A phase 3, international, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of selective index lymph node resection versus therapeutic lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant immunotherapy for stage IIIB-D melanoma (MSLT-3/S2601/EORTC2519).

TPS9609 Background: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy (NAT) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is a standard therapy for resectable stage III melanoma, with randomized trials demonstrating superior outcomes compared to adjuvant therapy alone. The phase 2 SWOG-1801 trial showed 72% EFS at 2 yrs for NAT & 49% for adjuvant PEMBRO (P=0.004), while the phase 3 NADINA trial confirmed superiority of NAT IPI/NIVO over adjuvant NIVO (2-year RFS 83.7% vs 57.2%, HR 0.32). Pathological response, particularly major pathological response (MPR; ≤10% viable tumor), strongly correlates with improved outcomes, with the International Neoadjuvant Melanoma Consortium (INMC) pooled analysis (N=610 ICI patients) demonstrating 3-yr RFS of 93% for MPR patients (pts) vs 41% for those with no pathological response. The PRADO trial demonstrated that selective index lymph node (ILN) resection (RES) can safely de-escalate surgery in MPR pts, with only 4/60 (6.7%) MPR pts recurring after median follow-up of 28.1 months, all locoregionally. ILN RES significantly reduced surgical morbidity & improved quality of life compared to therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND). However, PRADO was a single-arm proof-of-concept study. An international survey of 117 melanoma experts showed 71% believe a phase 3 randomized controlled trial is needed to change practice. The MSLT-3 trial will definitively establish whether ILN RES is non-inferior to standard TLND for MPR pts. Methods: This phase 3, international, multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority trial will enroll approximately 1,574 pts with resectable stage IIIB-D cutaneous melanoma to identify 496 with MPR following NAT. Eligible pts must have cytologically/histologically confirmed resectable stage IIIB-D melanoma with at least one macroscopic lymph node in groin, axilla or neck basins. All pts are randomized 1:1 to ILN RES or TLND, stratified by continent/region, AJCC stage, & NAT regimen. Prior to NAT, all pts undergo radiological placement of a marker in the largest metastatic lymph node. Pts receive NAT per institutional standard of care (minimum one PD-(L)-1 checkpoint inhibitor, maximum 6 weeks duration) followed by surgery at weeks 6-9 according to randomized arm. Pathological response is assessed per INMC criteria. Pts with MPR in the ILN arm undergo surveillance only; non-MPR pts in the ILN arm proceed to TLND within 3 weeks. Primary endpoint is 2-year recurrence-free survival in MPR pts (non-inferiority margin -5%). Secondary endpoints include escalation to TLND for isolated nodal recurrence, salvage therapy rates, distant metastasis-free survival, event-free survival, overall survival, surgery-related AEs, quality of life (QLQ-C30, EQ-5D-5L, FACT-M), concordance of imaging/ctDNA with pathology & health economics. Clinical trial information: NCT07049276 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.tps9609
Primary Topic
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A phase 3, international, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of selective index lymph node resection versus therapeutic lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant immunotherapy for stage IIIB-D melanoma (MSLT-3/S2601/EORTC2519).

Kerwin F. Shannon, S LO, Sapna Pradyuman Patel, Robert V. Rawson et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
article

A phase 3, international, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of selective index lymph node resection versus therapeutic lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant immunotherapy for stage IIIB-D melanoma (MSLT-3/S2601/EORTC2519).

Kerwin F. Shannon, S LO, Sapna Pradyuman Patel, Robert V. Rawson, Andrew Barbour, Monica Osorio, Helen Rizos, Mark B. Faries, Maria Gonzalez, Julia Elizabeth Lai-Kwon, Alexander Christopher Jonathan Van Akkooi, Chi Kin Law, A Menzies, Sydney Ch'ng, Daniela Massi, Robyn P.M. Saw, Andrew J. Spillane, Georgina V. Long, Thomas E. Pennington, Mario Mandala
article en

Abstract

TPS9609 Background: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy (NAT) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is a standard therapy for resectable stage III melanoma, with randomized trials demonstrating superior outcomes compared to adjuvant therapy alone. The phase 2 SWOG-1801 trial showed 72% EFS at 2 yrs for NAT & 49% for adjuvant PEMBRO (P=0.004), while the phase 3 NADINA trial confirmed superiority of NAT IPI/NIVO over adjuvant NIVO (2-year RFS 83.7% vs 57.2%, HR 0.32). Pathological response, particularly major pathological response (MPR; ≤10% viable tumor), strongly correlates with improved outcomes, with the International Neoadjuvant Melanoma Consortium (INMC) pooled analysis (N=610 ICI patients) demonstrating 3-yr RFS of 93% for MPR patients (pts) vs 41% for those with no pathological response. The PRADO trial demonstrated that selective index lymph node (ILN) resection (RES) can safely de-escalate surgery in MPR pts, with only 4/60 (6.7%) MPR pts recurring after median follow-up of 28.1 months, all locoregionally. ILN RES significantly reduced surgical morbidity & improved quality of life compared to therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND). However, PRADO was a single-arm proof-of-concept study. An international survey of 117 melanoma experts showed 71% believe a phase 3 randomized controlled trial is needed to change practice. The MSLT-3 trial will definitively establish whether ILN RES is non-inferior to standard TLND for MPR pts. Methods: This phase 3, international, multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority trial will enroll approximately 1,574 pts with resectable stage IIIB-D cutaneous melanoma to identify 496 with MPR following NAT. Eligible pts must have cytologically/histologically confirmed resectable stage IIIB-D melanoma with at least one macroscopic lymph node in groin, axilla or neck basins. All pts are randomized 1:1 to ILN RES or TLND, stratified by continent/region, AJCC stage, & NAT regimen. Prior to NAT, all pts undergo radiological placement of a marker in the largest metastatic lymph node. Pts receive NAT per institutional standard of care (minimum one PD-(L)-1 checkpoint inhibitor, maximum 6 weeks duration) followed by surgery at weeks 6-9 according to randomized arm. Pathological response is assessed per INMC criteria. Pts with MPR in the ILN arm undergo surveillance only; non-MPR pts in the ILN arm proceed to TLND within 3 weeks. Primary endpoint is 2-year recurrence-free survival in MPR pts (non-inferiority margin -5%). Secondary endpoints include escalation to TLND for isolated nodal recurrence, salvage therapy rates, distant metastasis-free survival, event-free survival, overall survival, surgery-related AEs, quality of life (QLQ-C30, EQ-5D-5L, FACT-M), concordance of imaging/ctDNA with pathology & health economics. Clinical trial information: NCT07049276 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
The University of Sydney (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), University of Perugia (IT), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU), Mater Misericordiae Hospital (AU), Chris O’Brien Lifehouse (AU), Angeles Clinic and Research Institute (US), Melanoma Institute Australia (AU), University of Colorado Cancer Center (US), University of Florence (IT), University of Colorado Denver (US), Macquarie University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.