pivotal in wastewater treatment, with ongoing research into its process control methods. Modeling treatment plants aids in analyzing relationships among variables, supporting fault detection and operational decision-making. However, datasets from real-world treatment plants often contain outliers and missing values due to sensor faults, maintenance activities, and operational disruptions, making outlier handling and data imputation essential for reliable modeling. Existing studies on data imputation for activated sludge systems are often based on synthetic or short datasets, limited method comparisons, or inconsistent evaluation metrics, which reduces their applicability to full-scale operational settings. This study addresses these limitations by presenting a comprehensive, head-to-head comparison of Kohonen Self-Organising Maps (KSOM) with widely used multiple imputation and tree-based methods, namely Amelia II, MICE, missForest, and missRanger. The methods are applied to a real-world multivariate dataset comprising 19 process variables collected over 8.5 years from a full-scale activated sludge treatment plant, containing 39% overall missing data with highly uneven missingness across variables. A validation framework based on held-out observation data is used, and performance is assessed using complementary metrics, including the coefficient of determination (R2), average absolute error (AAE), relative average absolute error (RAAE), mean squared error (MSE), and root mean squared error (RMSE). Results show that KSOM consistently outperforms the competing methods across most variables and evaluation metrics. KSOM achieves near-perfect R2 values (≈1) for many process variables, with lower absolute and relative errors, even for variables with very high (>70%) and irregular missingness. These findings highlight KSOM’s robustness in capturing multivariate relationships and cluster structure in complex, operational WWTP data.

WasteVol. 4(2)
Heriot-Watt University Dubai (AE)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.